| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Carolyn Wade | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge he was promised for his service in Vietnam.
2. The applicant states that his superiors in Vietnam told him he would receive the Combat Infantryman Badge before he became a door gunner with the 174th Aviation Company. He states that he now suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge would help prove his duties in Vietnam.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and a copy of his Citation for the Air Medal, with 1-23 Oak Leaf Clusters.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of error or injustice which occurred on 8 September 1968. The application submitted in this case is dated 25 March 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 February 1966. Following completion of all required military training, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67A, Aircraft Maintenance Crewman, and was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas.
4. On or about 10 February 1967, the applicant was assigned to the 174th Aviation Company, Republic of Vietnam with principal duty in MOS 67A.
5. On or about 28 July 1967, the applicant's DA Form 20 shows his principal duty was changed to "Gunner, MOS 11B." It also shows he was awarded MOS 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, on 23 September 1967. He continued serving with the 174th Aviation Company until he left the Republic of Vietnam on 4 September 1968.
6. On 8 September 1968, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). He was credited with 2 years, 7 months, and 5 days of military service.
7. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following awards: the National Defense Service Medal, the Air Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, three Overseas Service Bars, and the Aircraft Crewman Badge (P).
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. The Awards Branch of the Total Army Personnel Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.
9. U.S Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal. It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations. It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours. Twenty-five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal. However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point. Nothing created an entitlement to the award. There was no provision for making the award simply because an aircraft was struck by enemy fire.
10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for the period 22 April to 20 August 1967, Department of the Army General Order Number 43, 1972 and the Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm for the period 27 March 1967 to 17 May 1968 by Department of the Army General Order Number 46, dated 1969, amended Department of the Army General Order Number 21, 1969.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant apparently served in MOS 11B (according to his DA Form 20) while serving in Vietnam, there are no orders or other evidence that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, or that he was actively engaged in ground combat while serving with an infantry unit.
2. Evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to the 174th Aviation Combat Company during his total tour of duty in Vietnam. He was never assigned to an infantry unit.
3. Evidence of record show the applicant is eligible for the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Air Medal with Numeral 23.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 8 September 1968; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 7 September 1971. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
5. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__fne___ __jpi___ __kah___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003089018 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040205 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0111 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070109C070402
There are no flight hours recorded in the applicant’s service personnel records and his records fail to show that he was awarded any additional awards of the Air Medal. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023993
However, item 24 of the DD Form 214 at the time of the applicant's 1971 separation was required to show all awards the Soldier has received during his military service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and that he participated in seven campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214, dated 28 March 1971, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008428
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. There are no general orders available that show he was awarded the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 September 1968 to 27 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014830C070206
James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to the following units: a. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004751
The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Army Aviation Badge and, in effect, that these and any other awards that he is authorized be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Army Aviation Badge because he was member of the 199th Infantry Brigade, and he served in ground combat operations and he was awarded the Bronze Star...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011186
His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Aircraft Crewmember Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Air Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant completed infantry training and was awarded MOS 11B. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 May 1967 through 19...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008208C070208
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show his MOS (military occupational specialty) as 11B (infantry) vice 63B (wheel vehicle mechanic); that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge; and that he be awarded the Air Medal with “V” device. Thus, his request to correct his DD Form 214 to show his MOS as 11B is not granted. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show his MOS as 11B, and award of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018386
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his date of birth as 3 April; and b. award of the Aircraft Crewman Badge, Air Assault Badge, and Air Medal. The available records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. There is insufficient evidence of record or independent evidence that suggests the date of birth recorded in his military records was a material error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019658
U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for the award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by permanently awarding him the Basic Aviation Badge. The Board also recommends item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 1 December 1971 be amended to show he was awarded or is authorized the: * Basic Aviation Badge * Vietnam Service Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005029
The applicant states, in effect: * his current DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)) does not address all of the Air Medals he was awarded * as proof, he points out the citation for the 3rd through 18th Oak Leaf Cluster for the Air Medal * he "actively participated in more than twenty-five aerial missions over hostile territory in support of counterinsurgency operations" during the period 7 June to 14 December 1967 (awards given in General Orders (GO) Numbers 942 through 944; they are all...