Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089147C070403
Original file (2003089147C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 25 September 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003089147


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Luis Almodova Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests, in effect, that she be paid full separation pay.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that her counselor never informed her of any paperwork that was required for her to collect her separation pay. After her discharge, the applicant states that she obtained her United States citizenship and reenlisted in the Army. The applicant submitted a copy of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; and a copy of her DD
Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, dated 6 March 2003, in support of her application.

4. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 March 1992 and she remained on active duty through three enlistments. The applicant was honorably discharged on 18 January 2000 in the rank and pay grade, Sergeant, E-5, at the completion of required active service. On the date of her discharge, she had completed 7 years, 9 months, and 25 days active Federal service.

5. Block 26 (Separation Code) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the code, "JBK." An entry, "Separation Pay - $15012.99" is shown in Block 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214.

6. Orders 291-004, published by the Camp Casey Transition Center, APO AP 96224-018, dated 18 October 1999, shows the following in the additional instructions:

"(b) Soldier is entitled to Full Separation Pay IAW [in accordance with] DA Circular 635-92-1. Contact the Finance personnel in Building 2710, Camp Mobile ***upon receipt of your clearance papers ***.

(i) Payment of Full Separation Pay is contingent upon your entering into a written agreement to serve in the Ready Reserve for a period of not less than 3 years.

(j) Upon receipt of these orders you must arrange for an appointment to see a Reserve Components Career Counselor, in Building 2409, phone number 730-3140."

7. The applicant was contacted by a member of the staff and inquired if the applicant had made application to finance officials for payment of the separation pay and to determine if she had taken action to enlist in a unit of the Ready Reserve on her separation from the Regular Army. The applicant responded that


she had tried to enlist in the Ready Reserve but because at the time she was a resident alien, she did not meet the citizenship eligibility criteria. Because she could not enlist in a Ready Reserve unit for a period of three years or more, finance advised her, verbally, that they could not pay her the separation pay indicated in her DD Form 214.

8. The applicant has reenlisted and is currently serving in the Regular Army in the rank and pay grade, Sergeant, E-5.

9. Army Regulation (AR) 635-5-1 provides the Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes that are used with various authorities for separation that are to be entered on the DD Form 214 at the time of separation. This regulation provides, in pertinent part, that the SPD Code of "JBK" is used when the authority for voluntary discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, due to "Completion of Required Service" for Regular Army soldiers who are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment who are separated on completion of enlistment.

10. The applicant, at the time of her service, was an alien who had been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence and was not a citizen of the United States.

11. Paragraph 3-8.b., AR 601-280, states that citizenship is a nonwaivable criterion for reenlistment. It continues that, if the alien will have in excess of 8 years of Federal military service (excluding DEP (Delayed Entry Program) after 1 January 1985) at the expiration of the period for which they are seeking to reenlist, they are disqualified from reenlistment.

12. Department of the Army Circular 635-92-1 (Separation Pay) outlines the eligibility criteria for separation pay. This Circular provides, in pertinent part, that full separation pay is authorized for soldiers who have completed at least 6 years, but fewer than 20 years of active service; the soldier's service is characterized as Honorable; and is being involuntarily separated as a result of denial of reenlistment.

13. Item 5.b., Citizenship, of the applicant's DD Form 1966/1,Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States, with an enlistment date of 6 March 2003, shows that the applicant has become a naturalized U.S. citizen through the naturalization process. The applicant's recruiter, as attested to in Item 30.c. (2) of the applicant's DD Form 1966/3, verified this information.


CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant completed her enlistment obligation and was honorably discharged. The evidence of record shows that she was otherwise fully eligible to reenlist but was precluded from reenlisting in the Regular Army or in the Reserve because she did not meet citizenship requirements.

2. The Board believes that the applicant tried to fulfill her obligation to enlist in a Ready Reserve unit but because she did not meet the citizenship criterion, she was denied the opportunity to qualify for payment of separation pay. The Board's belief stems from the fact that the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army when she attained her U.S. Citizenship.

