| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. William Blakely | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | ||
| Ms. Lana E. McGlynn | Member | ||
| Mr. William D. Powers | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his military records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was wounded in action on 21 January 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He believes that PH orders were published, but he was medically evacuated prior to an award presentation. In support of his application, he submits copies of the following documents: Disposition Form (DA Form 2496-1), dated 18 May 1967, SUBJECT: Recommendation for Medical Restriction from Flight Duty; Letter request for PH orders, dated 14 August 1989, addressed to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM); Clinical Record (Standard Form 513),dated 27 December 1967; and an ARPERSCOM awards branch letter, dated 17 August 1990.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 31 December 1980, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), for the purpose of retirement, after completing 20 years, 4 months, and 23 days of active military service. The separation document (DD Form 214) issued to him at this time confirms that he held the rank of chief warrant officer four (CW4), and he was serving in primary specialty number 761A (General Supply Technician).
The DD Form 214 also shows that during his active duty tenure, the applicant earned the following awards: Legion of Merit; Meritorious Service Medal; Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster); Air Medal (16th Award); Army Good Conduct Medal; National Defense Service Medal; Vietnam Service Medal with
1 bronze service star; Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 60 Device; and Republic of Vietnam Cross of Gallantry with Palm Unit Citation. The PH is not included in this list of authorized awards.
The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or documents indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH while he was serving in the RVN.
The applicant provides a copy of a Standard Form 513 that shows he was injured in an aircraft accident in the RVN on 21 January 1967. This document confirms that he was treated for an open fracture of the left tibia, as well as a compound would of his left ankle with disruption of posterior ankle capsule without nerve or artery damage. However, the Standard Form 513 contains no indication or confirmation that the aircraft accident was the direct result of enemy action, or that he was entitled to, recommended for, or awarded the PH as a result of these injuries.
In the 17 August 1990 ARPERSCOM awards branch letter, the applicant was informed that a search of the records failed to produce evidence that he was wounded or injured as a direct result of hostile action. It also indicated that accidental injuries received in a combat zone are not considered wounds received in action, and as a result there was no authority to award the applicant the PH.
During the review of this case, the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster was reviewed to determine if the applicant was ever reported as a battle casualty while he was serving in the RVN. His name was not included in this official DA list of RVN casualties. In addition, a member of the Board staff contacted Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) awards officials to determine if the applicant was ever awarded the PH. This inquiry produced a negative result, the applicant’s name is not recorded in the PH database.
Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes the policy for the Army awards program. Paragraph 2-8 contains the policy for awarding the PH, and it states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to receive the PH for the injuries he received in an aircraft accident while serving in the RVN. However, it finds an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the requested relief.
2. By regulation, the PH is authorized for personnel who are wounded or injured as a direct result of enemy action. The evidence of record gives no indication that the aircraft accident that resulted in the applicant’s injuries was the direct result of hostile action. Further, neither the DA Vietnam Casualty Roster or PERSCOM records indicate that the applicant was categorized as a combat casualty during his service in the RVN, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH.
4. The evidence of record does confirm that the applicant was injured in an aircraft accident in the RVN that was not a direct result of enemy action. As a result, the Board finds that the regulatory criteria required to support award of the PH has not been met in this case. Thus, it is compelled to deny the applicant’s request for the PH in the interest of all those who served in the RVN and who faced similar circumstances.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
JS____ __WDP___ __LEM__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003086165 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 61 | 107.0015 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084980C070212
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was injured in a helicopter accident on 2 December 1967, while serving as a door gunner in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is authorized to members who are wounded in action. While the applicant has provided evidence, in the form of a summary of his military medical record prepared by the VA, that verifies that he was hospitalized in the RVN for injuries he received in a helicopter accident, he failed to provide...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080747C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In this case, notwithstanding the medical treatment record provided by the applicant and the record confirmation that he was injured in an aircraft accident while serving in the RVN, there are no other official...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076514C070215
Department of the Army General Order Number 8, issued in 1974, authorized the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to United States Army Vietnam or Military Assistance Command Vietnam and its subordinate units from 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973. Lacking any derogatory information on file in the applicant’s record or a specific disqualifying action from any of his active duty unit commanders, the Board concludes that he served...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231
Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009703C070205
It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. However, by regulation in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Further, Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and Item 41 does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005166
Item 40 (Wounds) of this form would have listed any combat injuries and the date. These are: a. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 22 April 1966, shows he was admitted to the 106th General Hospital on 19 March 1966 after being transferred from the 85th Evacuation Hospital due to vertigo, caused by a blast and deafness in both ears. Therefore, regrettably, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009917C070208
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart and correction of his separation document (DD Form 214) to show the Soldier’s Medal. The regulation provides that, although multiple awards of this unit citation are not authorized for wear, official military and historical records will indicate all awards received.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007936C070206
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 16 August 1970 through 15 August 1971. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Army Commendation Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000595
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record and accidents not . Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013208
However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In addition, there are no medical treatment records on file confirming he was ever treated for a combat related wound or injury, and his...