Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086583C070212
Original file (2003086583C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        

                  BOARD DATE: 9 September 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086583

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Shirley L. Powell Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Thomas A. Pagan Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his record be corrected to show he is entitled to non-regular retired pay at age 60.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he served for a sufficient period of time on active duty and in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to qualify for retirement pay, but he continues to be denied this benefit. He states that each time he requests retirement, he gets a different response as to the number of years/points credited to him for retired pay purposes. He states that he has been fighting with the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) for his retirement benefits for 11 years and it is now time to elevate this matter in order for him to receive the benefits to which he is entitled.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He served in various active and Reserve Component (RC) capacities between
19 January 1950 and 31 October 1992. Orders Number 232-24, dated
23 November 1992, issued by the State of Texas, Adjutant General’s Department, directed the applicant’s discharge from the Army National Guard (ARNG) and as a Reserve of the Army effective 31 October 1992.

The separation document (NGB Form 22) issued to the applicant on the date of his discharge shows that he held the rank of sergeant and that he had completed a total of 17 years and 4 months of RC service and 1 year and 9 months of active military service as of 31 October 1992.

A 20 November 2002 letter from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, ARPERSCOM, confirms that a complete review and update of the applicant’s record resulted in a correction of his Retirement Points Accounting System (RPAS) summary point sheet that resulted in his being credited with 15 years,
7 months, and 28 days of qualifying service for retired pay.

In connection with the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from ARPERSCOM personnel officials. It states that a review of the applicant’s records failed to show that he should be credited with any additional service beyond that outlined in the 20 November 2002 letter from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch. It further indicates that if the applicant has any documentary evidence to show he is entitled to additional service credit or retirement points, he should provide that evidence to the appropriate ARPERSCOM officials so that a correction to his records can be made. If no further documents are provided, no further corrective action can be taken in regard to this issue.

On 1 July 2003, the applicant was provided a copy of the ARPERSCOM advisory opinion in order to have the opportunity to rebut its contents. To date, he has failed to respond.
Title 10 of the United States Code, section 12731 (10 USC 12731) provides the age and service requirements necessary to qualify for non-regular retired pay at age 60. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to be eligible for retired pay a member must be age 60 and must have performed at least 20 years of qualifying service.

10 USC 12732 provides the legal guidance on determining entitlement to retired pay and computation of years of service. It states that the years of qualifying service required to receive non-regular retired pay at age 60 for each one-year period after 1 July 1949 in which the individual has been credited with 50 points on the point basis outlined in the law.

DISCUSSION
: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he served a sufficient period of time to be eligible for retired pay at age 60. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. The evidence of record confirms that although the applicant served in the military for a period of time spanning over 20 years, he only received enough points to be credited with 15 years, 7 months, and 28 days of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60. Therefore, since he has not completed the 20 years of qualifying service necessary to be eligible to receive retired pay, the Board finds no evidentiary basis upon which to support granting the requested relief.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ______ GRANT

________ ________ ______ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

WTM___ __TAP__ __SLP _ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records



INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086583
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/09/
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1992/10/31
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY NGR 600-200
DISCHARGE REASON ETS
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1021 100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084108C070212

    Original file (2003084108C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It indicates that the applicant was a member of either the ARNG or USAR continuously from 10 October 1960 until being discharged on 11 December 1992. Further, based on a review of the applicant’s personnel records and all documents and evidence he provided to the Board, ARPERSCOM officials determined the applicant completed 19 qualifying years for retirement purposes, and a minimum of 20 qualifying years is required to be eligible for retired pay. The evidence of record confirms the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062784C070421

    Original file (2001062784C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that in order for a Reserve officer below the rank of lieutenant colonel to be credited with satisfactory service in a higher grade, they must have served satisfactorily in that grade as a Reserve commissioned officer in an active status, or in a retired status on active duty, for not less than six months. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083892C070212

    Original file (2003083892C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be authorized a non-regular retirement and retired pay from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). In the applicant’s case, he had completed only four years of qualifying service in the USAR. The evidence of records confirms the applicant was credited with qualifying service for retired pay purposes for 16 years of active duty service and 4 years of USAR service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013486

    Original file (20140013486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To be eligible for retired pay at age 60 under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731-12737, a Reserve Soldier or former Reserve Soldier must have completed 20 qualifying years of service, the last 8 of which must have been in an RC. b. HRC reviewed his Reserve Retirement Statement, his letter, and his documents, and determined he completed 19 years, 7 months, and 13 days of qualifying service. However, at the time the applicant was separated (November 1992) a member of the Selected Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077570C070215

    Original file (2002077570C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be extended past his mandatory removal date (MRD) of 7 December 2002 to earn additional qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement. The Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089546C070403

    Original file (2003089546C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 28 April 1986, the date of his discharge. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve-Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), indicates, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012706

    Original file (20070012706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 05 February 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070012706 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he has the additional time for 20 qualifying years, thereby making him eligible for retirement pay at age 60. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087273C070212

    Original file (2003087273C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed the 20 years of qualifying service necessary to receive Reserve non-regular retired pay at age 60. This official further stated that at the time the applicant had 19 years of qualifying service for retirement, he was given the authority to stay in the active Reserve until he attained 20 qualifying years of service or reached age sixty, whichever came first, and the applicant had attained age...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074057C070403

    Original file (2002074057C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List and authorized to receive retired pay effective 26 April 1987, the date he turned 60 years of age, and that he be provided all back retired pay due as a result. However, it is clear that the applicant first contacted ARPERSCOM personnel officials requesting retired pay on 18 November 1989, which was well within 6 year statute of limitations based on the date from which his claim for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089639C070403

    Original file (2003089639C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the rank of the individual concerned as First Lieutenant on the Retired List; by providing him retired pay based on the pay formula most favorable to him based on his satisfactory service in both pay grades 0-2 and W-2, and...