Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088237C070403
Original file (2003088237C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 18 November 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003088237

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Richard P. Nelson Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCM) and the Sharpshooter Badge for the M-1 Carbine.

APPLICANT STATES: That he was awarded the GCM and that it does not appear on his DD Form 214. He further states that he “also had the Sharpshooter award for the M-1 and that does not appear on the DD Form 214 either.” The applicant comments that “I wish to be able to wear the medals I have earned and my DD Form 214 does not reflect the GCM I was awarded.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 19 June 1962 for a period of 3 years. He was trained in Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 131.10 (Armor Crewman) and assigned to Germany. On 14 March 1963, the applicant was awarded MOS 111.10 (Light Weapons Infantryman). He returned to the United States and was separated from the Army on 8 June 1965 in pay grade E-3.

Item 24 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows award of the Sharpshooter Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

Item 28 (Qualification in Arms) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he qualified for the Marksman Badge in the M-1 Carbine Rifle on 1 August 1962 and Tank Gun (90 millimeter) on 29 October 1962. He qualified for the Sharpshooter Badge in Tank Sub Machine Gun on 24 October 1962 and M-14 Rifle on 10 July 1964.

On 15 June 1963 nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for absenting himself, without authority, from his unit from 2300 hours, 30 May 1963 until 2330 hours, 30 May 1963. His punishment consisted of reduction in grade from PFC E-3 to PVT E-2 and 14 days extra duty.

On 6 February 1964 nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for violating a lawful order, visiting an off limits establishment during field training. His punishment consisted of reduction from pay grade E-3 to E-2, 14 days extra duty, 14 days restriction, and forfeiture of ten dollars.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the GCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the GCM, disqualification must be justified. Throughout the qualifying period, the record of each individual soldier must indicate that the soldier has: willingly complied with the demands of the military environment; been loyal and obedient to their superiors; faithfully supported the goals of their organization and the Army; and conducted themselves in such an exemplary manner as to distinguish them from their fellow soldiers. While any record of nonjudicial punishment could be in conflict with recognizing the soldier’s service as exemplary, such record should not be viewed as automatically disqualifying.

The applicant’s service personnel records, to include his medical records, are intact and complete. There are no orders awarding the applicant the GCM and the applicant has not provided any orders, or a certificate, awarding him the GCM.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that marksmanship badges are awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual has qualified in prescribed weapons firing courses or events. The badges, listed from the highest to lowest degree of marksmanship, are the Expert Badge, the Sharpshooter Badge and the Marksman Badge. The regulation also provides that an appropriate component bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual soldier qualified. The only weapons for which component bars are authorized are listed in table 8-2 of the regulation. Only the highest degree of marksmanship is listed on an individual's separation document.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s entire record of service. There is no record or documentary evidence of acts of valor, achievement, or service that would warrant special recognition.

2. The Board noted that nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant on two separate occasions. While any record of nonjudicial punishment should not be viewed as automatically disqualifying the applicant for award of the GCM, it would appear that the applicant’s commander intentionally disqualified the applicant for the GCM. There is currently insufficient evidence to support any other conclusion.

3. The Board noted the applicant’s entitlement to award of the Tank Weapons component bar for the Sharpshooter Badge and determined that his records should be corrected administratively.

4. The Board noted that the applicant qualified for the Marksman Badge with Carbine component bar. However, the Board further noted that this badge is not authorized for entry on the applicant’s DD Form 214, since the applicant’s highest marksmanship badge is the Sharpshooter Badge.

5. The Board noted the applicant’s entitlement to the National Defense Service Medal and determined that his records should be corrected administratively.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

NOTE: The Board requests that the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), Support Division, St. Louis, administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that he was awarded the Tank Weapons component bar and the National Defense Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___mdm _ ___jns___ ___bje __ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003088237
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20031118
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018119

    Original file (20100018119.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to approve award of the Army Good Conduct Medal to the applicant and correct his records. The evidence of record shows the applicant qualified for award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity from 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013652

    Original file (20120013652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, Korea Defense Service Medal, and his Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine and Rifle Bars. The applicant states these awards and badge are not recorded on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020247

    Original file (20130020247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he completed mechanic training and that he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Driver and Mechanic Badge, and Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine and (M-1 and M-14) Rifle Bars. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant completed mechanic training. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018363

    Original file (20130018363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine, Rifle (M-1, M-14, and M-15), Grenade Launcher, Rocket Launcher, and Pistol Bars; and b. award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for his service in Berlin. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1). _______ _ _x______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018600

    Original file (20100018600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 18 October 1965 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in items: * 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 3b (Date of Rank) he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 * 10a (Highest Civilian Education Level Attained) he completed general equivalency development (GED) courses at Fort Eustis, VA * 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) his last duty assignment was the 1099th Transportation Company * 13b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009202

    Original file (20110009202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar (M-1), to correct his weight shown on this form, and to show he attended the Intercept Equipment Repairman course at Fort Meade, MD, from November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008104

    Original file (20140008104.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) as follows: a. show he completed his high school GED; b. show he was advanced to the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7; c. show awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Service Medal, Overseas Service [Ribbon], Army Service [Ribbon], American Defense Service Medal, and Army Reserve Components Achievement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000344

    Original file (20120000344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101893C070208

    Original file (2004101893C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Two DA Forms 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) on file, dated 30 August 1991 and 6 May 2002, confirm the responsible Department of the Army agency authorized the issue of the following awards to the applicant based on a review of his record: Expert Qualification Badge with Machine Gun and Carbine Bars; Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and NDSM. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019304

    Original file (20130019304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served on active duty in Korea from 27 December 1962 to 15 July 1965, a period of over 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...