3. The Board also believes that because she was not given the opportunity to enlist in a Ready Reserve unit that she was consequently unjustly denied payment of separation pay to which she was entitled.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant met all eligibility criteria of DA Circular 635-92-1 and was entitled to payment of full separation pay in the amount of $15012.99 as of the date of her discharge, 18 January 2000.

BOARD VOTE:

____js __ __lds____ ___rks__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  _____John N. Slone______
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003089147
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/09/25
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 283 128.0000
2. 297 128.1400
3.
4.
5.
6.



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004572

    Original file (20110004572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 shows in: * item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) she had no Reserve obligation when she was discharged * item 25 (Separation Authority) - Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) , chapter 4 * item 26 (Separation Code) - "JBK" * item 27 (RE Code) - "4" 7. The version in effect at the time of her discharge stated Soldiers with less than 10 years of active Federal service would be reenlisted for 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 years of service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081790C070215

    Original file (2002081790C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time of his discharge, his report of separation (DD Form 214) indicated that he would receive separation pay in the amount of $15,563.10; however, he never received the separation pay and has since been informed that his separation code of "JCP" is incorrect and thus prevents him from receiving separation pay. It provides, in pertinent part, that one-half separation pay is authorized for soldiers who are not fully qualified for retention, are denied reenlistment and separate on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079332C070215

    Original file (2002079332C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that soldiers denied continuation on active duty under established Retention Control Point (RCP) provisions and separated at ETS are authorized full separation, pay provided the soldier has signed a Department of the Army Form 7154-R (Agreement to Join Ready Reserve) for a period of not less than 3 years. Therefore, the Board finds that he should receive full separation pay for his service and his records should be corrected to reflect a SPD Code of "JBK" and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090709C070212

    Original file (2003090709C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he receive separation pay and benefits for his service. While it would have been appropriate at the time to do so because the applicant would not have had to attend training, the evidence suggests that after 12+ years that have elapsed and the fact that the applicant is now 40 years of age, it would also be in the interest of justice to grant the applicant an exception to policy by not requiring him to serve in the Ready Reserve as a condition of receiving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019150

    Original file (20090019150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 11 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019150 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was authorized separation pay upon her discharge in January 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020775

    Original file (20120020775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * Certificate of Birth and Baptism * his Social Security card * United States of America Permanent Resident card CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 28 May 1970, contained in the applicant's military service records shows in item 22 (Citizenship) the entry "CANADA."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004375C070206

    Original file (20050004375C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his United States Army Reserve (USAR) reenlistment contract dated 4 December 2004 be voided and reverted back to the terms of his original contract. The applicant’s records contain a DA Form 4856 (Developmental Counseling Statement) which shows the applicant met with his Retention NCO to discuss his option regarding his reenlistment contract. The applicant further explained that when he inquired about his reenlistment bonus, he was notified that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083793C070212

    Original file (2003083793C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 1 May 2003 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003083793 Neither the basic regulation nor any of its 14 changes required that information concerning a member's citizenship status be listed in the Remarks section. The applicant provides sufficient supporting evidence and there is evidence of record to show he was not an alien at the time he was inducted into the Army but rather a naturalized citizen.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016724

    Original file (20080016724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized separation pay upon his discharge in May 1983. On 4 October 1981, the commander of the Soldier who accidently fired his weapon submitted a report of disciplinary or administrative action and indicated that the aggravated assault was unfounded and that a written reprimand/admonition was rendered to that Soldier for dereliction of duty. With respect to the applicant's contention that the Board should conduct an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005985C070205

    Original file (20060005985C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further states that after his disenrollment, his school sent him a letter in 2003 stating that he was in breach of contract as described in DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract), page 7, sections 9 and 10. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR), as a cadet, on 18 January 2001, and was contracted under the ROTC Scholarship Cadet Program. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, it would be equitable to amend his...