| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Carolyn Wade | Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states that he was the charge-of-quarters (CQ), not corporal of the guard. He states that the unit turned off the light plant at midnight. He further states that since a candle was the only light an intruder mistook him as the enemy and attempted to kill him. The applicant also states that we are fighting an undeclared war and awarding the Purple Heart to Soldiers wounded by their own men. He concludes that he fought in a declared war, was injured, and that he deserves a Purple Heart.
3. The applicant provides a copy of a line of duty statement, dated 18 July 1944, and a letter from the Military Order of the Purple Heart forwarding his case.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. This case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consist of two Hospital Admission Card entries from the Office of The Surgeon General.
2. The applicant is requesting correction of an error or injustice which occurred in January 1946. The application submitted in this case is dated 22 May 2002 and was received in this office on 9 April 2003.
3. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
4. On 13 December 1943, the applicant was a 20-year-old enlisted Soldier serving in North Africa when he was admitted to the 23rd Station Hospital for treatment of encephalitis. He was returned to duty following treatment.
5. On 15 July 1944, the applicant was serving in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater when he was admitted to the 111th Station Hospital for 32 days. He was treated for a compound fracture of the Tibia shaft resulting from a non-battle gunshot wound. It was also noted that the applicant was intentionally shot by another person (not enemy, or guard, sentry, or Military Police). Following treatment the applicant was returned to duty.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant was twice hospitalized for medical treatment, neither time qualifies him for award of the Purple Heart. The first time he was treated for encephalitis. The second time he was treated for a fractured Tibia resulting from a non-battle gunshot wound.
2. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration in January 1944, the date of his separation from active duty. However, the ABCMR was not established until 2 January 1947. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 1 January 1950. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__aao___ __le____ __ym____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
Arthur A. Omartian
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003088949 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040127 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014378C070206
This document shows that the proceedings of a Board of Medical Officers convened on 18 July 1944. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was injured as a result of an accident on 7 July 1944 when he suffered a fracture of his left tibia and fibula. There is no official documentary evidence in the applicant's military service records that supports the contention that he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action or was treated for such wound by a medical officer.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080262C070215
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084074C070212
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was treated for a wound as a result of enemy action and it would be in the interest of justice to correct his records to show entitlement to an award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 4...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006244C070206
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 16 January 1946. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) shows the entry "None."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004986
The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. Based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the FSM met the eligibility criteria for award of the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086446C070212
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In order to support awarding a member the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound or injury for which the award is being made was caused by or resulted from enemy action. By regulation, in order to support the award of the PH, there must be evidence to confirm the wound or injury for which the award is being made was the result of or caused by enemy action.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014233
The applicant states that the FSM should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury he suffered during war service and the subsequent deformity of his leg. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows the FSM was wounded or injured as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004618
The applicant requests the records of his late father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded two Purple Hearts. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Bronze Star Medal based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; b. deleting the Purple Heart listed on his WD AGO Form 53-98; and c. adding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007864
The available medical evidence shows that the applicant received a fracture to his right tibia in October 1967. There is no evidence the applicant received a fractured tibia as a result of enemy action. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086582C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53- 55 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other awards that were omitted. However, it does not show credit for the Combat Infantryman Badge or any other service awards. The evidence of record does not show that the applicant was wounded three times and awarded the Purple Heart for those wounds.