| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Klaus P. Schumann | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. James E. Anderholm | Member | ||
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for award of the Purple Heart (PH) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) and was wounded in action while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He claims that he was wounded in action in mid June 1968, and as result he is entitled to the PH.
3. In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), a copy of a correction to the DD Form 214
(DD Form 215), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) form appointing the VA as his representative (VA Form 21-22), a chronological record of medical care
(SF 600), one page of a health record (DA Form 2658), and a VA rating decision dated, 4 May 2001.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2002074886, on 17 September 2002.
2. As new argument, the applicant provides a copy of a medical treatment document from his record that shows that he was treated at the 7th Surgical Hospital on 17 June 1968 for a tiny fragment wound to his right humerus.
3. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the RVN from 16 June 1967 through 13 July 1968, and that during this tour he was assigned to the 214th Combat Aviation Battalion, from 16 June through 17 August 1967, the 191st Assault Helicopter Company, from 18 August through 23 October 1967, and the 135th Aviation Company, from 24 October 1967 through 11 July 1968. There is no indication that he served with an infantry unit during his tour in the RVN. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, which indicates that he was never wounded or injured in action during his tenure on active duty.
4. A review of the casualty listing for the RVN does not show the applicant as having been wounded during his tour in Vietnam. Additionally, the historical files of the 135th Aviation Company, 12th Aviation Group and the 7th Surgical Hospital, RVN were reviewed at the National Archives, College Park, Maryland. This search failed to provide any documentary evidence to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action while serving in the RVN.
5. During its original review of the case, the Board found no military records that supported the applicant’s claim that he was wounded in action or that he was ever treated for a wound or injury received as a direct result of or that was caused by enemy action. The Board also concluded that the evidence of record showed the applicant served in aviation units during his tour of duty in the RVN, and that he did not serve in a qualifying infantry unit that would entitle him to receive the CIB.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army’s awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on awarding the Purple Heart. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized to members who are wounded in action. A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained in action. The wound for which a PH is being awarded must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the records of medical treatment for the wound or injury for which the PH is being awarded must have been made a matter of official record.
7. Chapter 8 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding Badges and Tabs. Paragraph 8-6 contains the criteria for awarding the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such ground combat.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he is entitled to the PH. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. By regulation, in order to award the PH it is necessary to establish that a soldier was wounded in action, that the wound required treatment by a medical officer, and that the record of medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
2. The evidence of record provides no confirmation that the applicant was ever wounded in action. Although the medical treatment record now provided by the applicant shows that he received treatment for a tiny fragment wound to his right humerus on 17 June 1968, it gives no indication that this injury was the direct result of or caused by enemy action. Thus, there is no new evidentiary basis to support award of the PH.
3. Further, there is insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the CIB. By regulation, in order to qualify to receive the CIB a member must have served in a qualifying infantry unit at such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. As indicated in the Board’s original decisional document, the evidence of record confirms that the applicant was assigned to aviation units and did not serve with a qualifying infantry unit during his RVN tour. As a result, he is not entitled to receive the CIB.
4. The applicant has failed to provide any new evidence that would cause a change to the original findings and recommendation of the Board. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ _____ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ _____ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_JA___ __YM__ __RO___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003090185 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1.PH | 107.0015.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008546
During its original review of this case, the Board found the applicant failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was wounded as a result of enemy action or that he engaged the enemy in combat while serving as an infantryman in an infantry unit. It states that in order to support award of the CIB there must be evidence the member held and served in an infantry MOS; that he served in an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021914
Item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 is blank and the PH and CIB are not included among the list of awards shown in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). His record is void of any orders or other documents that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, and there are no medical treatment records on file that show he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury as a result of enemy action. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006156C070206
During its original deliberations in this case, the Board concluded that the evidence of record confirmed the applicant was assigned to an Aviation unit while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), and as a result he failed to meet one of the basic criteria for the award of the CIB, which was assignment to a qualifying infantry unit. Therefore, the Board concluded there was insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim of entitlement to the CIB and PH. The applicant's and his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000573
It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of that treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The evidence of record contains no entries or documents that corroborate the applicant's claim that he was wounded as a result of enemy action while serving in the RVN. Therefore, absent...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009862C080407
It is also void of any medical treatment records that indicate the applicant was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving on active duty. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087345C070212
The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not include the PH that he received for being wounded in action on 23 November 1967, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), or the CIB he was entitled to based on his service with an infantry unit. However, although the record confirms he served in and participated in combat action in the RVN with a qualifying infantry unit, it also verifies that while serving in this unit, he was assigned duties in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016410
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 19 September 1967 through 28 November 1968. As a result, the evidence does not support award of the PH. The applicant and all others concerned should know this action related to award of the PH and CIB in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016100
Item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 is blank and the PH and CIB are not included among the list of awards shown in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The awards regulation stipulates that combat service alone is not sufficient to support award of the CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069889C070402
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any award recommendations, orders, or other documents that would indicate the applicant was recommended for, awarded, or entitled to receive the CIB, PH, BSM, or SS. The Parachutist Badge, CIB, PH, BSM, and SS were not included in this list of authorized awards included in the separation document. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant successfully completed the basic airborne course, and as a result was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100565C070208
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Separation Document (WD AGO 53-55), dated 13 January 1946; Separation Document (DD Form 214), dated 30 September 1969; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision with Self-Authored Statement, dated 27 January 1999; and Medical Treatment Record, dated 17 November 2003. The record further shows the applicant served on active duty during the period November 1951 through September 1952 as a member of the...