| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Jeanie M. Biggs | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable.
2. The applicant states, in effect that he was a good soldier and did his time, both mentally and physicaly.
3. The applicant does not provide any documentation in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 10 June 1983. The application submitted in this case is dated 28 February 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. On 21 March 1972, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for
3 years. He completed the training requirements and was awarded Military Occupational Specialty 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic). He was assigned to Germany on 25 October 1972. He was awarded the Soldier’s Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal. He advanced to the pay grade of E-4 and was honorably discharged on 25 February 1974.
4. On 26 February 1974, he immediately reenlisted and through a series of reenlistments remained on active duty until 17 August 1978. He was honorably discharged in pay grade E-5.
5. On 18 August 1978, he reenlisted for 6 years.
6. On 13 July 1982, the applicant was convicted contrary to his plea by a General Court Martial of assault and battery upon a child under the age of 16.
His sentence consisted of a BCD, reduction to pay grade E-1 and confinement at hard labor for 13 months. The convening authority approved the sentence.
7. He was then imprisoned. On 4 February 1983, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed only so much of the sentence as provided for a BCD, reduction to pay grade E-1, and confinement at hard labor for 9 months.
8. On 31 May 1983, the court-martial convening authority directed that the applicant’s sentence, as modified, be executed.
9. Upon completion of his sentence (as modified by convening authority), he was given excess leave.
10. On 10 June 1983, he was given a BCD. He had 4 years, 2 months and
14 days of creditable service during that reenlistment. He also had 224 days of time lost.
11. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The applicant’s entire record of service was considered. While the applicant was awarded the Soldier’s Medal in a prior period of service, this decoration is not sufficiently mitigating to upgrade a properly issued BCD.
3. The quality of the applicant’s service during the period in question did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance expected of Army personnel; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to an upgrade of his BCD to an honorable discharge.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.
6. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 10 June 1983; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 9 June 1986. While, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case and consider the case on its merits because the applicant’s request is based on his post service conduct.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___lf ____ ___rvo___ ___mvt__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088344 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | YYYYMMDD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021297
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140021297 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his case was an isolated incident and that there were no alcohol/drug treatment services available at the time of his service. Special Court-Martial Order Number 106, dated 3 August 1983, shows the convening authority approved the sentence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006406
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by the U.S. Army Court of Military Review. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 July 1978, and he cited his DOB as 10...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005745
On 31 August 1978, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Records show the applicant's initial enlistment and period of honorable active duty service from 30 August 1976 through 30 August 1978 is documented by a separate DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072184C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 17 November 1981, his commander notified him that he was considering whether he should impose NJP against the applicant for being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057265C070420
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. He successfully completed his training and was transferred to Germany on 29 August 1976.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098031C070212
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 1 May 1967 the sentence was affirmed and the bad conduct discharge ordered to be executed. The record of trial by general court-martial is not available to the Board; however, absent evidence to the contrary the applicant's conviction for larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny, his sentence to confinement, and his bad conduct discharge are correct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002366C070206
Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 6 June 1995, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and it voted to deny the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087795C070212
On 7 September 1982, he enlisted in the Army at Fort Dix, New Jersey, for 3 years in the pay grade of E-3. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Additionally, he was assigned a separation code and an RE code in accordance with the appropriate regulations and there is no evidence of record to support his contention...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016535C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012041
The applicant states that he has two honorable discharges and that the penalty of a bad conduct discharge was not warranted. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge or an honorable discharge.