Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089520C070403
Original file (2003089520C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 9 September 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089520

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Shirley L. Powell Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Thomas A. Pagan Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be separated under the provisions of the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA), effective 31 December 2001, in lieu of his current 21 May 2002 separation by reason of physical disability with severance pay.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was hoping that his 15 years of active duty service and the fact that he was processed for separation through the disability processing system would allow him to be granted retirement under TERA provisions in lieu of his current disability separation. He claims that due to long medical evaluation process, which was beyond his control, he could not apply for early retirement because TERA expired on 31 December 2001. In his application, he indicates that he enclosed copies of his Permanent Profile
(DA Form 3349) and Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings
(DA Form 199); however, these documents were not attached to the applicant’s application when it arrived at the Board for review.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant served on active duty from 30 July 1986 until he was honorably discharged on 21 May 2002. At that time, he held the rank of staff sergeant (SSG) and he had completed a total of 15 years, 9 months, and 22 days of active military service.

The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s disability processing are not on file. However, the record does contain a copy of the applicant’s separation document (DD Form 214), which was issued to him on the date of his discharge, 21 May 2002. This document confirms that he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 4-24b(3), Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of physical disability with severance pay. Item 18 (Remarks) contains an entry that indicates the applicant received disability severance pay in the amount of $59,983.20 upon his discharge.

Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3914 (10 USC 3914) provides the legal authority for the retirement of enlisted members with twenty to thirty years of service. It states that under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, an enlisted member of the Army who has at least 20, but less than 30, years of service may, upon his request, be retired.

Public Law 102-484 provided the Secretary of the Army TERA during the active force drawdown period by authorizing the application of the 10 USC 3914 provisions to enlisted members who had completed at least 15 but less than
20 years of service. TERA was in effect during the active force drawdown period beginning in October 1992 and ending on 31 December 2001.


DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should be retired under TERA, effective 31 December 2001, in lieu of his 21 May 2002 disability separation with severance pay. However, the Board finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to support this requested relief.

2. Although the facts and circumstances of the applicant’s disability processing are not on file, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 that was authenticated by the applicant with his signature on the date of his discharge. This document confirms that the applicant was discharged by reason of physical disability and that he received $59,983.20 of severance pay in connection with this discharge.

3. The evidence of record also is void of any indication that the applicant pursued retirement under TERA prior to or at anytime during his disability processing, or prior to the expiration date of the program on 31 December 2001. In addition, notwithstanding his assertion to the contrary, there is no evidence that indicates that his disability processing was unduly delayed or that any processing delays resulted in some injustice to him. By the applicant’s own admission, in addition to the severance pay he received at discharge, he is currently receiving disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs based on his service connected disabilities. Thus, the Board finds no evidence of error or injustice related to his disability separation or to the associated compensation he received.

4. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met, and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout his disability processing.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

_____ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_WTM___ __TAP__ __SLP__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089520
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/08/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 2002/05/21
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-40
DISCHARGE REASON Disability with Severance Pay
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 338 136.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001915C070205

    Original file (20060001915C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 September 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060001915 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The law stated, in pertinent part, that “During the active force drawdown period, the Secretary of the Army may apply the provisions of Section 3914, Title 10, United States Code to allow early retirement of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010572

    Original file (20080010572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was medically boarded at more than 17 years of military service and discharged. The PEB awarded the applicant a 20 percent disability rating and recommended his separation with severance pay, in accordance with the USPDA’s "Guidance to Rating Pain" policy, dated 25 March 1999. It also provided that an enlisted member with at least 15 years, but less than 20 years of service could be retired for length of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005494

    Original file (20140005494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she received a 15-year retirement under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA). The law stated that “During the active force drawdown period, the Secretary of the Army may apply the provisions of Section 3914, Title 10, U. S. Code to allow early retirement of an enlisted member with at least 15 years but less than 20 years of service. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012028

    Original file (20140012028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record is void of medical documentation that indicates that aside from "left tibia stress fracture and persistent leg pain," he was suffering from an unfitting PTSD condition or any other unfitting medical condition during his active duty service. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014650

    Original file (20090014650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that she was retired by reason of permanent disability. It appears based on the available evidence that the applicant did not want to accept severance pay for her service and elected instead to apply for early retirement under the TERA. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028826

    Original file (20100028826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would like his DD Form 214 to show the proper disability rating at the time of his retirement. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, dated 31 December 2001, and a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings). His DD Form 214 appropriately shows he was retired on 31 December 2001 for the purpose of early retirement under TERA with a type of separation of "Voluntary Early Retirement"; a separation authority of "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12"; a separation code of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016189

    Original file (20100016189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A disability rating of 30% or higher as determined by the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) entitles a Soldier to retirement benefits. The PEB thus determined she was physically unfit for further military service and recommended separation with entitlement to severance pay. Her narrative reason for separation and her separation code were assigned based on the fact that she was retired under the provisions of chapter 12 of Army Regulation 635-200 under the TERA program subsequent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011054

    Original file (20070011054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official stated that based on the applicant's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, only 19 years of qualifying service for retired pay could be verified and therefore, her request for retired pay was denied. However, TERA provisions of the law in effect at the time of the applicant's transfer to the Retired Reserve provided for granting non-regular retirement at age 60 eligibility to those members of the Reserve who had completed 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008351

    Original file (20080008351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The evidence or record also shows that the PEB considered the applicant’s medical conditions described in his medical records and the evidence presented at that time. Based on a review of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088381C070212

    Original file (2003088381C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years active service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. The available records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 3 February 1998; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error...