Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088493C070403
Original file (2003088493C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 25 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088493


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor Chairperson
Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) debt be waived.

2. The applicant states that his cadet contract states he can serve 3 years of active duty in lieu of repayment of his ROTC debt. His Marine Corps contract is for 4 years, which more than satisfies the contract requirements.

3. The applicant provides his Army ROTC scholarship contract and his basic (DD Forms 4/1 and 4/2) U. S. Marine Corps enlistment contract.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (ROTC Control Group) on 30 August 1999. His DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract), paragraph 7 states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or was ordered to serve.

2. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for 2 years if the breach occurred during Military Science II; for 3 years if the breach occurred during Military Science III, or for 4 years if the breach occurred during Military Science IV.

3. In an advisory opinion, the U. S. Army Cadet Command noted that the applicant was notified of initiation of disenrollment action from the ROTC program due to his failure to meet the requirements of the Army Weight Control Program and the Army Physical Fitness Test prior to the end of the last school term of the Military Science III year. He waived his right to a hearing. He declined to accept expeditious call to active duty in lieu of monetary repayment. He signed for the disenrollment memorandum and addendum on 18 April 2002 but failed to respond with an elected option (pay in full, pay in installments, or appeal). His case was processed for establishment of an involuntary debt in the amount of $25,303.00 on 15 May 2002. He was disenrolled from the Army ROTC program on 15 May 2002.

4. The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Marine Corps on 24 September 2002 for 4 years in pay grade E-2. It cannot be determined from the available evidence if he enlisted for any type of enlistment bonus.

5. Army Regulation 135-210 prescribes policies and procedures for ordering individual soldiers of the Army National Guard of the United States and the U. S. Army Reserve to active duty during peacetime. In pertinent part, it states that former ROTC cadets, when ordered to active duty, will be ordered to report to the U. S. Army Reception Battalion and will be ordered to active duty in pay grade E-1.

6. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U. S. Army Cadet Command. That Headquarters recommended that the applicant's enlistment not reduce the amount he will be required to reimburse the United States for his advanced educational assistance.

7. A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. Although not provided for in his DA Form 597-3, the applicant’s 24 September 2002 enlistment in the U. S. Marine Corps served the same purpose as would have been served had he been ordered to active duty in the U. S. Army albeit in a different branch of service. The Department of Defense is still getting the benefits of his service (for a period of 4 years whereas his ROTC contract required only 3 years of active duty). As a matter of equity it would be appropriate to consider his enlistment in the U. S. Marine Corps to have met the active duty obligation required by his ROTC scholarship contract.

2. If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis.

3. Had the applicant chosen active duty or been involuntarily ordered to active duty as a result of his disenrollment, he would have been assigned against the needs of the Army, in pay grade E-1, and not allowed any enlistment options. The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Marine Corps in the grade of E-2 and it cannot be determined from the available evidence if he received any enlistment bonus.

4. If the applicant did receive an enlistment bonus, the prospect of negating his $25,303.00 debt for a free education he received from the Army without becoming an officer, plus allowing him to receive any enlistment bonus he ordinarily would not have received, would be a windfall. While the Board has no


jurisdiction to stop any enlistment bonus in this case, any such bonus would be a legitimate factor to consider in granting or denying equitable relief regarding the ROTC debt.

BOARD VOTE:

__rvo___ __lem___ __ym____ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service obligation under the original terms of the ROTC contract as a U. S. Marine Corps enlisted soldier;

2. That the Defense Finance and Accounting Service audit his records to determine if he has been paid or is due to be paid an enlistment bonus. In the event that he has been paid an enlistment bonus or becomes due for payment of an enlistment bonus, that bonus payment should be recouped to offset an equal portion of his ROTC scholarship debt.

3. If he fails to complete the period of enlisted service obligated as a result of his amended ROTC scholarship contract either voluntarily or because of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-rated basis in accordance with his DA Form 597-3.




                  ___Raymond V. O'Connor
                  CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003088493
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031125
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Schneider
ISSUES 1. 128.10
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002371C070206

    Original file (20050002371C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his Army ROTC scholarship contract, recruiter contact information, his ROTC enlistment contract, and a letter from his father. That office noted that the applicant was offered the option [of repaying his ROTC scholarship debt or serving on active duty] on 20 May 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy a portion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010773

    Original file (20080010773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of web orders from the U.S. Marine Corps, dated 7 January 2008; a memorandum, subject: Disenrollment from the U.S. Army ROTC Program, dated 29 July 2005; his U.S. Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record; his Addendum to Part I Scholarship Contractual Agreement; his DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract); his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States); a memorandum, subject: Scholarship...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004506C070205

    Original file (20060004506C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 597-3, paragraph 7 states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or was ordered to serve. That office...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105605C070208

    Original file (2004105605C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 27 October 2003, Headquarters, U. S. Army Cadet Command sent the applicant a statement of options – either repay the ROTC debt monetarily or agree to be ordered to active duty based on the needs of the Army. That office noted the applicant's voluntary enlisted service in the Regular Army is not an authorized remedy for debt repayment under the terms of the ROTC contract and recommended that his voluntary enlistment not reduce the amount he is required to reimburse the United States for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008532

    Original file (20070008532.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests to change the "Acknowledgement of Cadet" portion of his Disenrollment of Scholarship Cadet from the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) program to show "accept expeditious call to active duty" instead of "decline expeditious call to active duty" and, in effect, that his debt for not completing the requirements of his ROTC scholarship be forgiven based on his enlistment and service in the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC). The applicant’s subsequent voluntary enlistment in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062761C070421

    Original file (2001062761C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his ROTC debt should be terminated due to the terms of the contract stating that if he completed 3 years of active duty in the U. S. Army his balance would be $0.00. Paragraph 8 of the applicant’s DA Form 597-3 states that if he were called to active duty for breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 7, he would be ordered to active duty for one of the periods listed, based upon the year during which the breach occurs: Military Science II, 2 years;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072636C070403

    Original file (2002072636C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) on 23 August 1999, under the ROTC scholarship Cadet Program with prior military service. It stated that the applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC Program on 9 November 2002, under the provisions of Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a(1). Public Law 92-453 authorizes the waiver of erroneous payments of pay and allowances to former members or civilian employees.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005887

    Original file (20130005887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An ROTC Cadet Action Request was initiated by his PMS requesting a board of officers consider the applicant's disenrollment for breaching the terms of his ROTC contract based on absences and failure to enroll in Military Science classes in the 2010 Fall semester by failing to attend Advanced Camp and that he be required to repay his monetary scholarship benefits. The applicant's DA Form 5315-E (U.S. Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record), certified on 13 September 2010, shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011871

    Original file (20070011871.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His voluntary enlistment in the USMC is not an authorized remedy for ROTC debt repayment under the terms of his ROTC contract. Further, he enlisted in the USMC some 14 months after his disenrollment from the ROTC program and is now serving on active duty with the USMC for a period of 4 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067945C070402

    Original file (2002067945C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In lieu of repayment, the cadet could be ordered to active duty for not more than four years. Had the applicant not had a service or repayment obligation, based on the ROTC program requirements, he would have been entitled to all of the enlistment incentives he received including the $13,000 cash bonus. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. amending the applicant’s ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the service...