Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087717C070212
Original file (2003087717C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 29 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087717

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Lester Echols Member
Mr. Frank C. Jones Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. In effect, this constitutes a request for removal or waiver of those disqualifications which preclude reenlistment.

APPLICANT STATES: That he would like to rejoin the military to defend his country in this time of crisis. He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant’s military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 July 1984. He had continuous service until his separation. He was promoted to Staff Sergeant, E-6 on 1 March 1997. He was assigned to the Fort Lee, Virginia, Noncommissioned Officer Academy as a Small Group Leader around July 1998.

On or about 5 October 1999, the applicant was given a memorandum of reprimand for attempting to initiate an inappropriate personal relationship with at least two female students and for asking one of them to lie about his behavior.

The applicant submitted a statement in rebuttal. He asserted that all allegations made against him were false and were based upon his willingness to be tough in disciplining the students.

The Fort Lee commanding general reviewed the applicant's statement in rebuttal and directed the reprimand be filed in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File.

The applicant's noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) for the rating period July through October 1999 contains several adverse comments concerning the inappropriate relationship incident.

On 31 August 2000, the applicant was recommended for a Qualitative Management Program (QMP) bar to reenlistment. The NCOER for the rating period July through October 1999 and the memorandum of reprimand were identified as the documents used as the basis for the bar.

The applicant appealed the QMP bar to reenlistment (the appeal is not available). On 9 April 2001, he was notified that his appeal was disapproved and that he would be required to separate 90 days after receiving pre-separation counseling; that the narrative reason for his separation would be "non-retention on active duty;" that his separation code would be "JGH;" and that his RE code would be "4."

The applicant was honorably discharged on 5 September 2001, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 19-12, in pay grade E-6, with a reentry code of 4. His separation designator code of “JGH” indicates this was an involuntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 19-12. He had completed 17 years, 1 month, and 26 days of creditable active service and had no lost time.

Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 19, contains policy and procedures for voluntary and involuntary separation, for the convenience of the Government, of Regular Army NCOs and U. S. Army Reserve NCOs serving on Active Guard/Reserve status, under the QMP. NCOs whose performance, conduct, and/or potential for advancement do not meet Army standards as determined by the appropriate recommendation of Headquarters, Department of the Army centralized selection boards responsible for QMP screening will be denied continued service. It is designed to (1) enhance the quality of the career enlisted force, (2) selectively retain the best qualified soldiers, (3) deny continued service to nonproductive soldiers, and (4) encourage soldiers to maintain their eligibility for further service.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

The Separation Program Designator Code (SPD)/Reentry (RE) Code Cross-Reference Table dated March 2001 states that RE code 4 will be used for soldiers discharged under the QMP.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. In view of the fact the applicant was denied reenlistment under the QMP, the assigned reentry code of 4 was and still is appropriate. The applicant was disqualified from reenlistment and the disqualification is not waivable.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION
: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lls___ __le____ _fcj ____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087717
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030529
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086524C070212

    Original file (2003086524C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the noncommissioned officer evaluation report covering the period 990501 [1 May 1999] thru 000131 [31 January 2000] be removed from her military records; that her removal from active duty pursuant to the QMP (Qualitative Management Program) be set aside; that her RE Code be changed from "4" to RE Code "1" on the grounds that she was fully qualified for reenlistment in the Army; and that she be retired pursuant to the provisions of the Temporary Early...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063973C070421

    Original file (2001063973C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 November 1985. The applicant’s separation authority on his DD Form 214 was listed as “to be determined.” The conversion of the QMP from a Headquarters Department of the Army bar to reenlistment to a Headquarters Department of the Army administrative separation program was approved around early 1998. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008783

    Original file (AR20130008783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 21 February 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130008783 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests a change to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075163C070403

    Original file (2002075163C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. NCOs whose performance, conduct, and/or potential for advancement do not meet Army standards as determined by the appropriate recommendation of Headquarters, DA centralized selection boards responsible for QMP screening will be denied continued service. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068584C070402

    Original file (2002068584C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record also...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070906C070402

    Original file (2002070906C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 September 1999 the applicant’s battalion commander counseled the applicant concerning her bar to reenlistment, informing her that she had three options in response to the notification of her bar – (1) appeal the action, which had to be submitted through her chain of command in sufficient time to arrive at EREC (Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center) not later than 60 days from 14 September 1999, and if her appeal was not submitted within 45 days to her commander, she would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011770C070208

    Original file (20040011770C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    LaVerne Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by changing his separation code and the narrative reason for his separation. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065842C070421

    Original file (2001065842C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. The applicant’s military records were screened by the 1995 Master Sergeant Selection/Sergeant QMP Board and he was properly identified for a DA bar to reenlistment under the QMP in accordance with AR 601-280.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079217C070215

    Original file (2002079217C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It notes that "JCC" is the appropriate SPD for individuals separated upon completion of an enlistment contract but who are "ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088158C070403

    Original file (2003088158C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As supporting evidence, the applicant provides a memorandum from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) dated 1 July 2002 explaining the results of the Special Review Board's consideration of her NCOER appeal; two nonrated statements dated 1 July 2002 reference the two removed NCOERs; and the modified third NCOER (for the period ending June 1998). Paragraph...