| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Army of Occupation Medal. He states that he served in Germany for more than 1 year and needs the award in order to maintain membership in the Veterans of Foreign Wars organization. In support of his request he submits a copy of his honorable discharge certificate from the United States Army Reserve and a copy of his 1965 separation document.
3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 15 January 1964 and successfully completed training prior to being assigned to Germany as an automotive maintenance specialist in June 1964.
4. The applicant was promoted to pay grade E-3 in December 1964 and in December 1965 he returned to the United States where he was released from active duty on 28 December 1965 with an honorable characterization of service. His separation document indicates that he qualified as a marksman with the
M-14 rifle, but does not reflect entitlement to any other awards or decorations.
5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the Army of Occupation Medal was established in 1946 and awarded for service in Europe between 9 May 1945 and 5 May 1955.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the National Defense Service Medal to soldiers who had honorable active served between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. There is no evidence in the applicant's official military personnel file that his commander ever disqualified him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There is also no evidence of any misconduct or disciplinary actions in the applicant's file. His conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service were excellent.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant may have served in Germany for more than a year, his service was not during the period for which the Army of Occupation Medal was awarded. As such, he is not eligible for that award.
2. However, the Board does note that the applicant is entitled to an award of the National Defense Service Medal, which was omitted from his separation document.
3. The Board also notes that the applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 28 December 1965. There is no evidence his commander ever disqualified him from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying him the award. In view the foregoing, the Board concludes that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award him that decoration for the period 15 January 1964 through 28 December 1965.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 15 January 1964 through 28 December 1965; and
b. by showing that he is entitled to the National Defense Service Medal.
2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
__AAO __ __TL ___ __HBO__ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Arthur A. Omartian_____
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003087206 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030828 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001659306C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. He states the awards “were deleted” from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). His honorable service also entitles him to a National Defense Service Medal and his record should be corrected accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064436C070421
There are no orders in the applicant’s records which show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant’s DD Form 214, with an effective date of 16 September 1966, shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the Good Conduct Medal during his first period of eligibility (20 September 1961 through 20 September 1964).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010157C070208
The applicant requests a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Good Conduct Medal. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he is entitled to the following decorations: the Purple Heart; the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal; the Vietnam Service Medal; the National Defense Service Medal; the Vietnam Campaign Medal; the Parachutist Badge; the Combat Infantryman Badge;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004734C070206
The applicant requests, in three separate DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552), correction of his records to add the following awards: the Good Conduct Medal; the Presidential Unit Citation; the Valorous Unit Award; the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm; the Vietnam Service Medal; and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, he is entitled to correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019236
The applicant requests award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award 2. The applicant states: * his service was honorable and exceptional yet he was not awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal because he took an early discharge from combat service in Vietnam * Army Regulation allows for the belated award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) established...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083882C070212
The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) Item 23a shows that the applicant was awarded MOS 11B2P on 13 November 1964 and held that MOS for 2 years, 4 months and 14 days. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. That all of the Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008267C080410
The applicant requests that his records be corrected by adding his awards, and the Cold War Certificate to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The Award of the Cold War Recognition Certificate is not governed by the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-2 (Military Awards) and, as a result, is not shown on a discharge document. The DA From 1577, dated 5 June 2002, from the National Personnel Records Center, submitted by the applicant, show...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018002
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 23 September 1969 to 22 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015840
Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to Soldiers who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that Headquarters and Headquarters...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076236C070215
Based upon the applicant's wound, the Board will give the applicant the benefit of doubt and recommend that he be awarded the CIB. The Board is of the opinion that the only reason he wasn't awarded the GCM was because he was discharged prior to the expiration of his term of service due to disability. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by: a. showing that the individual concerned was awarded the CIB; b. showing that he was...