| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Lester Echols | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that clemency be granted in the form of a discharge upgrade.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he injured his back during his military service and has suffered severe problems due to this injury. He contends that he needs medical treatment from the Department of the Veterans Affairs (DVA) because he does not have any insurance.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted on 5 February 1971 for a period of 2 years. He successfully completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was transferred to Germany for duty as a heavy truck driver.
On 15 February 1972, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for disrespectful behavior. His punishment consisted of a reduction to pay grade E-2 (suspended for 1 month) and a forfeiture of pay.
On 16 June 1972, contrary to his pleas, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of committing aggravated assault upon a civilian by cutting him in the abdomen with a knife. He was sentenced to be discharged from the service with a dishonorable discharge, to be reduced to pay grade E-1, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for 2 years. On 25 August 1972, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a reduction to pay grade E-1, a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 2 years and total forfeitures.
On 25 June 1973, the United States Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings of guilty and sentence. The bad conduct discharge was ordered executed on 9 August 1973.
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 5 September 1973 pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial. He was issued a Bad Conduct Discharge Certificate. He had served 1 year, 2 months and 9 days of total active service with 296 days lost due to confinement and 213 days lost subsequent to his normal expiration term of service.
The applicant was paroled on 12 September 1973 from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks (USDB) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He was released and set at liberty on 15 June 1974.
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant injured his back during his military service. However, his service medical records do
show that he was treated for low back pain on several occasions. The medical evidence shows the applicant’s back x-ray was within normal limits and that he had full range of motion. While in confinement at the USDB, the applicant underwent a routine physical examination on 16 October 1972 and his physical profile was 111111.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-11 of this regulation states that a soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
Section 1552(f), Title 10, United States Code states that the ABCMR can only review records of court-martial and related administrative records to correct a record to accurately reflect action taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) or to take clemency action.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently
meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he injured his back during his military service. However, service medical records do not indicate any medical condition incurred while entitled to receive basic pay which was so severe as to render the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty.
3. The Board noted the applicant’s contention that he needs his discharge upgraded to allow him entitlement to DVA benefits for medical care. However, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of obtaining medical benefits.
4. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included one nonjudicial punishment and one general court-martial conviction and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance for Army personnel. Therefore, the Board determined that clemency in the form of an honorable discharge was not warranted in this case.
5. The Board also determined that the seriousness of the aggravated assault offense was too serious to grant clemency in the form of a general discharge.
6. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that the actions taken in his case were in error or unjust.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
KAN____ LE_____ JTM_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088186 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031002 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19730905 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 Paragraph 11-2 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076235C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The military judge, considering the applicant’s service history prior to his AWOL and his 10 months service in South Vietnam, recommended that the BCD be suspended during the applicant’s period of confinement. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016103
The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD) to a general discharge (GD). The applicant states: * 11 December 1994 he completed his 22-year sentence * his DD should be upgrade to a GD * prior to 18 May 1970 his active duty record was excellent * he was advanced four pay grades in 9 months 3. The applicant provides: * an undated letter written to the Veterans Administration * a statement addressed "To Whom It May Concern" dated 12 November 2005 * DD Form 214 (Armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006545
The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. Yes, he went AWOL; however, he was 18 years old when he returned from Vietnam. Notwithstanding his contention that he went AWOL due to mental stress from his service in Vietnam, the evidence of record shows he testified that he went AWOL as a way to escape drugs, did not seek help for his drug problem while on active duty, and continued to use drugs while he was AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005298
On 14 May 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) reviewed the applicant's military records and all other available evidence and denied the applicant's request for a change in the character and reason of discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Ann M. Campbell ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090259C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. General Court-Martial Order Number 3, Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, dated 2 June 1968, shows that on 27 March 1968 the applicant was arraigned and tried for premeditated murder for shooting a South Vietnamese soldier on or about 9 March 1968. Two American Soldiers testified that on 9 March 1968 they were drinking some cokes in a store in Phu Long, Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006143
On 18 September 1968, the Army Board of Review found the findings of guilty and sentence correct in law and fact and determined the findings of guilty and only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad conduct discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement at hard labor for 1 year should be approved. The applicant's record of service includes one NJP, two special court-martial convictions, one general court-martial conviction, and 252 days of time lost. Therefore, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000738
USDB Order 021-06, dated 5 March 1997, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army for bad conduct effective 14 March 1997. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his bad conduct discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. The records show he was given a bad conduct discharge pursuant to an approved sentence of a general court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062382C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 April 2001, the applicant submitted an Inmate Request Slip (USDB Form 510) requesting back pay and allowances from 6 May through 14 November 1997, the date the convening authority approved his sentence. The record also clearly establishes that of the 17 offenses for which the applicant was adjudged guilty, 16 were committed after 1 April 1996, and only 1 was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002536C070208
The applicant’s disciplinary history includes his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice UCMJ) on two separate occasions. On 13 June 1972, the applicant was separated with a BCD. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018578
There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Therefore, given the available evidence in this case, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant an...