Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086255C070212
Original file (2003086255C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 16 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086255

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Ms. Mae M. Bullock Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the period 29 November 1999 through 29 January 2000 be credited as active duty time.

APPLICANT STATES: That he separated by reason of his expiration term of service on 21 November 1999 to enter the Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) program on 29 November 2000. He should have had a break of only 7 days. Because he signed his reserve contract while he was still on active duty, which is standard, he was told his contract was invalid. He was told he had to go through the Military Entrance Processing station. During all this, his orders arrived the day after he should have report for AGR training. Since his orders were cut on 23 November 1999, he should have been able to get his orders on time. However, because AGR entry classes are held 3 months apart, he had to wait until January 2000.

As supporting evidence, the applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his separation orders (Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood Orders 274-0213 dated 1 October 1999); III Corps and Fort Hood 1st endorsement dated 6 October 1999 amending Orders 274-0213; U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) Orders R-11-007633 dated 23 November 1999; AR-PERSCOM Orders R-11-007633A01 dated 3 December 1999; an undated and unaddressed Memorandum for Record from the applicant; and his 6 October 1999 U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment contract.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 September 1991 and had continuous service until his expiration term of service on 21 November 1999.

The applicant enlisted in the USAR, as an in-service recruit, on 6 October 1999. The 1st endorsement to Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood Orders 274-0213 dated 1 October 1999 required him to report to his troop program unit of assignment within 30 days of his discharge from active duty.

AR-PERSCOM Orders R-11-007633 dated 23 November 1999 ordered the applicant to active duty in an AGR status. He was to report to AGR entry training effective 28 November 1999. These orders apparently were not received by the applicant by 28 November 1999. AR-PERSCOM Orders R-11-007633A01 dated 3 December 1999 amended his report date to AGR entry training to 30 January 2000.

Army Regulation 601-209 (In-Service Recruiting Program) establishes Department of the Army policy governing the In-Service Recruiting Program, which is designed to retain qualified service members within the Total Army.

Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) prescribes criteria for the Army Retention Program for (1) immediate reenlistment or extension of enlistment of soldiers currently serving in the Active Army and (2) enlistment/transfer and assignment of soldiers processing from the Active Army to the Reserve Components of the Army.

Chapter 7 (Enlistment/Transfer Processing of Soldiers from the Regular Army to the Reserve Components), paragraph 7-9 of Army Regulation 601-280 states that soldiers enlisting or transferring into the USAR may consummate their enlistment transfer documents no earlier than 120 days prior to release from active duty. Paragraph 11-8 states that the effective date of a Reserve Component enlistment is the day after discharge from the Regular Army. The date on the enlistment or transfer documents will be the date the action is consummated.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Director, Full Time Support Management Directorate, AR-PERSCOM. That office recommended disapproval of the applicant's request. That office noted that his 6 October 1999 USAR enlistment contract was a valid enlistment contract and there was nothing in their case tracking system to indicate that personnel at their office advised him he had an invalid enlistment contract. That office noted that, although they do not know why the applicant did not receive his active duty orders sooner, since he missed his original report day he was rescheduled for the next available class and his orders amended accordingly. He entered the USAR AGR Program on 30 January 2000 and that is the date his active duty time began.

A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal. He did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The applicant consummated his enlistment in the USAR on 6 October 1999, well within the 120 days-prior-to-discharge period specified by Army Regulation 601-280. There is no evidence to show that his enlistment in the USAR was invalid.

3. The Board notes that the applicant was originally scheduled to enter active duty as an AGR on 28 November 1999, 7 days after he was separated from the Regular Army. For an unknown reason, he did not receive those orders until after his report date to AGR entry training. Having missed that training date, he was rescheduled for the next available training date on 30 January 2000.

4. While it is regrettable the applicant missed his initially scheduled training date, it would not be equitable to credit him with active duty he did not serve.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__aao___ __hof___ __mmb___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR20030886255
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031016
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 100.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106206C070208

    Original file (04106206C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    That same document contained a statement, initialed by the applicant, which read that he was “not a previous recipient of a bonus for enlistment, reenlistment, or extension of enlistment in a reserve component.” c. Department of the Army Form 5435-1-R (Statement of Understanding – The Selected Reserve Montgomery GI Bill Kicker Program) indicating that he was enlisting in the United States Army Reserve as a prior service candidate and that he was entitled to the MGIB-SR Kicker incentive in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011713C070208

    Original file (20040011713C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 2000, the applicant signed an enlistment contract enlisting in the IRR for 3 years. The applicant completed and signed an enlistment contract dated 10 February 2003 reenlisting in the IRR for 6 years. Army Regulation 140-111 (U. S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program), paragraph 7-4 states when an IRR Soldier is to be processed for immediate reenlistment, USAHRC – STL will send the Soldier a partially completed DD Form 4-series, a DA Form 3540, and a detailed letter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075315C070403

    Original file (2002075315C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his erroneous enlistment extension of 27 November 1999 be voided; that he be authorized an antedated 3-year enlistment in the Army Reserve (USAR) dated 1 April 1999; that he be honorably discharged from the Army National Guard (ARNG) effective 31 March 1999 and that he be issued the appropriate separation documents from the ARNG; and that he be authorized an antedated reenlistment dated 31 March 2002 for a term of service which he will decide when he reenlists. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086539C070212

    Original file (2003086539C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her reenlistment documents be corrected to show she enlisted in the Army Reserve on 4 May 2000 vice 4 March 2000. Paragraph 11-8 states that the effective date of a reserve component enlistment is the day after discharge from the Regular Army. The Board accepts the 99th Regional Support Command memorandum as sufficient evidence to show she enlisted in the Army Reserve on 4 May 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068472C070402

    Original file (2002068472C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the QMP Board barred the applicant from further reenlistment in the USAR AGR program. Records show that a Department of the Army QMP Board considered the applicant's OMPF and determined that he should be barred from further reenlistment in the USAR AGR program. Therefore, the Board determined that the applicant's records along with his appeal should be reconsidered by the AR-PERSCOM QMP Appeals Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069024C070402

    Original file (2002069024C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 40-501, paragraph 8-19c(4) states that all members of the Ready Reserve not on active duty will be examined at least once every 5 years during the anniversary month of their last recorded medical examination. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: There is no evidence in the medical documents the applicant provided to show that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071010C070402

    Original file (2002071010C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The recommendation contained in the ARPERSCOM advisory opinion is that the applicant be granted de facto status for the periods 1 December 1999 through 28 December 2001. The evidence of record confirms that although the applicant technically failed to comply with the two year promotion service remaining requirement within 30 days of the effective date of his promotion, this was more the result of administrative processing errors rather than a reflection of the applicant’s intent not to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076779C070215

    Original file (2002076779C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the obligated period of service, the soldier will not apply for voluntary nondisability retirement unless the soldier is (a) eligible for retirement by completion 30 years or more active Federal service and (b) already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at retirement and (c) over 58 years of age. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003959

    Original file (20090003959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With prior enlisted service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for a period of 3 years on 29 October 2000. On 19 September 2003, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (now known as HRC), St. Louis, MO, published Orders R-10-006604A01 extending the applicant's AGR duty from 3 years with a release from active duty (REFRAD) date of 4 November 2003, to 5 years, 9 months, and 3 days with a REFRAD date of 7 August 2006. On 7 December 2006, HRC published...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077997C070215

    Original file (2002077997C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: In his next NCOER covering the period from October 1999 through February 2000, he received the same ratings and the supporting comments indicate he failed to put mission above personal affairs, has had lots of unaccountable time, he failed to take a APFT despite numerous opportunities to do so, has not gained in...