| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Ms. Gail J. Wire | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member | ||
| Mr. Robert Duecaster | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That his exposure to cocaine was the result of other individuals smoking around him while he was attending a party. He states, in effect, that he inhaled the smoke and then he tested positive for cocaine use, which was the reason why the level of cocaine found in his system was very low. He states that he has never directly used cocaine and that he is now seeking veterans benefits for a shoulder injury, which was incurred while he was on active duty.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 18 January 1977 he enlisted in the Army for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. He successfully completed his training as an infantryman. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 17 March 77, to pay grade E-3 on 12 May 1977 and to pay grade E-4 on 1 May 1978. He completed 2 years, 6 months and 6 days of total active service and he remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments. He went on to be promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 11 December 1979 and to pay grade E-6 on 21 July 1982.
On 18 December 1985, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of wrongfully using marijuana. He was sentenced to a reduction to the pay grade of E-5, a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $200.00 per month and to be reprimanded.
Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant on 29 January 1987, for wrongfully using some amount of cocaine. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-4 and a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $509.00.
On 23 February 1987, the applicant was counseled by his commanding officer (CO) regarding testing positive on a urinalysis that he had taken on 23 December 1986. During the counseling session his CO informed him that he must be processed for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12(c) for misconduct based on commission of a serious offense and for a pattern of misconduct based on a positive urinalysis for marijuana. His CO also informed him that his conduct could not and definitely would not be tolerated from noncommissioned officers in his unit and that he should understand the affects of a less than fully honorable discharge.
Accordingly, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12(c) for misconduct based on commission of a serious offense – use of illegal drugs. He
acknowledged receipt of the notification on 24 February 1987. After consulting with counsel, he waived his right to a personal appearance before an administrative separation board and he opted not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 29 March 1987. Accordingly, on 24 April 1987, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12(c) for misconduct based on drug abuse. He had completed 10 years and 3 months of total active service.
On 13 May 1994, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of the regulation deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and provides that individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated prior to their normal expiration of term of service. Individuals in pay grades E-5 and above must be processed for separation upon discovery of a drug offense. Those in pay grades below E-5 may also be processed after a first drug offense and must be processed for separation after a second offense. The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors, which would tend to jeopardize his rights.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
3. The Board has noted the applicant’s contentions. However, the evidence of record clearly shows that he was initially convicted by a special court-martial of using cocaine. He tested positive for marijuana on a urinalysis and as a result, he had NJP imposed against him. In view of the applicant's acts of indiscipline, his discharge was properly characterized.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___rd ___ ___kh___ ___gw___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086448 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/07/31 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1987/04/24 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 14-12(c) |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 626 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 660 | 144.6600/DRUG ABUSE |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010399
The separation packet also includes statements from one officer and six noncommissioned officers, all dated on or about 15 March 1990, recommending the applicant receive an honorable discharge. On 23 May 1990, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12(c) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) for misconduct citing his wrongful use of marijuana and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069319C070402
During one of the counseling sessions, the applicant admitted to the first sergeant, in the presence of a witness, that his friends at Fort Bragg had repeatedly used marijuana in his apartment and offered that as the basis for his positive urinalysis. After hearing testimony and reviewing the evidence presented, the board found that the applicant was undesirable for further retention in the military service because of abuse of illegal drugs and recommended that he be discharged under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120001780
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using illegal drugs, he tested positive for cocaine and marijuana at a unit urinalysis (090911) for which he received a field grade Article 15, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014885
The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 23 April 1980, for 3 years. The applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-2, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a general discharge, on 1 May 1987. However, it appears that the applicant's overall record was taken into consideration by the battalion commander and separation authority based on his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005810
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of marijuana (031202); the applicant was caught smoking marijuana and admitted to it during questioning by CID, and convicted by a Summary Court-Martial for this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012337
The applicant provided no evidence to show his discharge violated his Eighth Amendment rights. The notes in the applicant's service medical records state that in order for him to get a correction to an incorrectly recorded date of an accident, he needed to obtain a hospital report from the civilian hospital. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003528
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 September 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007384
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge (UOTHC) to a general discharge (GD). The applicant's separation packet is not contained in the available records; however, a duly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a UOTHC discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000495
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (050108-050118), was found in wrongful possession of marijuana on (070507) and disobeyed a lawful general regulation by wrongfully possessing a marijuana pipe, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013814
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states in effect: A General discharge does not accurately characterize my service in the United States Army. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of...