| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas A. Pagan | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his rank be restored to him.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was unjustly reduced from the pay grade of E-4 to the pay grade of E-2 for spending a night in Saigon. He further states that he spent 20 months in Vietnam and was severely punished for something that was openly done by enlisted men and officers as well. He goes on to state that he has suffered the disgrace of his reduction for over 30 years and was afraid to face military justice at the time for fear of being transferred to a dangerous combat unit if he demanded trial by court-martial.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in Altoona, Pennsylvania, on 13 September 1968 for a period of 3 years and training as a stock control and accounting specialist. He successfully completed his training and was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 10 January 1969. He was transferred to Vietnam on 30 June 1969.
On 5 December 1970, while serving with the United States Army Mortuary – Saigon, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for being in a Vietnamese establishment in Saigon during the hours of curfew (violation of a lawful regulation). His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2 and he did not appeal the punishment. He also did not demand trial by court-martial nor did he submit matters in extenuation, mitigation or defense.
He was reassigned to the 5th Light Equipment Maintenance Company on 7 January 1971, where he remained until he was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, for honorable release from active duty (REFRAD) as an early overseas returnee on 27 April 1971. He was REFRAD in the pay grade of E-2 and was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) where he remained until he was honorably discharged on 1 June 1974.
Army Regulation 27-10 prescribes the procedures for administration of military justice. Paragraph 3-18 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that punishment will not be imposed unless the commander is convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the soldier committed the offense. If the commander decides to impose the punishment he or she will announce the punishment to the soldier and explain the soldier’s appellate rights and procedures.
Paragraph 3-23 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that the imposing commander, a successor in command or the next superior authority may remit, mitigate, suspend, vacate or set aside punishments imposed under NJP.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. It appears that the NJP was imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies by a commander empowered to do so. The punishment was not disproportionate to the offense and there is no evidence of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
3. The applicant was afforded the opportunity to demand trial by court-martial, whereas he could have asserted his innocence before a jury of his peers and elected not to do so. He was also afforded the opportunity to submit matters in his own defense and to appeal his punishment. He elected not to do either.
4. While the applicant may now believe that he did the wrong thing by not challenging the charges against him, he has provided no evidence to show that he was unjustly punished for violation of a lawful regulation.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__wtm___ ___tap __ ___slp __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089226 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/09 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 322 | 133.0000/REDUCTION IN GRD |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066316C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089181C070403
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: This enlistment document shows that he participated in the MGIB upon his enlistment and it appears that the period of active duty service he completed and the honorable discharge he received would satisfy the criteria for receipt of this education benefit. There appears to be no error in the record that would result in the applicant being denied MGIB benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008041
During the period of August 2003 to March 2004, the applicant was counseled for a variety of offenses which included disobeying a lawful order from his company commander, being absent from his place of duty, missing physical training, being late for work, for making a threat to kill another Soldier, and for forging a noncommissioned officers initials to indicate that he had completed his command task testing. On 19 May 2005, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060006759C070205
Counsel requests the removal of the NJP from the applicant’s records. Personnel serving in the pay grade of E-4 or below, with less than 3 years of service will have the Record of NJP (DA Form 2627) filed in the local unit military justice files. Army Regulation 27-10 also provides, in pertinent part, that in regards to NJP, the Soldier will be advised of their right to consult with counsel and the location of counsel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079799C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board has noted the applicant's contentions that the presence of the NJP in his OMPF may affect his ability to obtain a security clearance; however, that is not a basis to remove a duly imposed and properly filed record of NJP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007825
The applicant's records show his first Article 15 was placed in the performance section of his OMPF in September 2004. There is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence to show that keeping the DA Form 2627 in the performance section of his OMPF is unjust. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007825 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100007825 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509965C070209
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: After serving 2 years and 10 months of prior service, the applicant again enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 May 1989 for a period of 6 years. The applicants contention that he was denied the opportunity to submit matters relevant to his appeal is also without merit. The applicant has provided no evidence to show that he was denied the opportunity to submit matters in his own behalf with his appeal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063541C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the setting aside of all punishment imposed by nonjudicial punishment on 18 December 1998, the removal of the Record of Proceedings of Nonjudicial Punishment (DA Form 2627) and all related documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), correction of a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) covering the period from June 1998 to January 1999, Reinstatement of his Special Qualification Identifier (SQI) of “X” and Drill Sergeant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008191C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed against her on 26 January 2004 be set aside, that she be restored to the pay grade of E-6 and that the Board direct the imposing officer to provide her with a written letter of apology. On 26 January 2004, the imposing commander imposed a reduction to the pay grade of E-5 and directed that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the Restricted Fiche of her OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002473C070206
On 23 April 2002, the applicant’s trial defense counsel submitted a memorandum through the applicant’s chain of command requesting that the imposition of NJP be suspended until the applicant had the opportunity to attend in-patient treatment for alcoholism at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC). On 25 April 2002, NJP was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order from his commander to abstain from alcohol. Personnel serving in the pay grade of E-4 or below, with less...