| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | ||
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was only 17 years old when he enlisted in the Army and that he was initially not accepted for enlistment due to medical reasons. He further states that he enlisted so he could go to Vietnam; however, he was ordered to the hospital before he was allowed to complete his basic combat training (BCT). He concludes by stating that at the time he enlisted he had many problems and that he had escaped from a boys school that was located in Vermont.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 21 November 1968, he underwent a medical examination for the purpose of enlistment in the Army. He was initially found to be unqualified for enlistment due acne on his back and shoulder and because he was fourteen pounds overweight.
The applicant requested a waiver of his weight condition and on 23 December 1968, he was granted a waiver for enlistment in the Army.
On 23 December 1968, he enlisted in the Army at age 17, with parental consent, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.
The applicant was still in BCT when he absented himself without leave (AWOL) on 17 January 1969. He remained absent until he returned to military control on 20 January 1969.
He went AWOL on 27 January 1969 and he remained absent until he returned to military control on 13 May 1969.
The applicant went AWOL again on 26 May 1969 and he was dropped from the rolls as a deserter on 1 September 1969. He remained absent until he was apprehended by civil authorities and charged with two counts of assault with a dangerous weapon and 1 count of defacing property. He was returned to military control on 3 March 1973 and he was placed in pretrial confinement.
On 8 May 1973, the applicant was convicted pursuant to his pleas by a general court-martial of being AWOL on the dates mentioned above. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 6 months and a BCD.
On 5 June 1973, the convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. However, on 6 August 1973, the unexecuted portion of the sentence to confinement was remitted as modified by the action of The Judge Advocate General and he was restored to duty pending completion of appellate review.
On 9 August 1974, The Judge Advocate General affirmed the findings and the sentence as approved by the convening authority. Accordingly, on 9 January 1975, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 11 as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed general
court-martial conviction. He had completed 1 years, 5 month and 22 days of total active service and he was furnished a BCD.
On 16 January 1976, the applicant’s Report of Separation was corrected to reflect he was issued a Clemency Discharge pursuant to Presidential Proclamation Number 4313.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11 of that regulation states, in pertinent part, that a member will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial, after completion of appellate review and after such affirmed sentence has been ordered duly executed.
Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to modify the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant was properly discharged pursuant to a sentence by a general court-martial conviction with no indication of any violations of any of his rights.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, he enlisted in the Army at age 17 with parental consent and he requested a waiver of his disqualifications and it was granted. He failed to complete his basic training because he began to go AWOL 24 days after he enlisted in the Army. The charges against him were too serious and his record of service is too undistinguished to warrant relief in his case.
4. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of the request.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jhl___ ___ao___ __mkp___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089503 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/10/23 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19750109 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 11 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 675/BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 678 | 144.6803/SERIOUS OFFENSE - BCD |
| 2. 708 | 144.7100/AWOL |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064948C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his general court-martial (GCM) conviction be set aside and his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082132C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081154C070215
On 28 January 1971, the United States Court of Military Appeals denied the applicant's petition for grant of review. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The applicant successfully completed all of his training requirements and he served in an active duty status for more than a year; he was not an entry-level status soldier.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017345
The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by special and general courts-martial of being AWOL for a total of 1,853 days. On 17 December 1973, he was discharged pursuant to the sentence of his general court-martial and he was issued a bad conduct discharge after the sentence was affirmed. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020899
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100020899 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 28 April 1971, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 2, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Separations), for Other Than Desertion (Court-Martial), with a BCD, in pay grade E-1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, stated a general discharge was a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008551
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. General Court-Martial Order Number 33, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, KY, dated 6 June 1973, shows he was found guilty, on 18 January 1973, of an unknown number of specifications and charges,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007972C070206
Naomi Henderson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his Bad Conduct Discharge from his second enlistment be upgraded to honorable, based on his honorable discharge from his first enlistment. On 9 November 1972, the United States Army Court of Military Review upheld the sentence as approved by the convening authority.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025159
The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge or a general discharge under honorable conditions. On 16 October 1970, the applicant was issued a bad conduct discharge. He completed 2 years, 5 months, and 25 days of active service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074155C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: He was placed in confinement upon his last return to military control and charges were preferred against him for the AWOL offenses on 24 September 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019762
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019762 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On an unknown date, the applicant's chain of command recommended the applicant be discharged by reason of unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability), then in effect. On 10 March 1976, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206...