Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089568C070403
Original file (2003089568C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 24 February 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089568


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member
Mr. Lawrence Foster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his military records be corrected by canceling his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) participation for “person with insurable interest." He also requests, in effect, that he be refunded all premiums paid.

2. The applicant states that when he filled out the form he was told he needed a survivor listed to receive his last check and any insurance. He contends that he listed his sister because he had no wife or children.

3. The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on
6 August 1990. The application submitted in this case is dated 3 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant was born on 29 December 1942. He enlisted in the Utah Army National Guard on 8 December 1963.

4. The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was prepared on 2 February 1984. On 17 February 1984, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) electing to participate in the RCSBP with coverage for his sister as a person with insurable interest, option B, full base amount. Section II (Marital, Dependency, and Election Status) of the DD Form 1883 lists the available coverage options, including "None."

5. On 6 August 1990, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).

6. On 29 December 2002, the applicant turned age 60. On 3 April 2003, he applied to this Board for termination of his RCSBP coverage and reimbursement of his paid premiums.

7. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. A person who is not married and does not have a dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP may elect to provide an annuity to a natural person with an insurable interest in the member. Premiums for insurable interest coverage are generally higher than for any other category of coverage.

8. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(1)(B) provides that an SBP election of insurable interest may be terminated. Participation in the SBP shall be discontinued effective on the first day of the first month following the month in which the request for termination is received by the Secretary concerned. Section 1448(b)(1)(E) provides that premiums may not be refunded.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record shows that in February 1984, while serving in the rank of staff sergeant, the applicant elected RCSBP coverage for his sister, a person with insurable interest. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he elected this coverage based upon erroneous guidance or improper counseling. One of the RCSBP coverage options available to him was "None."

2. The law provides that an SBP election for an insurable interest beneficiary may be terminated at any time without the concurrence of the beneficiary.

3. The applicant applied to this Board on 3 April 2003 to terminate his SBP coverage. It would be equitable to correct his records to show he requested termination of his SBP coverage on that date and to refund to him paid premiums retroactive to the first day of the first month following that date (i.e., 1 May 2003).

4. It would not be equitable to correct the applicant's records to show he never enrolled in the SBP. Had he died prior to making this request, his beneficiary could have used the DD Form 1883 to lay claim to the SBP annuity.

BOARD VOTE:

RVO____ MVT____ LF______ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

         a. correcting his records to show he requested termination of his SBP coverage on 3 April 2003 and that such termination became effective on 1 May 2003; and

         b. refunding to the applicant all paid SBP premiums retroactive to 1 May 2003.

2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his records to show he declined to participate in the SBP.





                  __Raymond V. O'Connor___
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089568
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040224
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007406

    Original file (20140007406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) at the time he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he elected RCSBP coverage for his spouse within a year of their marriage. In 2003, when he married, he had a 1-year period in which to submit an RCSBP election to provide coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020277

    Original file (20090020277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 June 2006, he completed a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) electing to participate in the RCSBP with coverage for his sister as a person with insurable interest, option C, full retired pay. The evidence of record shows in June 2006, the applicant elected RCSBP coverage for his sister, a person with insurable interest. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he requested termination of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006835

    Original file (20090006835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, dated 17 March 1995, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, October 5, 1994, Changed Provisions of the Uniformed Services Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), provided that SBP premiums will no longer apply as of the effective date of termination of NIP coverage except if the participant terminating insurable interest coverage is a participant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008539

    Original file (20080008539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He elected to participate in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) for natural person with insurable interest coverage (his sister, age 52, born on 27 February 1941), option C. The front side of the DD Form 1883 stated, “IMPORTANT: The decision you make with respect to participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan is a permanent irrevocable decision. The applicant's DD Form 149, dated 1 May 2008, is therefore accepted as sufficient to show he properly requested termination of his SBP natural...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060014769C071029

    Original file (AR20060014769C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the available evidence indicates that at some point, while she was a member of the UTARNG, she completed a DD Form 1883, electing to participate in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) and she named a natural person with insurable interest as her beneficiary. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, October 5, 1994; Changed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002077

    Original file (20110002077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, her military records be corrected to show she terminated her Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage for a natural interest person (NIP) on 7 August 1997. A letter, dated 12 December 2008, from DFAS states: a. on 15 August 1985, she elected NIP coverage under the RCSBP for her daughter. Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000270

    Original file (20140000270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The notification informed the applicant, in pertinent part, of the following: * having completed the required years of service, he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60 * he was entitled to participate in the RCSBP * he must provide written correspondence, a DD Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate), stating whom he designates as annuitant(s) * the cost for participation would commence upon his receipt of retired pay at age 60 3. If the reason for discontinuation in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021982

    Original file (20120021982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A person who is not married and does not have a dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP may elect to provide an annuity to a natural person with an insurable interest in the member. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management Policy) memorandum, dated 17 March 1995, subject: Sections 637 and 638 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, Public Law 103-337, dated 5 October 1994, Changed Provisions of the Uniformed Services...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062788C070421

    Original file (2001062788C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 March 1987, the FSM was counseled concerning the RCSBP and on that date completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) indicate that the DD Form 1883 was not on file and presumably was not forwarded to DFAS by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command when the FSM applied for retired pay. The DD Form 2656 provides an option not to participate; it does not provide an option to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002746

    Original file (20120002746.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He continues by stating that because he did not have a beneficiary his premiums should be refunded to him. On 11 May 2006, in connection with his application for retired pay, the applicant again elected his brother as his beneficiary under the SBP. The evidence of record shows that in May 1990 the applicant elected RCSBP coverage for his brother, a person with insurable interest.