| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Stanley Kelley | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was young and not very smart when he joined the Army. He goes on to state that he broke a limb during basic training and is now encountering problems with it. He goes on to state that he is not making any excuses for his absence without leave (AWOL) but he would like to have his discharge upgraded.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted with parental consent in Cleveland, Ohio, on 14 November 1973, for a period of 3 years, training as a cook and assignment to Fort Ord, California. He successfully completed his basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana, and received orders transferring him to Fort Ord with a report date of 1 March 1974. He failed to report as ordered and was reported as AWOL.
He remained absent until he returned to military control at Fort Ord on 1 April 1974. He again went AWOL on 3 April 1974 and remained absent until he surrendered to military authorities on 25 May 1974, and charges were preferred against him.
He again went AWOL on 3 July 1974 and on 3 October 1974, the applicant's wife informed Federal Bureau of Investigation officials during an interview, that the applicant was in prison. On 20 May 1975, the Army took custody of the applicant on the date he was tried and convicted of armed robbery and sentenced under the California Youth Offenders Act.
On 10 July 1975, the applicant acknowledged that he had been advised that he was being recommended for separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, due to his conviction by civil authorities. He indicated that he did not intend to appeal his conviction and after consulting with counsel, he elected to exercise all of his rights. He also submitted a statement in his own behalf whereas he asserted that going AWOL was a childish thing to do and he realized it at that time. He stated that he desired to appear before a board of officers and that it was his intent to stay in the Army for a career if given a chance to do so.
The applicant appeared before a board of officers on 16 December 1975, represented by counsel and accompanied by family members, various prison officials and counselors, who all testified in his behalf. The board of officers, after hearing testimony and reviewing the evidence of record, voted to discharge him for misconduct and recommended that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The convening authority approved the findings and recommendation of the board.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 28 January 1976, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, based on his conviction by civil authorities. He had served 4 months and 23 days of total active service and 657 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement by civil authorities.
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 11 March 1976, contending that his discharge was too harsh and that he should be afforded the opportunity to return to the service. The ADRB determined that his discharge was proper and denied his appeal on 3 March 1977.
He again applied to the ADRB on 19 January 1978 for an upgrade of his discharge and requested an appearance before the ADRB Travel Panel in San Francisco. He was granted a personal appearance but failed to respond to the notification letter, which informed him of the hearing date and location. Accordingly, the ADRB reviewed his records and determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances. The ADRB voted unanimously to deny his appeal on 5 September 1979.
Army Regulation 635-206, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 33 of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that members convicted by civil authorities would be processed for separation. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, currently in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, desertion or AWOL. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is still normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no violations or procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
3. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the available facts of the case.
4. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board. However, given the seriousness of his offenses and his otherwise undistinguished record of service, they are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__clp____ ___sk___ ___jm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088119 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/09/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1976/01/28 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-206 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | CIVIL CONV |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 627 | 144.6100/A61.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050014849C070206
He also states that he told his commander that all he wanted was to get treatment and carry on with his duties but his commander did not want to hear that. He applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) on 21 July 1977 for an upgrade of his discharge and contended at that time that it was unjust for the Army to discharge him for a civilian offense, because he was serving time for that offense at that time. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088302C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 24 February 1976, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, due to his conviction by civil authorities. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000667C070205
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025369
The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 7 October 1975 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 due to conviction by civil authorities with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant's overall record of service has been considered.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080332C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 26 January 1976, the applicant's commander advised the applicant of his rights and preferred charges against him for the AWOL offense. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010716
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. He was convicted by civil authorities on 22 April 1975 and sentenced to incarceration in the State Penitentiary for 3 years. On 14 July 1975 the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations Discharge Misconduct) due to his conviction by civil authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084226C070212
On 12 April 1976, the applicant's commander submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, due to conviction by civil authorities. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206, for misconduct – conviction by civil authorities. There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086974C070212
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He states that the military again came for him. The applicant’s contention that he was young, and did not fully understand the basis for his separation, is not supported by any evidence submitted by him, or contained in records available to the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002283
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or a GD if it were warranted based on the member's record of service. His record also includes letters from the applicant requesting discharge as a result of his civil conviction and a Congressional Inquiry Packet that confirms he sought the assistance of a Member of Congress in expediting his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009110C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 August 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040009110 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that, on 2 October 1974, he was discharged with...