| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | ||
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he enlisted in the Army for 3 years and that he completed 3 years, 6 months and 14 days of total active service. He also states that he served his overseas tour of duty and that he had a good time. He states that he would have been discharged in January 1984; however, he got into trouble in December 1983. He concludes by stating that he was so close to finishing his tour of duty, that it was unfair to give him a BCD.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 20 January 1981, he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. He successfully completed his training as a material storage and holding specialist. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 20 July 1981 and to the pay grade of E-3 on 1 November 1981.
Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant on 11 November 1982, for wrongfully having in his possession one or more grams of marijuana in the hashish form and for wrongfully having in his possession a prohibited item, a smoking device. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2 and a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $321.00 per month for 2 months.
On 27 April 1983, NJP was imposed against him for willfully disobeying a lawful order given by his senior noncommissioned officer to report to him on 20 April, 21 April and 22 April 1983. His punishment consisted a reduction to the pay grade of E-1 (suspended until 27 July 1983) and extra duty for 14 days.
On 6 December 1983, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of nine specifications of wrongfully and unlawfully uttering to the Army Air Force Exchange Services checks for the purpose of procuring things of value and thereafter, dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 45 days, a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $382.00 per month for 2 months and a BCD.
The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged and on 12 July 1984, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority.
Accordingly, on 13 September 1984, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed special court-martial conviction. He had completed 3 years, 6 months and 14 days of total active service and he was furnished a BCD.
There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11 provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence duly executed.
Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to modify the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the facts of the case.
3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the relief requested when compared to the seriousness of his offenses. He had NJP imposed for possession of marijuana and for disobeying orders. He was convicted by a special court-martial of nine specifications of failing to maintain sufficient funds to cover his checks. Considering his numerous acts of indiscipline it does not appear that his BCD was unfair.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___jlp ___ __ao____ ___pm __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088282 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/23 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1984/09/13 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 675 | 144.6800/BCD |
| 2. 678 | 144.6803/SERIOUS OFFENSE |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017434
On 29 March 1985, the United States Army Court of Military Review considered the record of trial in the applicant's case. At issue before the Court was whether the military judge erred by considering, during sentencing, portions of a record of trial from a prior general court-martial of the applicant. The applicant contends that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge under honorable conditions because he was introduced to drugs and alcohol by Soldiers...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004642
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to private first class on 1 April 1981 and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002991C070205
On 28 February 1981, while stationed in Germany, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army in the grade of E-5 for a period 4 years after having served on active duty previously. On 28 January 1986, the applicant was discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002006
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002006 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to honorable. Headquarters, U.S. Army Infantry Center and Fort Benning, Special Court-Martial Order Number 111, dated 17 October 1983, shows the applicant's approved sentence to reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 3 months, and discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011983
The applicant requests, in effect, clemency and an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD). His service record shows he received an Article 15 for possessing some amount of marijuana and a conviction by a general court-martial for violating a general regulation, unlawfully striking a PFC, and assaulting a SP4. As a result, his record of service was not satisfactory and did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel for an honorable or a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009795
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 4 June 1984, the sentence was approved and the record of trial was forwarded to The Judge Advocate General of the Army for review by a Court of Military Review. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 24 January 1985 under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005294
He states he was locked up for four months and given a BCD because they thought he had lied. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge under honorable conditions. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021912
His military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 4 March 1980 for 3 years. He was sentenced to a reduction to pay grade E-1, confinement at hard labor for 2 months, and to be discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge. He provided no evidence to show that his discharge was unjust at the time of his offenses.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072184C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 17 November 1981, his commander notified him that he was considering whether he should impose NJP against the applicant for being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003317
His records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. This form further shows the applicant completed 2 years, 11 months, and 3 days of creditable military service. There is no indication in the applicants records that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that Boards 15 year statute of limitations.