| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member | ||
| Mr. Robert Duecaster | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was told that his discharge would be automatically upgraded 6 months after he was discharged.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He was born on 5 June 1957 and he enlisted on 20 March 1979, for a period of 4 years, training as an armor crewman and a cash enlistment bonus. He completed his training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, and was transferred to Germany on 31 July 1979. He was advanced to the pay grade of E-2 on 20 September 1979.
On 19 June 1980, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for sleeping on his guard post and for shoplifting from a local department store. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-1, a forfeiture of pay and extra duty.
On 12 January 1980, NJP was imposed against the applicant for being disrespectful in language and deportment towards a superior noncommissioned officer (NCO). His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
On 26 June 1981, NJP was imposed against him for being incapacitated for the performance of his duties due to his previous indulgence in intoxicating liquor and for being drunk and disorderly. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2, a forfeiture of pay, extra duty and restriction.
He departed Germany on 26 July 1981 and was transferred to Fort Stewart, Georgia.
On 3 March 1982, charges were preferred against the applicant for two specifications of being disrespectful in language towards a superior NCO and one specification of assaulting an NCO by swinging at him with his fist.
On 25 March 1982, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request he indicated that he was making the request of his own free will, without coercion from anyone and that he was aware of the implications attached to his request. He also admitted that he was guilty of the charges against him or of lesser included offenses which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He acknowledged that he understood that he could receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of all benefits as a result of such a discharge. He further declined to submit a statement or explanation in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority (a brigadier general) approved his request and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 21 April 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had served 2 years, 1 month and 2 days of total active service.
In October 1982, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge and contended at that time that he knew he had made a lot of mistakes; however, during the 6 months that had elapsed since his discharge, he had tried to do the best he could. The ADRB determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny his request on 29 March 1983.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate and there have never been any provisions for an automatic upgrade of such discharges.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by courtmartial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
2. Accordingly, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances.
3. After being afforded the opportunity to assert his innocence before a trial by court-martial, he voluntarily requested a discharge for the good of the service in hopes of avoiding a punitive discharge and having a felony conviction on his records. In doing so he admitted guilt to the charges against him. While he may now believe that he made the wrong choice, he should not be allowed to change his mind at this late date, especially considering his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rd ____ ___kh___ ___gw___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086532 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/07/31 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1982/04/21 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200/CH10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | GD OF SVC |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 144.7000 | 689/A70.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001350
The applicant states that she was almost getting out of the Army on an honorable discharge before she was charged with disobeying a staff sergeant in the laundry. Accordingly, she was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 21 July 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or of a lesser included...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001211C070206
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 25 January 1980, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001211C070206
Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 25 January 1980, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070796C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080710C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The appropriate authority approved his request on 28 February 1983 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions while on excess leave, on 18 March 1983, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078436C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 1 October 1982, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007414
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. The appropriate authority approved his request on 10 May 1982 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072759C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to either an honorable or medical discharge. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should have been discharged by reason of medical disability because he was addicted to drugs and alcohol and was never offered any help for his illness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000082C070205
The applicant states, in effect, that he served 6 years and received an honorable discharge; however, his last discharge was under other than honorable conditions and he desires an upgrade of that discharge because it has been over 20 years since he was discharged. After reviewing all of the evidence and testimony presented, the ADRB determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny his request on 7 May 1982. The U.S. Court of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002901C070205
The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. He was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey, where charges were preferred against him for the AWOL charge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.