| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Shirley L. Powell | Member | ||
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
2. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.
3. The applicant states, in effect, that he did not return his selection form, but transfer to the Retired Reserve was his intent. He claims that he wanted to receive his “20 Year Letter” and also to be available for call-up in an emergency. He also states that he wanted to protect his family’s benefits. He claims that his failure to return the option election form was an oversight, and he was unaware that not returning the form would result in his discharge. He claims that he believed that he had been retired and did not realize that he had been in fact discharged until he reviewed his records in 1994.
4. The applicant’s military records show that on 5 June 1965, he was commissioned a second lieutenant (2LT) in the USAR. He completed over 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay prior to being discharged from the USAR in the rank and pay grade of lieutenant colonel/0-5 (LTC/0-5) on 9 August 1993.
5. The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge processing are not on file. However, a Reserve Personnel Accounting System (RPAS) statement obtained from the Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) verifies that the applicant was issued a “20 Year Letter” on
21 January 1991, which confirmed he had completed the required years of service necessary to qualify for retired pay at age 60. This document also confirms that on 9 August 1993, he was involuntarily discharged from the USAR based on his having reached his maximum authorized years of service. The RPAS statement also confirms that at the time of his discharge, he had completed 22 years of creditable service for Reserve retirement.
6. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for the separation of USAR officers. Chapter 4 contains criteria for discharge and paragraph 4-4 provides guidance and the reasons that mandate the removal of a member of the USAR from an active status. It states in pertinent part, that members of the USAR will be removed from an active status for any of 18 listed reasons. It also indicates that removal will be by discharge; however, it does provide the option for eligible members to apply for transfer to the Retired Reserve in lieu of discharge.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Lacking evidence to the contrary, the Board presumes that the applicant’s honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with the applicable law and regulation in effect at the time.
2. However, the Board also finds it reasonable to conclude that if the applicant had properly understood that he was not being transferred to the Retired Reserve and that his discharge would be automatic if he failed to return his option election form, he would have responded in a timely manner. Further, the Board has no reason to doubt the applicant’s claim that it was always his intent to transfer to the Retired Reserve upon his mandatory removal from an active USAR status.
3. The Board takes special note of the fact that the applicant’s USAR discharge was based on something other than medical unfitness, and his electing transfer to the Retired Reserve would likely subject him to recall while only providing him benefits to which he is already entitled based on his years of qualifying service for retirement. Thus, the Board finds it reasonable and appropriate to grant the requested relief as a matter of equity in the best interest of the applicant and the Army.
4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by voiding the 9 August 1993 discharge from the USAR pertaining to the individual concerned, and by showing that he was instead transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date.
BOARD VOTE:
__JM__ __SLP___ __SAC_ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ______ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ _______DENY APPLICATION
Samuel A. Crumpler
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003086241 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/06/DD |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1993/08/09 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 135-155 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Max Yrs of Svc |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 338 | 136.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089841C070403
On 26 July 2001, the applicant was notified that a Department of the Army AGR QMP Board convened on 27 April 2001 and, after a comprehensive review of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), it denied him continued service. A DA Form 1506 prepared on 8 July 2002, by Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) officials shows that the applicant completed a total of 11 years, 2 months, and 13 days of active military service and 18 years, 5 months, and 1 day of military service. However,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077049C070215
Chapter 7 of that regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 6 June 2002 and assigning him to the Retired...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082034C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he be transferred to the USAR Retired Reserve. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge from the USAR was unjust for the following reasons: he responded to the option letter provided him prior to the effective date of his discharge; his intent to enter the Retired Reserve was clearly established in his response to this option letter; he was not given...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058033C070420
The applicant states that he was discharged from the USAR Control Group on 16 April 1992 as a result of his response to a card offering him the option to be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant's discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089368C070403
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted retirement points for the years 1993 through 2003. The evidence of record also confirms that the applicant completed 22 years of qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement purposes. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075786C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be reappointed as a major in the Army Reserve (USAR) to obtain four additional qualifying years of service for retirement at age 60. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066238C070421
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he applied for retired pay. The evidence of record shows the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP during an Open Season but then failed to apply for retired pay in a timely manner, preventing the applicant from receiving the SBP annuity when he died. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the FSM applied for retired pay on 1 September...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091194C070212
The applicant's military personnel records were not available to the Board. The ARPERSCOM advisory opinion points out that the applicant requested retirement point credit service performed between the effective date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve, 9 October 1996, and the date when his official orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve were actually published, 29 August 1997. At this time, the applicant was given the option of accepting separation pay or changing the effective...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003080111C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, waiver of his military education requirement for promotion to major and appearance before a Special Selection Board (SSB). The evidence of record shows the applicant completed all requirements for his baccalaureate degree four months prior to the March 2001 RCSB; however, Excelsior University failed to confer the applicant's degree prior to the convening date of the March 2001 RCSB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076641C070215
It indicated, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of application for retired pay, but must have (1) attained age 60; (2) completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service; and, (3) served the last 8-years of his or her qualifying service as a Reserve Component soldier. He was allowed two additional years to obtain one additional year of qualifying service until his transfer to the Retired Reserve effective 24...