Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087060C070212
Original file (2003087060C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 30 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003087060

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Chairperson
Mr. Ernest W. Lutz Member
Mr. Larry C. Bergquist Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) be changed to show option C. He also requests that his daughter be removed from item 15a (Last name, first, M.I.) as an unmarried dependent child under age 22.

APPLICANT STATES: That at the time he filled out this form he was separated from his wife, that he is now divorced, and that he was unclear on what type of option to choose. He also contends that his daughter is over the age of 22 now and her name should be removed from item 15a.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was born on 5 April 1951. After having had prior enlisted service in the New York Army National Guard, he was commissioned as a Reserve officer, in the Army National Guard, on 2 October 1983.

The applicant's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was prepared on 17 December 1990. On 9 January 1991, he completed a DD Form 1883 electing children only coverage, option B, full base amount and indicating that he had two dependent children (a daughter and son). Item 9c of the DD Form 1883 explains each option. The applicant and his spouse signed immediately below the explanation.

Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan, enacted
30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he was unclear on what type of option to choose. However, the applicant completed a DD Form 1883 and made a decision to provide an annuity beginning on the 60th anniversary of his birth should he die before that date, or on the day after his death should he die on or after his 60th birthday by electing option B. The reverse of the DD Form 1883 clearly explained the three options and the consequences of not electing options A or C. The applicant signed the DD Form 1883.

3. The Board also considered the applicant's contention that his daughter is over the age of 22 now and her name should be removed from item 15a. However, at the time the applicant executed this form on 9 January 1991 his daughter was under the age of 22. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service takes into account the passage of time when determining dependent Survivor Benefit Plan eligibility and costs.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

CLG____ EWL___ LCB______ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003087060
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031030
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013439

    Original file (20130013439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY, dated 25 June 2013 * DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate), dated 26 April 1995 * two death certificates * DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity) * birth certificate * DD Form 2790 (Custodianship Certificate to Support Claim on Behalf of Minor Children of Deceased Members of the Armed Forces), dated 10 June 2013 * DD Form 2788 (Child...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003512

    Original file (20120003512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000391C070208

    Original file (20040000391C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since it thus appears the applicant did not give her consent to the FSM's child only coverage RCSBP election, by law the FSM's RCSBP election defaulted to spouse coverage. The FSM did not indicate on the DD Form 1883 which option he desired. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for child only coverage, full base amount, option C but that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100662C070208

    Original file (2004100662C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This retirement official confirms that upon receiving his Twenty-Year Letter, the applicant completed his RCSBP election form by electing “Spouse Only” full coverage under Option C (Immediate Coverage). By law, children who became physically or mentally incapacitated while in an eligible status (under age 18, or over age 18, but under age 22 and still in school full time) are eligible to receive SBP benefits. In view of the facts of this case and given the HRC recommendation, it would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005239

    Original file (20130005239.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) to show he elected "Spouse only" coverage. The applicant provides: * Marriage certificate * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60, dated 4 November 1999 * DD Form 1883, dated 14 December 1999 * Certificate of Death * Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 26 April 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010758

    Original file (20140010758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected enrollment in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C (Immediate Coverage) instead of Option A (Deferred Coverage). Once a member elects either option B or option C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. When the applicant received his 20-year letter, he submitted a DD Form 1883 wherein he indicated that he declined to participate in the RCSBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005632C070206

    Original file (20050005632C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 October 1999, the FSM elected to terminate his participation in the SBP. The applicant's daughter is listed as the annuitant on DFAS's 17 February 2005 letter to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM did not request termination of his SBP in October 1999 but continued to remain enrolled in the SBP for child-only coverage; b. collecting any SBP costs due; and c. paying to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067152C070402

    Original file (2002067152C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of his deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for option C. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002790C070206

    Original file (20050002790C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883. The FSM's 20-year letter was issued in 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005565

    Original file (20120005565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant provides medical records showing the FSM underwent treatment for brain and lung cancer beginning in March 2010. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of the FSM's record to show he elected spouse coverage under the RCSBP.