| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | ||
| Mr. Lawrence Foster | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request that his 1945 special court-martial (SPCM) conviction by set-aside.
3. The applicant states through counsel from the American Legion, in effect, that he is being railroaded and that the Army should clear its conscience in regard to this matter. In his original application, the applicant stated that in March 1945, his unit was located in the Rhineland Palatinate of Germany. On 20 March 1945, his company commander summoned him and instructed him to find a civilian woman who could launder his (company commander’s) uniforms.
4. The applicant also stated that he was aware of the Division policy prohibiting soldiers from fraternizing with German civilians, but he had been ordered by his company commander and did not feel that having uniforms laundered constituted fraternization. He claimed that he found a house near his company headquarters and paid a German lady to wash uniforms. Seen leaving the German home by a Division officer, he was later informed that he would be court-martialed for fraternization. His company commander supported him at the court-martial, but he was convicted nevertheless. He was sentenced to 3 months of extra duty (kitchen police) and a fine of $120.00. He added that he lived with the conviction for 55 years until he received a Presidential Pardon on 22 December 2000. He stated that he now wanted the Board to completely set-aside his unjust conviction. In support of this request, he provided a brief from legal counsel that was considered by the Board during its original deliberations on this case.
5. The Memorandum of Consideration (MOC) of the Board’s 12 September 2002 review of the case (AR2002067317) is incorporated herein by reference as if wholly set forth.
6. The applicant’s military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. In addition, the Board attempted, but was unable to obtain a copy of the applicant’s Record of Trial (ROT) of his SPCM.
7. In March 1945, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for two specifications of wrongfully fraternizing with a German civilian by visiting her home in violation of a 23 November 1944 memorandum prohibiting fraternization with enemy civilians issued by the Commanding General, 84th Infantry Division.
8. According to the applicant, his company commander testified on his behalf at the special court-martial. However, in spite of this testimony and the applicant’s not guilty plea, on 31 March 1945, he was found guilty of both specifications.
9. On 28 March 1946, the applicant was honorably separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-365, by reason of demobilization. He was credited with 2 years, 5 months, and 18 days of active military service.
10. On 22 December 2000, the applicant received a full and unconditional
Presidential pardon for his special court-martial conviction while serving in the United States Army.
11. On 12 September 2002, in response to the applicant’s request that his
court-martial conviction be set-aside, this Board determined that the applicant had failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice, and it denied the requested relief.
12. Army Regulation 15-185 prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The ABCMR is not an investigative body and must decide cases based on the evidence of record. Paragraph 2-9 specifies that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board notes the reassertion of the applicant and his counsel that his SPCM conviction was unjust and should be set-aside. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. The Board did not have before it the applicant’s military records or the ROT of his SPCM. In the absence of the these relevant records or of any independent evidence that shows the applicant’s SPCM conviction was in error or unjust, the Board finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief. The Board concludes that the regulatory burden of proof has not been satisfied and that insufficient evidence exists to overcome the presumption of government regularity in this case.
3. Notwithstanding there being insufficient evidence to set-aside the applicant’s SPCM conviction, the Board does find it would serve the interest of equity and justice to place a copy of the Executive Grant of Clemency (Presidential Pardon) granted the applicant on 22 December 2000 in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) being maintained at the National Personnel Records Center.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by filing a copy of the Executive Grant of Clemency, granted the individual concerned by the President of the United States on 22 December 2000, in his OMPF.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___TK__ ___LF___ __MP____ DENY APPLICATION
Margaret K. Patterson
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003088149 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/05/13 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1946/03/28 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-365 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Demobilization |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT PARTIAL |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 30 | 105.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067317C070402
He states that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) can set aside the applicant's conviction because he was convicted under the Articles of War. The sentence was adjudged on 31 March 1945. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2001-00377A
On 13 Sep 99, the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF) Personnel Board recommended the applicant be dismissed from the service, but if he was allowed to retire, it be in the grade of major. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s dismissal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board majority, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H, and the Minority Report at Exhibit G. On 11 Oct 05, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, asking...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004576C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that clemency be granted in the form of an honorable discharge or a pardon. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to grant service member’s pardons for convictions by a general or special court-martial. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records has no authority to grant the applicant’s request for a pardon.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089833C070403
He departed the ETO on 23 August and arrived in the United States on 2 September 1945. AR 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Army of Occupation Medal is awarded for service of 30 consecutive days at a normal post of duty in a qualifying location. That all Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp and the Meritorious Unit Commendation and adding these awards to Block 33 of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060007705 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060062C070421
The applicant requests that his Report of Separation, WD AGO Form 53-55, item 40 be corrected to show his separation year as 1945 and that the American Campaign Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with three bronze service stars, and the World War II Victory Medal be added to item 33. The available evidence of record shows that the applicant did not meet the eligibility criteria for award of the American Campaign Medal. That the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55, item 32 be amended to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068079C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. In addition, absent the military medical treatment records, the VA record confirmation referred to by the applicant would still not satisfy the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support awarding the PH.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003652C070206
Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In pertinent part, it states an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. It is also noted a letter dated 29 June 1953, which he provided to the Board, indicated there was evidence the applicant "knew what was going on, and some evidence that he was accepting a rake-off on the proceeds."
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100462C070208
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that prior to his discharge, he was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant and that he be awarded all back pay and allowances due him. Counsel requests that the applicant be awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal and that he be given consideration for promotion to staff sergeant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057588C070420
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was hospitalized in New Zealand for malaria, he was a member of the Infantry Cadre at Camp Croft, South Carolina in 1944/1945, his primary combat unit during World War II was the 1 st Battalion, 35 th Infantry Regiment, 25 th Infantry Division, which entitles him to the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The award listing contained in this source publication for the 35 th Infantry Regiment, the applicant’s unit in...