Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087530C070212
Original file (2003087530C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 30 September 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087530

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge be upgraded.

APPLICANT STATES: That he didn’t know that he could request a change and that he had a mental illness while in the service. He feels that he deserves an honorable discharge because he served the country honorably.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered active duty on 8 December 1964. He completed training and served as a communications center specialist.

On 18 January 1965 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP), under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for stealing two candy bars.

On 24 August 1965 a summary court-martial found the applicant guilty of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 16 through 19 August 1965.

On 3 October 1965 the applicant was apprehended by the military police for auto theft and driving without a license.

On 4 October 1965 he threatened to commit suicide by attempting to overdose on malaria pills. He was prevented from taking these pills but he ran off and got some other pills. When he was prevented from taking those pills he became abusive and the military police were called to take him to the hospital for observation.

Between 11 October 1965 and 13 November 1965 the applicant either threatened to or attempted to commit suicide four more times.

On 13 November 1965 he was given a psychiatric evaluation. He was diagnosed as having an immature personality with poor judgment, emotional instability, and poor self-control. The doctor stated that the applicant’s instability and immaturity rendered him a likely prospect for future “maladaptive behavior.” He was psychiatrically cleared to participate in appropriate administrative action.

The applicant was returned to duty and due to loss of his security clearance was placed in a new unit performing administrative duties.

The applicant’s company commander noted that the applicant's behavior and duty performance continued to be poor and on 12 February 1966 initiated discharge proceeding for unsuitability.

On 14 February 1966 the applicant acknowledged that he had been counseled and advised of the discharge action. He was afforded the opportunity to consult with a lawyer, to have his case reviewed by a board of officers and to submit statements on his own behalf. He waived all of these rights.

On 26 January 1966 the applicant received NJP for failure to go to his appointed place of duty.

On 1 March 1966 the discharge authority approved the recommendation to discharge the applicant and directed that he receive a general discharge.

He was discharged on 11 March 1966 for unsuitability with a general discharge. He had 1 year and 3 months of creditable service with 4 days lost.

Army Regulation 635-209, in effect at the time, set forth the policy and prescribed procedures for eliminating enlisted personnel for unsuitability. Action was to be taken to discharge an individual for unsuitability when, in the commander's opinion, it was clearly established that: the individual was unlikely to develop sufficiently to participate in further military training and/or become a satisfactory soldier or the individual's psychiatric or physical condition was such as to not warrant discharge for disability. Unsuitability included inaptitude, character and behavior disorders, disorders of intelligence and transient personality disorders due to acute or special stress, apathy, defective attitude, and inability to expend effort constructively, enuresis, chronic alcoholism, and homosexuality. Evaluation by a medical officer was required and, when psychiatric indications are involved, the medical officer must be a psychiatrist, if one was available. A general or honorable discharge was considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record and applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.

2. The Board finds that there is insufficient evidence or mitigating factors to support an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RJW__ ___MHM ___MVT__ DENY APPLICATION




         Carl W. S. Chun
         Director, Army Board for Correction
         of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087530
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030930
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 144.9323
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606882C070209

    Original file (9606882C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 December 1966 the applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 because of his lack of appropriate interest and his inability to adjust to military life. That official stated that elimination for unfitness is not considered appropriate. A certificate by the applicant’s former commander indicates that the applicant had been transferred to a hospital unit for rehabilitative reasons, that it was...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-106

    Original file (2009-106.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this regard, the Board notes that the number for an “Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood” is 309.0; the number for an “Unspecified Mental Disorder (non-psychotic)” is 300.9; and the num- ber for a “Personality Disorder, not otherwise specified” is 301.9. However, the discharge notification dated June 20, 1980, strongly supports his claim that his command told him he was being discharged due to a general lack of adaptability, and the August 6, 1980, psychiatric note and the very...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00438

    Original file (ND02-00438.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920221: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder as evidenced by medical evaluation and unsatisfactory job performance related to the personality disorder. I believe that SN (Applicant)'s suicidal gesture indicates an unwillingness to accept the Navy way of life, and I believe that she remains potentially self-destructive. "920303 BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge by reason of convenience of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064974C070421

    Original file (2001064974C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088778C070403

    Original file (2003088778C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A neuropsychiatric...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077641C070215

    Original file (2002077641C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in an undated letter received on 1 July 2002, that the Board reconsider his previous application wherein he asks that his General Discharge (GD) be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge (HD) by reason of medical disability, and that he be provided back pay and allowances -- ostensibly for a disability retirement -- dating to 9 January 1969. Copies of VA (Veterans Administration) medical records from 11 January 1984 and 15 July 1985 showing diagnoses of generalized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006207

    Original file (20080006207.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military psychiatrists further stated that the applicant’s character was consistent with his life history and behavior. With respect to the applicant’s medical discharge, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any substantiating evidence that shows he was issued a permanent medical profile or that he underwent a medical evaluation board (MEB) or a physical evaluation board (PEB). The Army must find that a Soldier is physically unfit to reasonably...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00876

    Original file (BC-2004-00876.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is 22 years old now and he realizes he wanted to make something of his life, something he knew he could be proud of and that people would respect. The Medical Consultant states the applicant was administratively discharged for Adjustment Disorder characterized by depressed mood, suicidal ideation, irritability and moodiness, poor concentration and sleep disturbance. Evidence has not been provided in support of his appeal, which would lead us to believe that a change to his reenlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009399

    Original file (20110009399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 November 1969, the applicant's commander initiated a request to discharge the applicant for unsuitability under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations – Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability). There is no evidence that shows he was diagnosed with PTSD or any mental condition prior to his discharge sufficient to warrant disposition through medical channels. Although the applicant contends he should have been given a medical discharge, the evidence of record...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601188

    Original file (MD0601188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AXIS III: None known Recommendation: Although he is fit for full duty, he has a severe personality disorder that renders him unsuitable for continued military service. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19950121: Applicant’s SF93, Record of Medical History, indicates “No” answers to “Have you ever attempted suicide?” and “Have you ever had or have you now depression or excessive worry?” Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date...