Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086680C070212
Original file (2003086680C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 28 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086680

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Carolyn Wade Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member
Ms. Marla J. N. Troup Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to honorable.

APPLICANT STATES: That he is trying to correct the mistakes he made earlier in his life. He states that he was young and stupid when he committed his misconduct and that since 11 September 2001, the shame of his misconduct is unbearable.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 March 1972 for a period of 3 years. He enlisted for the station of choice enlistment option, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, with basic combat training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and airborne training duty option. Following completion of all required military training, the applicant was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B, Light Weapons Infantryman, and was assigned to Fort Bragg.

On 24 September 1973, the applicant departed his unit absent without leave (AWOL). The applicant remained absent until 2 October 1973. On 10 October 1973, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). His punishment consisted of reduction to private/E-2 (suspended for 30 days) and 14 days’ extra duty.

On 24 October 1973, the applicant accepted NJP for failing to go his appointed place of duty on 3 separate occasions. His punishment consisted of reduction to private first class/E-3 and forfeiture of 7 days’ pay ($88.00).

On 27 December 1973, the applicant departed his unit AWOL and remained absent until on or about 2 January 1974.

On 7 January 1974, the applicant departed his unit AWOL and remained absent until 28 February 1974 when he was apprehended by civil authorities.

On 12 March 1974, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for the above two periods of AWOL. On 20 March 1974, having been advised by counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulations 635-200 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. He submitted a statement in his own behalf indicating that he wanted out of the military. He stated that there was no reason for him to stay in the military because he had gotten a job while AWOL. He stated that he was now out of debt, had a little money in the bank, and did not desire to be a Soldier any more.

On 27 March 1974, the applicant’s chain of command recommend his request for discharge be approved with a UD.
On 28 March 1974, the applicant’s request for discharge was found to be legally sufficient. The Deputy Post Judge Advocate recommended approval of the request and stated that the applicant had indicated that he would resist attempts at rehabilitation.

On 29 March 1974, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge with a UD.

Army Regulation 635-200, then in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A UD was normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. After consulting with defense counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he admitted guilt to the stipulated offenses under the UCMJ. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3. The applicant’s recurring periods of AWOL totaling 66 days constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of soldiers in the Army and adversely affected the quality of his service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. These incidents of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a general or honorable discharge.

4. The Board noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards, to include age. The Board further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.


5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__rjw___ __lds___ __mjnt__ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086680
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031028
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19740410
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, Chap 10
DISCHARGE REASON A70.00
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018091

    Original file (20140018091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. A review of his record shows he repeatedly went AWOL and he had almost 8 months of lost time due to being AWOL or in confinement at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071659C070402

    Original file (2002071659C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He further states that he served two tours in Vietnam, received many awards during his 7 years of service, and was promotable to the pay grade of E-6. He was transferred to Vietnam on 26 August 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074499C070403

    Original file (2002074499C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the applicant states that while he was still serving in the RVN, the Army implemented a plan to reduce all ASA four year enlistments to three years. The applicant claims that he and four other members of his team were in-processing in at Fort Bragg at the same time on a Monday morning upon their return from Germany. The Board notes the applicant’s contentions that he was misled by his recruiter into accepting a four year instead of a three year enlistment; that he was abused...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010251C070208

    Original file (20040010251C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication that the applicant requested an upgrade of his discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) within its 15-year statute of limitations. He was cleared for separation by competent medical authority, and there is no indication he suffered from any disabling physical or mental condition at the time of his discharge. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067842C070402

    Original file (2002067842C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He had served 1 year, 8 months and 28 days of total active service and had 97 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070662C070402

    Original file (2002070662C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010207C080407

    Original file (20070010207C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge for health reasons. The evidence of record further shows the applicant voluntarily requested discharge to avoid a court-martial that could have resulted in his receiving a punitive discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021673

    Original file (20140021673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. However, his record contains separation orders and a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 7 May 1974 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 in lieu of a trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the applicant's records and he provides none to show his discharge was considered by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018612

    Original file (20070018612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: M Chairperson M Member M Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his Undesirable Discharge (UD) be upgraded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009653C070208

    Original file (20040009653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Kenneth Lapin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. ____ John Slone______________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR20040009653 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON |YYYYMMDD | |DATE BOARDED |19740516 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(UD) | |DATE OF...