Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
Ms. Joyce A. Hall | Analyst |
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
Mr. John P. Infante | Member | |
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he received an honorable discharge in April of 1963. He reenlisted under the name of J---- S----- A----. He was discharged in January 1965 with an undesirable discharge. The stigma of an undesirable discharge has been with him for the past thirty-eight years. In shame of his undesirable discharge he changed his name to R---- S----R------ in 1979. The evidence that was submitted in support of his undesirable discharge was half-truths. The racial climate was different then and he questioned his commanding officer's ethics and motives. His commanding officer took advantage of his ignorance; he signed documents without question in an effort to rid himself of his (commanding officer's) abuse and control. His Captain deceived him; he was led to believe that the documents he signed were merely a formality pertaining to an early separation. This discharge is an injustice to him and all of the good things that the Army represents. The applicant provided a copy of his Social Security Card and a copy of his Arizona driver's license showing his new name and date of birth with his application.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 20 September 1962, the applicant enlisted in the U. S. Naval Reserve for
8 years. On 16 October 1962, the applicant was called to active duty for training. On 15 April 1963, the applicant was honorably released from active duty. On
23 April 1963, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.
The highest pay grade he achieved was pay grade E-3.
Between 14 November 1963 through 1 September 1964, while assigned to a unit in Germany, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on seven occasions for being drunk and disorderly, failure to repair, absent without leave, causing a vehicle accident, being off post without a pass, absent from his appointed place of duty, and missing bed check twice. His imposed punishments included forfeitures, confinement at hard labor, restrictions, extra duty, and pay grade reduction.
On 8 December 1964, the applicant's commander recommended that he be discharged prior to the expiration of his term of service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. The commander's recommendation was based on the applicant's prolonged series of offenses, his apathetic attitude, and his general inability to adjust to the Army.
On 10 December 1964, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial
(SPCM) of wrongfully giving a U.S. Armed Forces ID card to a German National taxi driver. He was sentenced to a forfeiture of $50.00 pay month for 1 month, and 30 days confinement at hard labor, and a reduction to pay grade E-1.
A mental status evaluation and a separation medical examination found the applicant qualified for separation. He was considered mentally and physically competent to participate in board proceedings.
The applicant was advised by counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action and the rights available to him. The applicant waived personal appearance, consideration, and representation by counsel before a board of officers. He was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf but declined to do so.
On 23 December 1964, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On
18 January 1965, the applicant was discharged in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. He completed 1 year, 7 months, and
28 days of creditable active duty service this enlistment period with 28 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-208, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness. The regulation provided for the discharge of individuals by reason of unfitness with an undesirable discharge when it as been determined that an individual’s military record was characterized by one of more of the following: frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities; sexual perversion; drug addiction or the unauthorized use or possession of habit forming narcotic drugs or marijuana; and established pattern for shirking; or an established pattern showing dishonorable failure to pay just debts.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.
The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board noted the applicant's allegation of the racial climate being different; however, there is no evidence of record nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to support his allegation of racial discrimination.
2. The Board reviewed the available records pertaining to the applicant's service, which included seven NJPs and one SPCM.
3. Based on the applicant's record of indiscipline, the Board determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, the applicant did not meet the criteria for an honorable discharge. The Board also determined the applicant's service was not satisfactory; therefore, he did not meet the criteria for a general discharge.
4. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_AAO___ __YM____ __JPI___ DENY APPLICATION
INDEX
CASE ID | AR2003086408 |
SUFFIX | |
RECON | YYYYMMDD |
DATE BOARDED | 2003/07/24 |
TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1965/01/18 |
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-208 |
DISCHARGE REASON | |
BOARD DECISION | DENY |
REVIEW AUTHORITY | Mr. Carl S. Chun |
ISSUES 1. | 144.0000 |
2. | |
3. | |
4. | |
5. | |
6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076587C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included four nonjudicial punishments, one special court-martial conviction, one summary court-martial conviction and 38 days lost.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087830C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 April 1966, the applicant accepted NJP for being absent from his unit on 23 March 1966. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052894C070420
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 14 October 1981, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081395C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 18 May 1966, the applicant's commander initiated a recommendation to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for unfitness, due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with civil/military authorities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078227C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. As supporting evidence, he provides his two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the Untied States Report of Transfer or Discharge); his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 30 May 1963; his notice of an Undesirable Discharge; his Undesirable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 June 1964; and seven character witness statements. A general discharge is a separation from the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086189C070212
On 18 December 1963, the applicant's commander formally counseled him that he was recommending that he be discharged from the Army. in Item 4 (Organization at Time of Separation), on the DD Form 293, Application for Review of Discharge or Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States. On 2 September 1965, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) reviewed the applicant’s case and after determining that his discharge was proper and equitable, it denied the applicant’s request for an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057637C070420
On 9 April 1964, the board of officers convened and after considering all the evidence that was submitted, found the applicant unfit for further service and recommended an undesirable discharge. He completed 1 year, 6 months and 10 days of creditable active service.On 25 July 1969, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a change in the type and nature of his discharge. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004960C070205
Edward Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence that the FSM applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to upgrade his fathers’ discharge to honorable or general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011299
The entire evaluation was not in records available to the Board, but the second page of the evaluation recommended that the applicant receive a hardship discharge if all requirements were met or, if not applicable, that he be administratively separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unsuitability). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008869C070208
On 18 August 1962, he was assigned to Fort Benning, Georgia for completion of airborne training. He had completed 2 years, 1 month and 16 days of active military service. The available evidence does not indicate the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board under that board's 15-year statute of limitation.