| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Shirley Powell | Member | |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant stated that he was involved in a mortar and rocket attack that was attempting to destroy their ammunition dump in Hue, Vietnam in 1970. As a result, he received a shrapnel wound to his mouth and lips and injured his teeth.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, a letter from his former dentist, his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge), and his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of error which occurred on 15 May 1970, the date of his discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 5 March 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant military records show he entered active duty (AD) on 28 August 1969, as a heavy vehicle driver (64B). He served in Vietnam from 16 February to 15 May 1970 when he was released from AD and was transferred to the Army Reserve.
4. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-14 and M-16). His DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
5. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show an entry in item 40 (Wounds) and does not show the Purple Heart as an entry in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
6. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action.
7. The applicant underwent a separation medical examination on 15 May 1970 and was found qualified for separation.
8. The applicant provided a copy of an extract of his dental records which stated that he sustained a blow to the face while serving in Vietnam. It also stated that he had a large laceration to his lip and was treated.
9. The applicant provided a copy of a letter from his former dentist, dated 21 July 1994. He states that the applicant was seen during his residency in periodontics at the VA Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee. His chief complaint was swelling in the anterior part of his maxilla (the irregularly shape bone that with its fellow forms the upper jaw; it assists in the formation of the orbit, the nasal cavity, and the palate, and lodges the upper teeth). His past history revealed trauma to injured area during combat. An examination was performed which revealed a partial denture in the anterior maxilla and scarring of soft tissue. He concluded that the applicant's dental problems were a result of trauma during combat.
10. The applicant provided a copy of his VA Rating Decision, dated 1 November 1994, which shows that he was granted 20 percent for a service-connected disability for mouth injury, mid lower lip. His compensation was later decreased to 10 percent based on improvement in his service-connected scar of the mid-lower lip. There is no indication in the available records to show that his mouth injury was the result of hostile action.
11. The applicant’s medical records are unavailable for review by this Board.
12. The applicant’s name failed to appear on the Vietnam Casualty List for a wound received in 1970 during his service in Vietnam as a result of enemy action.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
14. The regulation also provides that one bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each named campaign. A review of the regulation and the applicant's records shows that he is entitled to two bronze service stars.
15. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows that he sustained a mouth injury while serving in Vietnam. He was awarded 20 percent for his service-connected injury that was later decreased to 10 percent. However, this evidence failed to indicate that his mouth injury was the result of hostile action.
2. There are no orders officially awarding the applicant the Purple Heart. Therefore, based on the available evidence presented, there is insufficient basis to approve or show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.
3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 15 May 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 14 May 1973. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
4. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant's records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__sc____ __sp____ __js____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087883 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031216 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19700515 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | Deny/GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 61 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069177C070402
There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The applicant received the Army Commendation Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010310
His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart and the Vietnam casualty roster does not list his name. A VA Form 07-3101 shows he requested medical and dental records from the VA. In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to award the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001398
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Purple Heart for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. In the absence of official orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009690
His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows in: * item 40 (Wounds) no entry * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Purple Heart 5. The applicant provides: a. It states the Purple Heart is awarded to members wounded in action and states that in order to award the Purple Heart, there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by military medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078750C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: While the attending dentist supports the applicant's contention that he is entitled to the award of the Purple Heart, the Board finds that there is insufficient evidence to corroborate the dentist's recollections some 19 years after the fact.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012793
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. he served in Vietnam from 5 January 1970 through 14 February 1971; b. on 18 January 1970, his second day in an operational assignment in Vietnam, he became a helicopter door gunner with A Troop, 2nd Squadron, 17th Calvary and he served in that capacity for his entire tour of duty; c. his awards are listed as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Aircraft Crewman Badge, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009279
The applicant provides copies of: * his application to register for the draft or enlist * his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 November 1945 * his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) * his Separation Qualification Record * his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) showing U.S. Navy service ending 23 October 1952 * a letter from a former Soldier, dated 29 December 1994 * a letter from former Soldier,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020053
d. The applicant contends that he has found certain existing and new evidence of record via statements made by various medical officers. A DA Form 8-118, dated 11 May 1971, reports that an MEB determined the applicant was unfit for duty due to vascular headaches and recommended his presentation to a PEB. The applicant contends that his medical condition has worsened and the VA currently rates him as 50-percent disabled; therefore, his U.S. Army disability rating should now be raised accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064762C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064767C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The statement submitted in support of the applicant's request was rendered more than 20 years after the fact, and the author's statement that he was assigned with the applicant in Company...