Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086183C070212
Original file (2003086183C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 28 October 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086183

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Antoinette Farley Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member
Ms. Marla J. Troup Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from 4 to 3.

APPLICANT STATES: That he would like to reenlist. He has been out of the Army for a little over two years. He received an honorable discharge, but his reenlistment code bars him from rejoining. Since he has been out of the service, he has successfully held a full-time job and attended school full time. He therefore would like to continue his success in the Army. He submits two reference letters issued to him from his Army supervisors prior to his separation from the service. His civilian shift supervisor commended him for being a team player, a kind and sincere individual, and an ideal worker. She recommended him for whatever position he decided to take up next. His company commander had found him to be competent and a great job performer. He was responsible when given a task to accomplish.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 1999 for 4 years. He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 74B10 (Information System Operator Analyst).

The applicant's discharge packet is not available.

On 10 November 2001, the applicant was honorably discharged, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. He was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of JPD (separation for alcohol rehabilitation failure under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9) and an RE Code, RE- 4.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.
A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE- 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table states that, when the SPD is JPD, then RE- 4 will be given.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was discharged as an alcohol rehabilitation failure. Due to the reason for his discharge, he was properly given an RE- 4.

2. The Board took into consideration the applicant’s references and commends him for his claimed accomplishments. Unfortunately, the RE-4 is not waivable. Post service accomplishments alone do not provide the Board a basis upon which to grant relief.

3. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___RJW_ ___LDS _ ___MJT _ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086183
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031028
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 2001.11.10
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Chap 9 Alcohol Rehab Failure
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY DIRCTOR
ISSUES 1. A100.03
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023042

    Original file (20110023042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the first incident of alcohol rehabilitation was voluntary, which he completed in April 2004 at Fort Riley, KS * due to worries of severe indebtedness, financial, and health issues in 2004, he relapsed and the Army ordered him into the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) * at the time of his discharge in 2005, he had no intention of reenlistment so his RE code is improper based on paragraphs 8-3a and 8-3b of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011922

    Original file (20100011922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter, the military substance abuse counselor stated that on 11 December 2006, the applicant had referred himself to the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) clinic. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. After failing the Army ASAP program which included a 30-day in-patient hospitalization followed by a driving under the influence charge, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017194

    Original file (20070017194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from the Army for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "JPD", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, specifies the narrative reason for discharge as "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure" and that the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9." The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002928

    Original file (20080002928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000159

    Original file (20120000159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006683

    Original file (20140006683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After numerous discussions with behavioral health providers and Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) counselors, it was concluded that there was no other care available on active duty for her situation. On 7 December 2012, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that she be discharged under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 with an honorable discharge. Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012784

    Original file (20080012784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the applicant was honorably discharged on 22 June 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JPD is “Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081006C070215

    Original file (2002081006C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from a "4" to a "3" so that he can enlist in the Army National Guard. The evidence shows that the applicant was a good soldier despite his problems with alcohol; consequently, the Army Discharge Review Board deigned to upgrade his discharge to honorable. Therefore, the applicant's RE code of "4" should be upgraded to "3."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009633

    Original file (20090009633.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the applicant was honorably discharged on 24 March 2005 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015761

    Original file (20090015761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 February 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200, due to alcohol rehabilitation failure with a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals are assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated...