| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Klaus P. Schumann | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her request to correct her deceased spouse's, a former service member (FSM), records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that it was her husband's intention to enroll her into SBP during the open enrollment period conducted from March 1999 - February 2000.
3. In support of her application, the applicant provides a letter to the Defense Finance & Accounting Service (DFAS), dated 28 January 1999, which she contends supports her claim that her deceased husband intended to enroll in SBP for spouse coverage and a marriage certificate, dated 2 June 1975.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2002076608, on 10 October 2002.
2. The applicant married the FSM on 2 June 1975. On 28 January 1999, the FSM designated the applicant as the beneficiary for his unpaid retired pay. He died on 26 January 2001.
3. The FSM in a letter to DFAS, dated 28 January 1999, indicated in effect, that he understood that he should have enrolled in SBP during the first year after his marriage to the applicant and that it was his intention to enroll in SBP during the next open season.
4. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
5. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married or has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP. Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.
6. Public Law 97-35, Public Law 101-189, Public Law 101-510 and Public Law 105-261 established three Open Season's for the periods 1 October 1981 -
30 September 1982, 1 April 1992 - 31 March 1993, 1 April 1992 - 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 - 29 February 2000, respectively.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In his 28 January 1999 letter to the DFAS, the FSM stated his intent to enroll in the SBP during the next open season period. However, the governing law stipulates, in effect, that a person who marries after obtaining eligibility for the SBP must submit his written election to enroll within a year of his marriage, or during any Open Season.
2. In this case, the FSM married the applicant on 2 June 1975. There is no evidence in the FSM records and the applicant did not present any additional evidence which shows that the FSM took any formal action to enroll in SBP within the year after married as is required by law, or during any of the authorized Open Season periods. Further, there is no indication that SBP enrollment was attempted by the FSM in the more than 20 years that passed between the enrollment eligibility period and his January 1999 letter to the DFAS. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to grant the requested relief in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
•
_RKS___ __SAC___ __CLG__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089176 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | AR2002076608 |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/12/03 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | N/A |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | N/A |
| DISCHARGE REASON | N/A |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 346 | 137.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004639
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 6 September 1985.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007842
She states the FSM told her he could not elect spouse coverage under the SBP because they were divorced when he retired from the Army. The FSM did not elect to provide SBP spouse coverage within 1 year of their remarriage. The letter from DFAS, dated 29 January 2010, stated that because the courts have conclusively determined that the applicant was the legal spouse of the FSM at the time of his death, the FSM's open enrollment election of SBP coverage for E___ l as his spouse must be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006132
Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The FSM retired on 1 October 1979. There is no evidence of record to show it was the FSM's intent to provide the SBP to the applicant.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011056
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her earlier petition to the Board requesting the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. However, the evidence of record gives no indication that the FSM ever submitted an SBP election form to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007260
The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to spouse coverage during an Open Season from 1992 through 1993. The FSM retired on 31 August 1985 and he elected dependent child only coverage. The available evidence shows the FSM made a written request to add the applicant to his SBP coverage.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008441
The applicant, the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's records to show she is entitled to Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits. The applicant provides copies of: * two self-authored Petitions * birth certificates for the FSM, herself, and their son * her and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Retirement Orders * the FSMs DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * the FSM's certificate of death * a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003841C070205
Records at DFAS show the applicant enrolled in the SBP for NIP coverage on 1 September 1973 during the first Open Season. As a retiree, the applicant should have been receiving Army Echoes, which provided information on five SBP Open Seasons conducted after he was married. Nevertheless, at the time of the applicant’s retirement in July 1972, he was a private E-2 and was probably unaware of his responsibility to change his SBP coverage when he married in 1975.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012872
The FSM married the applicant on 26 October 2000. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS to a Member of Congress, dated 5 June 2013, which stated: * the FSM retired on 1 September 1997 * he was not married at the time, but he had minor children and he elected children only SBP coverage * he married the applicant on 26 October 2000, but he did not notify DFAS within 1 year of that marriage that he wished to elect spouse SBP coverage * his lack of an SBP election constitutes a declination...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068150C070402
It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law. The FSM retired before the SBP was established. He underwent his first carotid endarterectomy in March 1982 but it appears he had no further transient ischemic attack symptoms until October 1983 (at which time a neurological examination revealed him to be alert and to have good comprehension).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005149
She adds that she only found out after his death that he never discussed the SBP with her or elected SBP coverage for her. On 20 October 2003, the FSM married his second spouse, the applicant. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the FSM made an SBP election for children only coverage.