| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Member | |
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant did not provide a statement with his application. The Board notes that the application indicates there were letters of recommendation provided in support of the applicant’s claim; however, these letters are not available for consideration.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted on 28 June 1971 for a period of 2 years. While in basic combat training, on 15 October 1971, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 13 September 1971 to 19 September 1971. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay.
On 7 December 1971, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of being AWOL from 15 November 1971 to 22 November 1971. He was sentenced to forfeit $150 for one month and confinement at hard labor for 30 days. On
8 December 1971, the convening authority approved the sentence but suspended confinement for 90 days.
The applicant went AWOL on 1 January 1972, he was apprehended by civil authorities on 10 June 1972 and was returned to military control on 12 June 1972.
The available records do not contain a Charge Sheet or the applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. However, the available records show that the applicant’s intermediate commanders recommended that his request for discharge be approved. On 3 July 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an undesirable discharge.
The applicant was discharged on 28 June 1971 with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. He had served 6 months and 21 days of total active service with
176 days of lost time due to AWOL.
On 1 July 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board reviewed the applicant’s case under the Special Discharge Review Program and denied his request for a discharge upgrade to honorable.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that
a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge, may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board reviewed the applicant’s brief record of service which included one summary court-martial, one nonjudicial punishment, and 176 days lost time and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. The Board also determined that his military service was not satisfactory. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to an honorable discharge or a general discharge.
3. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
4. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation appear to be appropriate.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JLP____ AAO_____ PHM_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003087365 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030923 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19710628 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, Chapter 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | For the good of the service |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070005281 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 4 May 1972, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062301C070421
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 2 February 1972 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. Evidence of record also shows the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 16 February 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for fraudulent entry.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015652
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015652 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 9 March 1972, the applicant was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002103C070206
On 26 February 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an undesirable discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 22 March 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. The applicant’s record of service included five nonjudicial punishments and 171 days of lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100415C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 24 March 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s record of service included a bar to reenlistment, five nonjudicial punishments, two special court-martial convictions and 239 days of lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000568
Army Regulation 635-200 provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. In his request for discharge for the good of the service, the applicant stated he would continue to go AWOL if his discharge was not approved. After his request for discharge was approved he again went AWOL and was discharged without returning to military control.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017933
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. In his recommendation, the CO stated that the applicant had gone AWOL on three previous occasions for which he received NJPs and a special court-martial. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002168
The applicant states, in effect, that he served in the Regular Army honorably for 2 1/2 years. His characterization of service was honorable. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011124
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 March 1972, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 - for the good of the service in lieu of trial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021885
The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In that statement he indicated: * he had been working to help support his mother and two little brothers prior to his being drafted in May 1971 * his mother passed away from cancer and he went into the Army * he went to Fort Ord for advanced individual training and got married in July 1971 * he then went to the Oakland Replacement Station where he went AWOL on 22 October 1971 * he was returned to Fort...