Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086858C070212
Original file (2003086858C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 17 July 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086858

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Richard P. Nelson Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Ms. Regan K. Smith Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) he completed be corrected to show full coverage instead of reduced coverage.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the benefit election, as explained to him, was applicable only to the pay he was receiving at the time he made the election. He further states that “other options were not explained or offered.”

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was born on 8 December 1944. He enlisted in the US Army Reserve on 4 November 1965 for a period of six years. He later attended Officer Candidate School and was commissioned a Second Lieutenant in the Corps of Engineers on 23 August 1970. The applicant remained in the US Army Ready Reserve until 1980, when he transferred to the Missouri Army National Guard. There, he completed his military career, eventually attaining the rank of colonel and transferring to the retired reserve on 3 November 1999.

The National Guard Bureau sent the applicant his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (his 20-Year letter) on 15 April 1986. This letter was filed in his military personnel records.

The applicant and his spouse signed the DD Form 1883 on 12 May 1986, electing to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse and child coverage, reduced amount ($500.00), option C. Block 9a, of the form, consists of two boxes; the first reflects “full” coverage, the second reflects “reduced” coverage. The applicant checked the “reduced” coverage box.
Block 9b, of the form, instructs the applicant to indicate the amount of retired pay (base amount) upon which to compute the annuity, if he/she elects the reduced amount option in Block 9a. The applicant indicated $500.00.

Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death does not occur before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the member's retired pay (costs for option C being the more expensive). A member must make the election within 90 days of receiving the notification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60 or else wait until he/she applies for retired pay and elect to participate in the standard SBP. If the member was married but elected not to participate at the maximum level or elected to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse, that member’s spouse would be notified of that election.

Public Law 101-189, enacted 29 November 1989, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 October 1991 (but deferred to 1 April 1992) – 30 September 1992. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

Public Law 101-510, enacted 5 November 1990, delayed the start of the third Open Season to 1 April 1992 – 31 March 1993.

Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established an Open Season to be conducted 1 March 1999 – 29 February 2000. It required that enrollees live two years from the effective date of election for beneficiaries to be eligible for an annuity. Extensive publicity was given in Army Echoes.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s request to correct his records to show that the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) he completed be corrected to show full coverage instead of reduced coverage.

2. Evidence of record shows that both the applicant and his spouse both signed the DD Form 1883 on 12 May 1986.

3. The Board noted that the language of the DD Form 1883, signed by the applicant and his spouse, is very clear and logical in its content. Block 9a explicitly addresses “annuity based on the full amount of retired pay or on a reduced amount of retired pay.” The applicant and his spouse clearly elected a reduced amount. Block 9b goes even further to instruct the service member to specifically identify the amount of retired pay upon which he/she wants the annuity computed. In this case, the applicant and his spouse indicated $500.00.

4. The applicant has not presented any evidence to show that he and his spouse were misled as to the content or intent of the DD Form 1883 when they completed it.

5. The Board noted that the applicant is a senior military officer, very competent and capable of understanding the importance and the content of the form he was completing.

6. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___jtm___ ____jhl__ ___rks___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086858
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20030717
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017777

    Original file (AR20080017777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that either his 1990 RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election be changed from Option C-Spouse Only-Reduced Annuity to Option A-Defer or that he be permitted to increase his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to an annuity based on the full amount of retired pay effective upon reaching age 60 without a concurrent change to the RCSBP coverage. The applicant states that when he submitted his retirement package at age 60 he elected full SBP benefits. He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011212

    Original file (20100011212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * It was the FSM's wish for her to be his SBP beneficiary * The FSM would have turned 60 years of age on 21 August 2009 * DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) was signed and submitted * She was the spouse of a service member who served 33 years in the Army and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and sacrifices were made mutually * They were married for 37 years * The FSM served in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and Air Medal 3. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005326

    Original file (20070005326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the FSM's records be corrected to show that he completed an RCSBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) election certificate and that she be granted a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP), enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60, to provide an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011191

    Original file (20110011191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested spouse Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage in a timely manner. He provided a DD Form 1883, dated 1 May 1994, which shows on that date he was not married and he elected to participate in the RCSBP for children only coverage, full base amount, option C (Immediate Annuity). Evidence indicates he first attempted to request a change to his SBP election in conjunction with his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012389

    Original file (20090012389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicates that if his records are corrected to show he elected spouse coverage he should not owe back pay for 10 years, only 2 years. The applicant provided a DD Form 2656-6, dated 18 July 2006, which shows he elected to change his SBP election from child only to spouse only. The applicant married on 30 May 1998 and he had one year from his date of marriage to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023506

    Original file (20110023506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election that shows the applicant married Pamela R. R----, on 6 October 2007; that he had no dependent children; and he elected to participate in the SBP with spouse only coverage, based on full gross retired pay, with the full enrollment premium amount deducted from his retired pay in 24 monthly installments. The applicant married on 6 October 2007; however, there is no evidence that he elected RCSBP spouse coverage within 1 year of the marriage date. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005892

    Original file (20080005892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that she and the FSM married on 29 December 2003 and that they made application for retired pay at age 60 on 8 November 2005. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017906C070206

    Original file (20050017906C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jerome Pionk | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage instead of children only coverage. Postal Service; a DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record), dated 1 August 2005; a letter, dated 15 October 2005, from DFAS; and a letter, dated 25...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013594

    Original file (20090013594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. He married the applicant on 18 September 1980. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...