Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086831C070212
Original file (2003086831C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 28 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086831

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Carolyn Wade Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member
Ms. Marla J. N. Troup Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his rank be restored from private (PVT/E-2) to specialist (SPC/E-4).

APPLICANT STATES: That he was not given a fair trial after he requested a court-martial rather than accepting nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). In support of his application, he provided a rambling, threatening statement and declared that the Board should just take his word in the matter.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 May 1959 for a period of 3 years. He completed language training and was assigned to Germany as a voice intercept operator. On 25 October 1961, the applicant was promoted to SPC.

On 11 January 1962, the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of failure to obey the lawful order of a senior noncommissioned officer (NCO) and of knowingly making a false official statement with intent to deceive. The approved sentence included reduction to private first class (PFC/E-3). On 29 January 1962, he was further reduced to PVT after accepting NJP for misconduct.

On 6 April 1962, the applicant was again convicted by a summary court-martial of failure to report to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. He was sentenced to 30 days’ hard labor and forfeiture of $70.00 pay per month for 1 month.

On 20 April 1962, Special Orders Number 110 directed the applicant’s separation and transfer to the United States Army Reserve (USAR). He was separated under the provisions of paragraph 7, Army Regulation 635-205 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) by reason of early release of overseas returnee.

Accordingly, on 24 April 1962, the applicant was separated with a general, under honorable conditions discharge in the rank of PVT/E-2. He was credited with 2 years, 11 months, and 24 days of creditable service.

Army Regulation 635-205, then in effect, provided for the separation of soldiers for the convenience of the Government. Paragraph 7 provided for the early separation of overseas returnees with less than 60 days remaining service.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant’s record shows he was reduced by a summary court-martial from SPC/E-4 to PFC/E-3, and by NJP from PFC/E-3 to PVT/E-2. The Board determined that the summary court-martial and NJP were imposed in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies, then in effect. The punishments imposed were not disproportionate to the offenses and there is no evidence of violation of any of the applicant's rights.

3. The Board concludes that the applicant’s rank is appropriately shown on his DD Form 214 as private (PVT/E-2) and that there is no basis for changing it to specialist (SPC/E-4).

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rjw___ __lds___ __mjnt__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086831
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031028
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 133.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075595C070403

    Original file (2002075595C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was barred from reenlistment and identified as substandard prior to his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057420C070420

    Original file (2001057420C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant has failed to convince the Board through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that his discharge was unjust and should be upgraded. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2001057420SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20010920TYPE OF DISCHARGE(GD)DATE OF DISCHARGE19621009DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR 635-205 DISCHARGE REASONEarly release of overseas returneesBOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013100

    Original file (20060013100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error that occurred on 22 May 1970, the date of his separation. His punishment for this offense was a reduction to private first class (PFC).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008143

    Original file (20050008143.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 January 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050008143 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for three years and entered active duty on 27 July 1961. On 26 June 1964, the applicant’s unit commander recommended the applicant be barred from...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008367

    Original file (20050008367.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued upon his separation shows he completed a total of 5 years of active military service. The applicant contention that the date of his separation entered on his DD Form 214, 31 July 1964, is in error and that the effective date of his separation was actually 9 August 1964, and the supporting statement he submitted were carefully considered. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon his separation confirms he was released from active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003329C070206

    Original file (20050003329C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge to honorable. The facts and circumstance concerning the applicant’s discharge are not in the available records, however on 18 March 1963, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-205 (Early Release Overseas Returnee), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was not a member of the Inactive Reserve at the time of his discharge and separated in 1963, prior to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021330

    Original file (20140021330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. The wrongful use of marijuana allegation was contained in a Report of Investigation, 50th Military Police Detachment, Headquarters, Fort Amador, CZ, dated 22 March 1962. c. The Commander proposed to reduce the applicant for inefficiency under the provisions of paragraph 30d, Army Regulation 624-200. d. The applicant was instructed to acknowledge receipt of the letter and to submit any matters deemed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018540

    Original file (20130018540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the end of the duty day, all the medical platoon personnel were called to the platoon sergeant's (PSG) office and told of a surprise health and welfare inspection of the rooms of the personnel living in the barracks and their vehicles. He consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action for misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs, the type of discharge he could receive, its effect on further enlistment or reenlistment, the possible effects...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076587C070215

    Original file (2002076587C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, one special court-martial conviction, one summary court-martial conviction and 38 days lost.