Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087420C070212
Original file (2003087420C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087420


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Mr. Mark D. Manning Member
Ms. Barbara J. Ellis Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

3. The applicant states, in effect, that he injured his right eye on 20 November 1966 in Vietnam. He contends that he took a "ricochet," had glass in his eye and that he was medically evacuated on 21 November 1966 to the battalion area where a doctor examined his injury. He also contends that the commanding officer and medic put him in for award of the Purple Heart; however, the captain was shot and the medic was killed. The applicant did not provide any evidence in support of his claim.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he served in the U.S. Marine Corps from 28 June 1957 to 27 June 1960. He enlisted in the Regular Army on
6 January 1964 for a period of 3 years. The applicant served as an infantry indirect fire crewman assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion of the 35th Infantry in Vietnam from 28 December 1965 through 14 December 1966. On 14 December 1966, the applicant was honorably discharged in the rank of staff sergeant after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 9 days of creditable service with no lost time.
5. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar as authorized awards.

6. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

7. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

9. The applicant's service personnel records show that he participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.

10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant's unit is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

12. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an eye injury sustained on 20 November 1966 in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record available to the Board, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for any wounds or injuries sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2. Considering the applicant attained the rank of staff sergeant in less than three years, the Board concludes the applicant met eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 January 1964 through 14 December 1966 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

4. The applicant's unit received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, this unit award should also be added to his DD Form 214.

5. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records but only as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 January 1964 through 14 December 1966.

2. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected by showing that he was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

3. That so much of the application as pertains to award of the Purple Heart be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

JNS____ MDM____ BJE_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____John N. Slone________
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087420
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031118
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2. 107.0000
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018235

    Original file (20140018235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018381

    Original file (20070018381.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal-First Class, two awards of the Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088893C070403

    Original file (2003088893C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066730C070402

    Original file (2002066730C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in one campaign during his assignment in Vietnam which is not correctly shown by award of one bronze service star for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, in accordance with the governing regulation, the applicant is entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal and correction of his military records to show this award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000346C070206

    Original file (20050000346C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 February 1968 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001849

    Original file (20080001849.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 3 June 1964 through 2 June 1967; and b. amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017714

    Original file (20060017714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017714 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There are no general orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088371C070403

    Original file (2003088371C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22, section I provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001803C070206

    Original file (20050001803C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal because he qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and was evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action. The Army Board for Correction of Military Records does not issue medals. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001803C070206

    Original file (20050001803C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action on 31 January 1966 in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 31 January 1966 in Vietnam; b. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 March 1964 through 7 April...