Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086624C070212
Original file (2003086624C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 19 August 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086624

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Margaret V. Thompson Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that she be reinstated in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR).

APPLICANT STATES: That due to her personal family situation, she was unable to pursue the education requirements required to be promoted to major. She provides her application for [re]appointment packet; a letter from her Representative in Congress; and a letter from the commander of the 2d Battalion, 3d Brigade, 84th Division as supporting evidence.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

She entered active duty as a Regular Army second lieutenant after graduating from the U. S. Military Academy on 22 May 1985. She was promoted to captain on 1 October 1989. She was honorably separated on 23 May 1990 after submitting an unqualified resignation. She was appointed a first lieutenant in the USAR on 23 May 1990. She was promoted to captain in the USAR on an unknown date.

By memorandum dated 6 June 1997, the applicant was notified that she had been considered but not selected for promotion. Her records indicated she had not completed the required civilian or military education (apparently the Officer Advanced Course) by the date the board convened (11 March 1997).

Apparently, the applicant was not selected for promotion a second time. She was discharged from the USAR effective 19 February 1999.

Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes policy and procedures used in the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States and commissioned and warrant officers of the USAR. Table 2-1 states that service requirements for promotion from captain to major by a mandatory board are 7 years in the lower grade. In pertinent part, it states that, to qualify for selection, commissioned officers must complete the educational requirements in table 2-2 not later than the date the selection board convenes. Table 2-2 states that to qualify for promotion from captain to major the officer must complete any Officer Advanced Course.

Army Regulation 135-175 prescribes the policies and criteria governing the separation of Reserve officers of the Army. In pertinent part, it states that an officer in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who has completed his or her statutory military service obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components selection board.

Army Regulation 135-100 provides procedures for the appointment of commissioned and warrant officers in the Reserve Components of the Army. In pertinent part it states that commissioned officers twice passed over for promotion or otherwise released from active duty or active status are not eligible for appointment. Individuals in this category are eligible to apply for appointment as a USAR warrant officer if otherwise qualified.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 14505 states that a captain on the reserve active-status list of the Army, who has failed of selection for promotion to the next higher grade for the second time and who has not been selected for continuation on the reserve active-status list, shall be separated in accordance with section 14513 of this title not later than the first day of the 7th month after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered the officer for the second time.

Title 10, U. S. Code, section 14513 states that each reserve officer of the Army who is in an active status and whose removal from an active status or from a reserve active-status list is required by section 14505 shall (1) be transferred to an inactive status if the Secretary concerned determines that the officer has skills which may be required to meet the mobilization needs of the officer's armed force; (2) be transferred to the Retired Reserve, if the officer is qualified and applies for such transfer; or (3) if the officer is not transferred to an inactive status or to the Retired Reserve, be discharged form the officer's reserve appointment.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board has considered the circumstances behind the applicant failing to complete the required education to qualify for promotion to major. However, it appears that at the time of her second nonselection for promotion to major the Secretary did not determine that she had skills which could be required to meet mobilization needs. Regardless of whether she now has such skills, since she did not meet the criteria for transfer to an inactive status or transfer to the Retired Reserve at the time, she was required by statute to be discharged from her reserve appointment.

3. It would not be equitable to grant the applicant a waiver of the education requirement (presumably completion of an Officer Advanced Course) when all other captains are required to complete the same educational requirements prior to becoming eligible for promotion to major. The Board concludes that neither would it be equitable to reinstate the applicant in the USAR when, by regulation, being twice nonselected for promotion to the next higher grade makes one ineligible for appointment in the USAR.

4. Regrettably, in view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__fne___ __mvt___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086624
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030819
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 102.09
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003944C070208

    Original file (20040003944C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. He requests that the Secretary of the Army convene a special board to determine that he is entitled to be restored to active duty or to an active status in a Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106064C070208

    Original file (2004106064C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. Army Regulation 350-100 (Officer Active Duty Service Obligations) states, in pertinent part, that officers graduating from the Special Forces Detachment Officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019115

    Original file (20140019115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * his five deployments as a Department of the Army (DA) civilian be recognized as active duty military service * the issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) reflecting his service and all associated awards and decorations 2. Organization clothing and individual equipment will be issued to EE personnel and other civilians who may be deployed in support of military operations. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018355

    Original file (20140018355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Army Regulation 135-180 states in paragraph 2-1 that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have: (1) attained age 60, (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service, and (3) served the last 8 years of his or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017511

    Original file (20130017511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she served on active duty as well as the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the USAR; she was denied promotion to LTC * her promotion packet was pulled due to the erroneous belief that she did not have enough retirement points/qualifying years for promotion * she was slotted in an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) slot and worked for Army Broadcasting from 1 July 1995 to 1 March 2003 * the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) erroneously listed her in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008346

    Original file (20060008346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12646(a) states that, if on the date prescribed for the discharge of transfer from an active status of a reserve commissioned officer he is entitled to be credited with at least 18, but less than 19, years of service, he may not be discharged or transferred from an active status without his consent before the earlier of the date on which he is entitled to be credited with 20 years of qualifying service or the third anniversary of the date on which he would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068203C070402

    Original file (2002068203C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be reinstated as a captain in the Civil Affairs (CA) Branch. He goes on to state that he requested an appointment as a CA officer and his request was granted, however, on the same day, the appointment was revoked without explanation. On 23 August 2001, the ARPERSCOM dispatched a memorandum to the applicant informing him that he had again been nonselected for promotion by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000374C070208

    Original file (20040000374C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he received an OER for the period 1 May 1989 through 30 April 1990. The evidence of record shows that the applicant contacted USAHRC – STL (AR-PERSCOM at the time) in October 2001 concerning reappointment and was told to contact another office to see if he was eligible. There is insufficient evidence on which to justify a correction to the applicant's records (such as showing that he was discharged from the USAR prior to being twice nonselected for promotion to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000081

    Original file (20130000081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records as follows: * revoke Orders 12-228-00030, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command (USARC), Fort Bragg, NC, on 15 August 2012, honorably discharging him from the USAR * reinstate him to Reserve Active Status List * promote him to major (MAJ) per the Fiscal Year 2012 MAJ Army promotion list that was released on 8 November 2012 2. As a result of the delay of the MAJ Board Results stated in Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010853

    Original file (20130010853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by reinstating him in the Active Army Reserve and selecting him for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/pay grade O-5. Additionally, he did not meet the MILED requirement to request a MILED waiver as outlined in HQDA, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 policy dated 24 May 2010. c. The applicant states he was 50% ILE, MILED completed which is true; however, 50% ILE is not the required course completion to request a MILED waiver. ...