Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090048C070212
Original file (2003090048C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090048

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Medical Badge (CMB).

2. The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the CMB based on his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and the award was left off of his separation document (DD Form 214).

3. The applicant provides a copy of his 12 August 1967 DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of the awards listed on his DD Form 214 that occurred on 12 August 1967. The application submitted in this case is dated 16 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 21 September 1965. He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).

4. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he served in the RVN from 29 August 1966 through 11 August 1967. During his tour in the RVN, he was assigned to the 874th Medical Detachment, 43rd Medical Group, and he performed duties in MOS 91B as an ambulance driver.

5. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 lists the following awards he earned during his tenure on active duty: Vietnam Service Medal (VSM); National Defense Service Medal (NDSM); Vietnam Service Medal (VSM); RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with 60 Device; Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge; and 2 Overseas Bars. The applicant signed this document in Item 47 (Signature of Individual) confirming that the
DA Form 20 was created in September 1965 and that he last audited the information on the record on 31 March 1967.


6. On 12 August 1967, the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee after completing a total of 2 year, 10 months, and
22 days of active military service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) lists the following awards that he earned while serving on active duty: NDSM; VSM; RVCM with 60 Device; Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge; and
2 Overseas Bars.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 contains the Army’s awards policy. Paragraph
2-13 contains guidance on award of the VSM. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited for based on his service in the RVN. Appendix B shows that based on his tenure of service in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to be credited with participation in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II, Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, and TET Counteroffensive 1968 campaigns.

8. Chapter 8 of the awards regulation contains guidance on awarding Badges and Tabs of United States origin. Paragraph 8-7 contains guidance on the
CMB. It states that the CMB was created as a "companion" badge to the CIB with criteria for its award intended to parallel that of the CIB. It was designed to provide recognition to the field medic who accompanies the infantryman into battle and shares with him the experiences unique to the infantry in combat. It further states that there was never any intention to award the CMB to all medical personnel who serve in a combat zone or imminent danger area.

9. The awards regulation specifies that in order to be eligible for the CMB, medical personnel must be assigned or attached by appropriate orders to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or to a medical unit of company or smaller size, organic to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period the infantry unit is engaged in actual ground combat, provided they are personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

10. Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to the RVN from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The record shows that the applicant served as a medical specialist in the RVN; however, there is no evidence that suggests he was assigned or attached to a qualifying infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, or that his medical detachment was organic to a qualifying infantry unit. As a result, the evidence fails to confirm he was eligible to receive the CMB.

2. Records show the applicant should have discovered the perceived error related to award of the CMB now under consideration on 12 August 1967; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 12 August 1970. However, he did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse his failure to file in regard to that issue.

3. However, evidence does show that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished
by the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ _MM___ __JS___ __BE DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the award of the CMB, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.

2. The Board did determine that administrative errors in the record of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the ARBA Support Division-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to 3 bronze service stars with his Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and issuing him a corrected separation document that includes these awards.



                  John N. Slone
         CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090048
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/11/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1967/08/12
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Overseas Returnee
BOARD DECISION DENY (Admin Correction)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 46 107.0000
2. 159 107.0113
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007981C070208

    Original file (20040007981C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the MUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010106C071029

    Original file (20060010106C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. However, there are no orders, or other documents on file that show he was ever recommended for, or awarded either the CIB or CMB while he was serving on active duty. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s combat service in the RVN; however, combat service alone does not support award of the CMB or CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011556

    Original file (20060011556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record does show that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 1 silver service star with his VSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017278C071029

    Original file (20060017278C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017278 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010460

    Original file (20080010460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to the list of awards on his separation document (DD Form 214). The record is void of orders awarding the applicant the CMB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 25 October 1966 through 17 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017104C071108

    Original file (20060017104C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017104 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show award of the CMB. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002800C070206

    Original file (20050002800C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Air Medal (AM) and Combat Medical Badge (CMB). It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each RVN campaign a member is credited with participating in. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was awarded the Combat Medical Badge, Bronze Star Medal, and Parachutist Badge; by showing he is entitled to the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008105

    Original file (20130008105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CMB is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for the period 13 December 1966 to 5 December 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a...