| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ernest W. Lutz | Member | |
| Mr. Larry C. Bergquist | Member |
2. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.
3. The applicant states that he got hit by a piece of shrapnel from incoming mortar rounds in Vietnam. He also contends that a medic wrapped his arm with a bandage. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge); a letter, dated 25 February 2003, from a Member of Congress; two newspaper articles; and a letter, dated 20 January 2003.
4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted on 17 September 1968 for a period of 3 years. He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to Company C and Company E, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry of the 11th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam from 9 February 1969 through 8 February 1970. On 18 June 1970, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days of creditable service with no lost time.
5. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal as authorized awards.
6. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
7. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.
8. The applicant underwent a separation physical examination on 2 June 1970 which makes no mention of any wounds or injuries sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
9. In support of his claim, the applicant provided two newspaper articles describing combat actions of Company C, 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry of the 11th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam. However, these articles do not show that the applicant was wounded in action.
10. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.
11. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant's unit is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 2, dated 1971.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
13. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he got hit by a piece of shrapnel from incoming mortar rounds in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
2. Considering the applicant attained the rank of specialist four in less than
2 years, the Board concludes the applicant met eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 September 1968 through
18 June 1970 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.
3. The applicant's unit received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, this unit award should also be added to his DD Form 214.
4. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records but only as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 September 1968 through 18 June 1970.
2. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to show award of the Good Conduct Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
3. That so much of the application as pertains to award of the Purple Heart be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
CLG___ EWL____ LCB_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
_Curtis L. Greenway___
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2003086049 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031030 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.0015 |
| 2. | 107.0000 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068828C070402
Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the periods 24 August - 31 December 1969 and 31 March - 30 June 1970. The applicant was awarded two awards of the Army Commendation Medal -- one for service and one for heroism. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with automatic rifle bar, the Expert...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010196
This pamphlet shows the 23rd Administration Company was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 53, dated 1970, for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the time of the applicant's assignment. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020338
The available evidence shows the applicant served honorably from 9 August 1967 to 9 June 1969 and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 5...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000727C070206
Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of: a. the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device; b. the Combat Infantryman Badge; c. the first award of the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 2 January 1969 to 25 May 1970; and, d. the Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004688
Army Regulation 600-8-22 authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029847
His DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1970 shows he was awarded the following: * National Defense Service Medal * Purple Heart * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) 9. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 6 March 1968 through 26 February 1970 and his record should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004887C070208
The applicant submitted a copy of medical records from the DVA which shows that he was granted a service connected rating of 0 percent for residuals of shrapnel injury to the left anterior thigh effective 10 April 2003. The applicant is entitled to the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 14 March 1968 to 18 December 1969 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007313
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant provides: * a Purple Heart Certificate, dated 16 September 1969, wherein it shows he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 18 August 1969 * an Army Commendation Medal Citation, undated, wherein it shows he was presented the Army Commendation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082215C070215
However, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received a third wound that resulted from hostile action. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Vietnam during three campaigns entitling him to wear three bronze service stars with the Vietnam Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the second award of the Purple Heart for wounds received on 14 March 1968 and the Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091256C070212
Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 20 April 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 19 April 1973. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: