| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Commendation Medal.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was appointed to an administrative position involving sensitive material at Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, DIVARTY (Division Artillery).
3. He notes that shortly after the arrival of his new commander problems began to arise.
4. He states that people who should have been promoted were not, orders were being held, and “things just seem to appear very strange.”
5. He states that eventually a post-card was found in the mailroom, which was authored by his commander, and contained derogatory racial remarks. He notes that the commander was eventually relieved of his command in January 1990.
6. The applicant states that his section sergeant recommended him for an award of the Army Commendation Medal, but his commander denied the award stating that he had an outstanding telephone bill. The applicant indicated that he had paid the bill and was given no further explanation for the denial of his award. However, because he worked in the administrative section he knew that orders for the award had been issued.
7. The applicant provides his self-authored statement in support of his request, but submits no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice, which occurred in 1992. The application submitted in this case is dated 29 February 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant served an initial period of active duty between 1982 and 1986. He was released from his initial period of active duty in pay grade E-4 with an honorable characterization of service. He was awarded an Army Achievement Medal during his initial period of active duty.
4. On 2 August 1988 the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade
E-4, for a period of 4 years.
5. Following his August 1988 enlistment he was assigned to the 6th Battalion of the 1st Field Artillery element in Germany where, according to his Department of the Army Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), he was assigned duties as a cannon crewman (13B).
6. In December 1988, according to his records, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, DIVARTY as a cannon crewman.
7. On 8 November 1989 the applicant was punished under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for speeding in a tactical vehicle, disobeying a lawful order, and wrongfully appropriating a military vehicle. The UCMJ action, which indicated that the applicant was serving in pay grade E-3 at the time, was initiated by one company commander in September 1989, but finalized by another company commander in November.
8. According to the applicant’s file he returned to the 6th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery on 15 November 1989.
9. The applicant departed Germany in November 1991.
10. There is no indication in available records that the applicant was ever recommended for an award of the Army Commendation Medal.
11. Following the applicant’s return to the United States he was assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia and ultimately discharged by reason of physical disability on
3 September 1992.
12. The applicant’s authenticated Department of Defense Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) does not reflect award of the Army Commendation Medal.
13. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after
6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
14. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/Records) states, in pertinent part, that award recommendations for the Army Commendation Medal will be filed an individual’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) when the award recommendation is downgraded or disapproved. The correspondence that disapproved or downgraded the award will also be filed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence, nor has the applicant provided any, that he was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal.
2. The applicant’s records indicate that he was assigned to the DIVARTY between December 1988 and November 1989 and during that period was punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ and reduced to pay grade E-3 from his enlistment grade of E-4.
3. It is unlikely that a recommendation for an award of the Army Commendation Medal would have been initiated in view of the applicant’s record of misconduct while assigned to that organization.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
5. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 3 September 1992; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 3 September 1995. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JNS __ __MDM__ __BJE __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087760 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031118 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016694
Five awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's initial period of active duty service. Three awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's second period of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 27 August 1985 to 2 June 1988; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075571C070403
Two general orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal are in his file -- General Orders 1868, Headquarters, U. S. Army, Europe and Seventh Army dated 16 April 1975 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 December 1969 to 13 December 1972) and General Orders 210, Headquarters, U. S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill dated 21 January 1974 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal third award for the period 14 December 1972 to 13 December 1975). His...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013301
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal because he served in Korea; however, the service medal was authorized after he was discharged from the U.S. Army. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002624
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * awards that were given for participation in the Defense of Saudi Arabia, Liberation and Defense of Kuwait, and Cease-Fire Campaigns * Meritorious Unit Commendation 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Southwest Asia. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003264
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Humanitarian Service Medal * Arkansas Emergency Service Ribbon * Army Superior Unit Award * Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) C (recruiter) 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * Army Achievement Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021857
The Soldier must retire on the approved retirement date. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Second, the approval authority for Soldiers who request retirement in lieu of PCS is the Commander, HRC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003465
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 January 1992 to show award: * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) with arrowhead * one bronze service star for the Parachutist Badge * Combat Patch (shoulder sleeve insignia (SSI)) 2. Evidence in the record does confirm that the applicant participated in a combat parachute jump on 20 December 1989 as part of Operation Just Cause and as such, is entitled to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000810
His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows his awards as: * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Air Assault Badge * U.S. Army Lapel Button 9. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the ROK from December 1988 to November 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004437
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (4th Award). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022603
The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (6th Award) and the Korea Defense Service Medal. His record reflects five awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the last of which was for the period 1 November 1986 to 31 October 1989. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...