| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Beverly A. Young | Analyst |
| Mr. Robert J. Wagner | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member | |
| Mr. Robert Duecaster | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be changed to a medical discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was punished for having a medical disability due to the disease of alcoholism. In support of his application, he submitted a supplemental letter and a Transfer Summary from the Southwest Mississippi Mental Health Complex.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 April 1964. He completed basic combat training at Fort Polk, Louisiana and was further assigned to Fort Sill, Oklahoma, for advanced individual training (AIT).
On 21 October 1964, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 10 July 1964 to 30 August 1964. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for four months (suspended for four months) and forfeiture of $52.00 pay per month for four months.
The applicant was punished under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failing to go to his appointed place of duty.
On 3 September 1965, he received a second Article 15, UCMJ for failing to report for KP duty at the time specified and after reporting to KP duty he was relieved for being under the influence of alcohol.
The applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of being AWOL from 17 September 1965 to 13 February 1966. He was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of $60.00 pay per month for six months, and reduction to the grade of private E-1.
The applicant indicated on his Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 4 April 1966 that he had an excessive drinking habit.
The applicant's Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 4 April 1966 shows he had been diagnosed as having a passive-aggressive personality. The examining physician stated that the applicant had no mental or physical defects which would warrant medical disposition. At that time, he was found to be medically qualified for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208.
The complete facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant's discharge proceedings are not present in his personnel records. However, his DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged on 19 May 1966 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness due to an established pattern of shirking with an undesirable discharge. He had completed 1 year, 1 month, and 27 days total active military service with 337 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
The applicant provided a Transfer Summary, dated 7 August 1995 from the Southwest Mississippi Mental Health Complex in which he was diagnosed as having alcohol dependence.
Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. The regulation provided for the discharge of individuals by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it had been determined that an individual’s military record was characterized by one of more of the following: frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities; sexual perversion; drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit forming narcotic drugs or marijuana; an established pattern for shirking; or an established pattern showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts.
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The unfitness is of such a degree that a soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty. In pertinent part it states that an enlisted soldier may not be referred for, or continue, physical disability processing when action has been started under any regulatory provisions which authorizes a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It also states that the commander exercising general court-martial jurisdiction over the soldier may abate the administrative separation if the general court-martial convening authority finds that the disability is the cause, or a substantial contributing cause, of the misconduct that might result in a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
3. There are no medical records which indicate any medical condition incurred that would render the applicant medically unfit. Alcohol abuse does not excuse misconduct.
4. The Board has determined that the applicant's discharge was proper and correct at the time and there is no basis to change his undesirable discharge to a medical discharge.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
RJW____ RD______ MJT____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086942 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030826 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19660519 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-208 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unfitness due to an established pattern shirking |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Chun |
| ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057637C070420
On 9 April 1964, the board of officers convened and after considering all the evidence that was submitted, found the applicant unfit for further service and recommended an undesirable discharge. He completed 1 year, 6 months and 10 days of creditable active service.On 25 July 1969, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a change in the type and nature of his discharge. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014239
Army Regulation 15-185 sets forth procedures for processing requests for correction of military records. On 2 March 1966, a board of officers met and recommended the applicant's discharge from the service because of unfitness with an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052894C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 14 October 1981, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068363C070402
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 22 July 1965, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. Army Regulation 635-200 is the current regulation that governs the separation of enlisted soldiers.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017155C070206
The unit commander stated as a reason why it would not be considered feasible or appropriate to recommend elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 was the applicant’s attitudes of complete disregard for authority and his attitudes toward life in general. On 7 December 1960, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. After review of the evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000041
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000041 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 29 September 1964, he was discharged accordingly with his service characterized as under conditions other than honorable. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge (GD) is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002442
On 20 August 1965, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and directed the issuance of an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Active Duty Administrative Separations), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004586C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). The applicant states, in effect, that the number of days he was absent without leave (AWOL) was actually four and not seven. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant shows he completed a total of 2 years, 6 months and 7 days of creditable active military service, and that he accrued 7 days of time lost due to AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067566C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In this letter, the applicant was informed that he could submit a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board in accordance with Army Regulation 15-180. However, records show the applicant signed a letter during his last duty assignment at Fort Hood, Texas, acknowledging that he could submit a request for an upgrade of his discharge to the Army Discharge Review Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078227C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As supporting evidence, he provides his two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the Untied States Report of Transfer or Discharge); his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 30 May 1963; his notice of an Undesirable Discharge; his Undesirable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 June 1964; and seven character witness statements. A general discharge is a separation from the Army...