| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: That he is a combat wounded veteran who received the Purple Heart. He contends that he fought for his country and in his opinion he served honorably. He also states that he needs his discharge upgraded for entitlement to medical benefits at the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). In support of his application, he submits three character reference letters; a Certification of Military Service; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States); and service medical records.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records have been lost or destroyed. This case is being considered using reconstructed records. The applicant's reconstructed records consist primarily of the DD Form 214, discharge orders and service medical records.
The applicant's reconstructed records show he enlisted on 1 May 1950 for a period of 3 years and served as a rifleman in Korea.
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not contained in the available records. However, discharge orders and the applicant's DD Form 214 show he was discharged on 24 December 1952 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366, Section IV, paragraph 15a. His DD Form 214 also shows that he was given an undesirable discharge and that he had 159 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 615-366 in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for misconduct due to fraudulent entry, absent without leave, desertion, and conviction by civil court. Section IV (Conviction by Civil Court), paragraph 15a provided that discharge authorities will discharge individuals who, during their term of service, were convicted by a civil court for a criminal offense or adjudged a youthful offender and sentenced to death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. The regulation also provided that an individual discharged due to conviction by civil court or having been adjudged a youthful offender will be furnished an undesirable discharge certificate.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that
any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he needs his undesirable discharge upgraded to honorable for entitlement to DVA medical benefits. However, the Board does not grant relief for the purpose of obtaining medical benefits.
3. The Board considered the character reference letters provided in support of the applicant's claim. However, good post service conduct alone is not a basis for upgrading his discharge.
4. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s separation was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation appear to be appropriate.
5. The Board noted that the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he had
159 days of lost time and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to an honorable discharge.
6. The applicant failed to convince the Board through the evidence submitted that his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded.
7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
RJW____ LDS____ MJT_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087915 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031028 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19521224 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 615-366 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007377C070206
Jeanette McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 10 September 1953 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615- 366.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011567
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge or an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016129
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was separated with an undesirable discharge on 15 May 1953 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366 (Enlisted Men Discharge Misconduct) for conviction by civil court. However, without having his service personnel records to consider or evidence to the contrary, it is presumed these items on his DD Form 214 are correct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017976
However, his DD Form 214 shows that on 23 September 1955 he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366, for conviction by civil court. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086036C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The only record available that is germane to this case is the above-cited order discharging the applicant on 11 August 1954 with an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any to indicate that his undesirable discharge was in error or that there was an injustice done to him.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002371C070208
The separation document further shows that at the time of his discharge, he had completed a total of 1 year, 5 months and 1 day of active military service and had accrued 116 days of time lost. There is no indication that the applicant requested an upgrade of his discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations. ____John E. Denning ____ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20040002371 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON | | |DATE BOARDED |2005/03/17 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022565
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. He was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 8 August 1949 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366 (Enlisted Personnel Discharge). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009148
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He states that he enlisted on 11 November 1950 and was separated with an undesirable discharge for a civil conviction. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090090C070212
The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no indication in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant has offered no argument or evidence to support his request for an upgrade of his discharge or a change to his mailing address at the time of discharge and the available evidence is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9207189
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. An investigation into his absence was launched and by July 1951 the commander, Fort Custer concluded there was “no documentary evidence available concerning the initial date of absence” and as such recommended the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-366 (desertion), noting “trial barred by Article 43” UCMJ. The Board notes that separation...