| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor . | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Frank C. Jones | Member | ||
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his narrative reason for his discharge be changed to medical.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was not aware that he could request a change to the narrative reason for his discharge. He further claims that his understanding was that he was receiving a medical discharge due to his hearing loss. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 11 October 1977, the applicant entered the Army for a period of 3 years. His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and the highest rank he attained during his active duty tenure was private/E-1 (PV1).
The applicant’s record shows that he was assigned to Fort Dix, New Jersey for basic combat training. It also shows that while he was in basic training, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 17 November 1977, for failure to go to his appointed place of duty. In addition, he was formally counseled by his chain of command for his lack of motivation and self-discipline, poor duty performance, negative attitude, and constant complaining.
On 17 November 1977, the applicant was notified by his commander that separation action was being initiated to eliminate him from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39, the Trainee Discharge Program. The reason cited by the commander for the action was the applicant’s extreme deficiencies in aptitude and motivation, his inability to meet minimum training standards, and his consistent failure to make an effort to improve within a reasonable amount of time. The applicant acknowledged the separation action and completed his election of rights. He waived his right to consulting counsel and to take a separation medical examination, and he elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any medical treatment records, and contains no indication that the applicant suffered from any physically or mentally disabling medical condition at the time of his discharge.
The separation action was approved by the appropriate authority and on
6 December 1977, the applicant was discharged from the Army with an honorable discharge under the provisions of the Trainee Discharge Program. At the time of his discharge, he had completed 1 month and 26 days of total active military service.
Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 3-3b(1), as amended, provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he must be unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, or rating and the conditions must have been incurred while entitled to base pay.
Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 2-2b, then in effect, provided that when a member was being separated by reason other than physical disability, his continued performance of duty created a presumption of fitness which could be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he was unable to perform his duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-39 contained the policy for separation under the provisions of the Trainee Discharge Program. It stated, in pertinent part, that commanders may expeditiously discharge soldiers who lack the necessary motivation, discipline, ability, or aptitude to become a productive soldier. These soldiers must have voluntarily enlisted in the Regular Army, Army National Guard, or United States Army Reserve, and still in either basic combat training or advanced individual training, and could not have completed no more than 179 days active duty or initial active duty for training on their current enlistment by the date of discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his military records should be corrected to show he received a medical discharge. However, the applicant’s medical records were not available to the Board, and the applicant’s MPRJ contained no medical treatment records or other documents that gave any indication that the applicant suffered from a physically or mentally disabling condition at the time of his discharge. Therefore, the Board finds insufficient evidence to support granting the requested relief.
2. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39, the Trainee Discharge Program. It also shows that in connection with his separation processing he elected not to undergo a separation physical examination. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
3. In view of the facts of this case, the Board finds that the narrative reason for the applicant’s separation was appropriately assigned based on the authority for his discharge. It further finds that the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and that the applicant has failed to provide evidence that would challenge its validity. Therefore, the Board concludes that there is no basis for changing the reason for the applicant’s discharge at this time.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FCJ___ __BJE__ ___RO__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003088074 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19771206 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200. . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Training Discharge Program |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 191 | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004335C070206
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Although the applicant contends that he should have been given a medical discharge, evidence of record shows he underwent an enlistment physical examination on 20 June 1977 and was found qualified for enlistment with a physical profile of 111111 by competent medical authorities. Evidence of record shows the applicant declined a separation physical examination two months later...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004957C070205
Evidence of record shows the applicant declined a separation physical examination three months later on 7 June 1977. There is also no evidence of record to show he was ever medically unfit to perform his duties. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 16 June 1977; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 15 June 1980.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017270
The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 2496, dated 9 December 1976, in which the immediate commander requested and was granted a waiver of the applicants physical test portion of his basic combat training due to a temporary physical profile that was awarded on 24 November 1976 for a period of 21 days for a dislocated knee cap and that the applicant was cleared to ship. On 10 February 1977, the applicants unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004802
The applicant states, in effect, his DD Form 214 shows an incorrect narrative reason for separation and he desires to have it reflect that he was discharged by reason of physical disability. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 10 November 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39 and the TDP. He was issued a separation code of JFM which indicates his separation under paragraph 5-39 and the TDP.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013606
The reasons given by the commander were that the applicant: * could not or would not adapt socially or emotionally to military life * could not meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training because of a lack of motivation * had demonstrated character and behavioral characteristics not satisfactory with continued service 5. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes), then in effect, prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001179C070205
On 30 November 1976, the commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39, Trainee Discharge Program. On 8 December 1976, the applicant completed a separation physical examination. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated under the Trainee Discharge Program for an inability to learn and a lack of motivation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009971
The applicant requests, in effect, that his honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge due to damages while in training. On 9 March 1976, the commander initiated separation action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39, Trainee Discharge Program. The regulation essentially required that the service member have been voluntarily enlisted, be in basic, advanced individual, on-the-job or service school training prior to award of a military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015912
He should have been sent to a medical board and a granted a medical discharge. The objectives of standards was to ensure all Soldiers were physically qualified to perform their duties in a reasonable manner, medical retention qualification standards had been established in Army Regulation 40501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3. His military records also contain no evidence which would entitle him to a medical discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008906C070205
The company commander counseled the applicant on 3 July 1977 on his poor record of conduct and performance. The applicant was counseled again on 24 July 1977 by the unit counselor. On 4 August 1977, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635- 200, paragraph 5-39 for marginal or non-productive performance (Trainee Discharge Program) with an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008467
The applicant requests, in effect, change of the reason for separation to physical disability due to depression. On 2 March 1977 the applicant was notified of initiated separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5 (Trainee Discharge Program (TDP)) because he could not adjust socially or emotionally to military life and he could not meet military standards for aptitude and ability. The regulation essentially...