| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicant states that his physician had instructed him not to return to active duty with the Army following his medical treatment. He contends that he was still under medical rehabilitation when the Army wanted him "back to duty with them." He states that when he first got out of the Army he needed to make a living for himself, but now that he is settled he wants to have his discharge corrected. In support of his request he submits copies of medical treatment documents during his hospitalization in January 1983 as a result of severe injury to his left knee.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in March 1981 under the Army's Delayed Enlistment Program and entered active duty on 23 June 1981. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and in December 1981 was assigned to Fort Carson, Colorado. In June 1982 he was promoted to pay grade E-2 and in August 1982 he was promoted to pay grade E-3.
On 31 December 1982 the applicant departed AWOL (absent without leave). On 8 January 1983, while in an AWOL status, the applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident (he was hit by another vehicle while bending over the hood of his own vehicle). He sustained a severe injury to the back of his left knee, which required surgery and a skin graft. On 16 February 1983 he was released from the hospital and, according to information contained in his military personnel file, surrendered to military authorities on 12 April 1983.
When charges were preferred, the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request acknowledged he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge, which he might receive. He indicated he understood he could be denied some or all veterans' benefits as a result of his discharge and that he may be deprived of rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law. In a statement to his commander, he indicated that he departed AWOL and remained AWOL "due to his inability to follow military procedure." The commander also noted that the applicant had been hospitalized while in an AWOL status but "did not inform his unit of his whereabouts."
The applicant's request was approved and on 29 June 1983 the applicant was separated under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10. He had 1 year, 10 months, and 4 days of creditable service and more than 60 days of lost time. His records indicate that the time the applicant was hospitalized was not charged as lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement. The applicant departed AWOL, was injured while in an AWOL status, and failed to inform his unit of his whereabouts until he returned to military control in April 1983. His contention that his medical condition prevented him from returning to military duty, and should somehow excuse his entire period of AWOL is without foundation.
DISCUSSION: The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 29 June 1983, the date the applicant was discharged. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 June 1986.
The application is dated 19 March 2003 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.
DETERMINATION: The subject application was not submitted within the time required. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law. Prior to reaching this determination the Board looked at the applicant's entire file. It was only after all aspects of his case had been considered and it had been concluded that there was no basis to recommend a correction of his record that the Board considered the statute of limitations. Had the Board determined that an error or injustice existed it would have recommended relief in spite of the applicant's failure to submit his application within the three-year time limit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JLP __ __AAO__ __PHM__ CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089188 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030923 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002324
The applicant requests his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge or a medical discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge was authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally issued to an individual who was discharged for the good of the service. There is no evidence showing what medications he was administered while hospitalized.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011095
On 15 August 1983, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued a UOTHC discharge certificate. He had completed a total of 1 year, 3 months, and 9 days of creditable active military service and had accrued a total of 165 days of time lost due to AWOL and confinement. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009217
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. However, there is insufficient evidence to substantiate his contention that the electrical shock that he sustained was the cause of his acts of misconduct. The available evidence show that it was not until 2008/2009 that he alleged a personality change which is almost 24 years after his discharge from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012259
He states he served honorably in the Army for more than 3 years before he requested discharge due to compelling circumstances. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 20 June 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The period of AWOL...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064320C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001263C070206
The applicant provides: a. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. Ronald E. Blakely ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20050001263 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20050927 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF DISCHARGE 19840502 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 C10 DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION GRANT REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001263C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006670C070205
However, the evidence of record shows he was confined by civilian authorities from 31 December 1981 through 14 January 1982. In the absence of evidence that would enable this Board to determine whether his absence (civil confinement) was excused as unavoidable or whether his absence was not excused as unavoidable, the applicant’s period of civil confinement is presumed to be lost time. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant the applicant payment for his lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012074
The applicant contends that that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to honorable because he was hospitalized at the time his unit showed him to be AWOL. The medical evidence provided by the applicant is insufficient to show he was improperly reported as AWOL at the time of his accident and subsequent admission to the hospital. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019052
The applicant's request for a discharge upgrade has been carefully reviewed and determined to be without merit. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019052 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080019052 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...