Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088867C070403
Original file (2003088867C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 12 February 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088867


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Robert J. Osborn Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant states that the omission of this award might hinder his possibilities of qualifying for some Veterans Affairs benefits.

3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 8 April 1969. The application submitted in this case is dated 24 March 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant was inducted on 17 October 1966. He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to Company E, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry of the 199th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam from 29 March 1967 until he was injured on
27 December 1967 when he accidentally shot himself in the left leg while on guard duty. He was transferred to the United States on 19 January 1968 for medical treatment. On 8 April 1969, the applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) (40 percent) for residuals of his leg injury. He was found fit for duty and removed from the TDRL on 30 November 1973.

4. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, Good Conduct Medal, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards.

5. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

6. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

7. The applicant's service personnel records show he participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.

8. Department of the Army General Number Orders 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to
28 March 1973.

9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the applicant's unit is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971.

10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

11. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. This regulation also states, in pertinent part, that a silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.

12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. Evidence of record shows the applicant accidentally shot himself in the left leg while on guard duty on 27 December 1967 in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for injuries as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars.

3. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal.

4. The applicant's unit received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation while he was assigned to it.

5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 8 April 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 7 April 1972. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

6. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 3 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JL_____ LE______ RJO_____ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
3. The Board determined that administrative errors in the records of the individual concerned should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.




                  __Joann Langston______
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003088867
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040212
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001555C070205

    Original file (20060001555C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018181

    Original file (20070018181.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders in the applicant's records that show award of the Purple Heart. AR 600-8-22 also provides that there are no time limitations for requests for award of the Purple Heart. Given that the applicant did not receive orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his name is not on the Vietnam Casualty List, and nothing in his official records shows he was wounded, the preponderance of evidence weighs against awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012163

    Original file (20060012163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006023C070206

    Original file (20050006023C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), Veterans Administration (VA) Request for Information, VA Rating Decision, and medical records. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017920

    Original file (20070017920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 September 1966. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal first award for the period 27 September 1966 to 19 September 1968, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013196

    Original file (20060013196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's high frequency hearing loss is documented in his military service records. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015780C071108

    Original file (20060015780C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 5 of the DD Form 215, dated 12 January 2006, shows that he received a Valorous Unit Award and a Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he was wounded by hostile action on 26 April 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011288

    Original file (20060011288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, other evidence of record shows he was wounded due to the accidental discharging of his weapon while he was on guard duty. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and two bronze service stars for wear on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000611

    Original file (20080000611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart while he served in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by: a. awarding the applicant two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and adding these stars to his DD Form 214; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013987

    Original file (20090013987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of these decorations to the applicant. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that the applicant was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, ARCOM with first oak leaf cluster, Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, Air Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one bronze service star, and the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board...