| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Gale J. Thomas | Analyst |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Member | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her records be corrected by upgrading her discharge, and by changing her RE-code to allow her reenlistment.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that her problems in the military stemmed from marital and financial problems, and her immaturity and lack of understanding concerning a project she worked on at Fort Detrick, that involved two breeds of monkeys that eventually died, which caused her to be sent to the hospital on two occasions because she was unable to cope with their deaths. She also states that when she was called to Fort Bragg for her discharge she was relieved, but had no idea that it would be under other than honorable conditions. Now that she is old enough and knowledgeable enough to be longsuffering and patient, she wants to be able to reenlist to help her country. The applicant submits no evidence in support of her request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
She enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 May 1978, for a period of 3 years. She completed basic combat training at Fort McClellan, Alabama, and advanced individual training at Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
On 27 September 1983, her commander preferred court-martial charges against her for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 13 March 1979 to 26 September 1983.
On 28 September 1983, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. She was advised of her rights, and indicated she understood the possible ramifications of receiving an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
On 29 November 1983, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s request and directed her reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and the issuance of an under other than honorable condition discharge.
On 9 December 1983, the applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, under the provisions of the above cited regulation. Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) indicates she had 1 year and 11 days of active service, over 800 days of lost time, and was assigned RE-Codes 3, 3B and 3C, and the Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code ”KFS”.
Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 provided, in pertinent part, that a member who had committed and offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. At the time of the applicant’s separation, the regulation provided for the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC).
Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.
RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of Chapters 9, 10, 13, and 14 of Army Regulation 635-200.
RE-3B indicates that a person had lost time during their last enlistment.
RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade requirements of chapter 2, Army Regulation 601-280, or who have been denied reenlistment under the Qualitative Retention Process according to chapter 10, Army Regulation 601-280.
Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that “KFS” is the appropriate SPD code for individuals separated in lieu of trial by court-martial.
A “cross-reference” table, provided by officials from the separations branch at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-Alexandria, confirms that “RE-3” is the appropriate RE code for individuals who have lost time due to AWOL or confinement.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. There is no basis for correcting or removing the RE codes from the applicant's record. In view of the circumstances in this case, the assigned reentry eligibility codes were and still are appropriate. The disqualification upon which the codes were based, however, could be waived for reenlistment purposes.
3. The Board notes, however, that she may be eligible to apply for a waiver for enlistment, and that she should visit her nearest military recruiting office for further eligibility information.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JHL __ __MKP __ __AAO __ DENY APPLICATION
INDEX
| CASE ID | AR2003087899 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031023 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002661
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with a UOTHC discharge on 12 December 1983. It stated that SPD code JFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Service members who received nonjudicial punishment were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017258
However, the applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions on 10 October 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of court-martial. The regulation in effect at the time stated the reason for discharge based on separation code KFS is For the good of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007132
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reentry (RE) Code of "3, 3B, and 3C" be change to a more favorable code and that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded. RE-3C applies to Soldiers who have completed over 4 months of service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade requirements of AR 601-280, chapter 2, or who have been denied reenlistment and who are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted. The evidence shows the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018646
On 31 October 1989, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service, directed that an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate be issued, and directed the applicant be reduced to pay grade E-1. The applicant was discharged on 19 December 1989 in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial. The regulation shows that the SPD of "KFS" as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028487
On 4 November 1981, he was released from active duty after the completion of his required active service with a general discharge under honorable conditions. It notes that an SPD code of "LBK" is the appropriate code when enlisted Soldiers are being involuntarily discharged upon completion of their required active service because they are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment at the time of separation. His SPD code LBK indicates he was involuntarily released from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015329
On 20 November 1982, the separation authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed he receive an Under Other than Honorable Discharge Certificate and be reduced to the grade of E-1. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 1 December 1982 in the rank/grade of private/E-1 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015963C070206
On 24 January 1983 the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial with an UOTHC. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. __ John T....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060884C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: There is no evidence to support his contentions that he suffered from psychiatric problems, depression, and suicidal ideation; that he was denied medical attention; that he was discriminated against; that his chain of command did not help him; or that his legal counsel advised him to go AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005915C070205
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He states he submitted a request to the chaplain for an honorable discharge and his request was granted. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged from active duty with a separation code of "KFS" (For the Good of the Service – In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial) and was assigned RE codes of RE-3, RE- 3B, and RE-3C in accordance with the governing regulation in effect at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004051C070206
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 19 October 1984, under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service, in the pay grade of E-1, with the reenlistment code of RE-3, 3B, 3C, and issued a Discharge Certificate Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The period of service under consideration includes...