Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086014C070212
Original file (2003086014C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


                  IN THE CASE OF:
        


                  BOARD DATE: 7 October 2003
                  DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003086014

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Ms. Shirley Powell Member
Mr. Robert Duecaster Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his permanent "2" profile under upper extremities be changed to "3."

APPLICANT STATES: That he believes the injuries sustained during his active duty service were imminent and they have interfered with his current work and daily life. In support of his application, he submits a copy of DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 13 January 2000.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted on 29 July 1997 for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training in military occupational specialty 92Y (unit supply specialist).

The applicant's service personnel records show that he fractured his right elbow on 7 May 1999 while playing basketball. He was issued a permanent "2" profile under upper extremities by competent medical authorities (i.e. the brigade surgeon and the division surgeon) on 13 January 2000 for a right elbow fracture.

On 28 July 2000, the applicant was released from active duty for completion of required active service.

There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant's permanent "2" profile under upper extremities was amended or reviewed by a physical profile board prior to his release from active duty.

Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted. Four numerical designations (1-4) are used to reflect different levels of functional capacity in six factors (PULHES): P-physical capacity or stamina, U-upper extremities, L-lower extremities, H-hearing and ears, E-eyes, and S-psychiatric. Numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment. Numerical designators "2" and "3" indicate that an individual has a medical condition or physical defect which requires certain restrictions in assignment within which the individual is physically capable of performing military duty.

Army Regulation 40-501 also states, in pertinent part, that a permanent profile may only be awarded or changed by an authorized profiling officer and that changing from or to a permanent numerical designator "3" or "4" requires a physical profile board.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. The Board considered the applicant's request that his permanent "2" profile under upper extremities be changed to "3." However, the applicant has provided no evidence to show that this profile was unjust or in error.

3. On 13 January 2000, the applicant was issued a permanent "2" profile under upper extremities by competent medical authorities. There is no evidence that his permanent "2" profile was amended or reviewed by a physical profile board prior to his release from active duty. Therefore, the Board determined that there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

FNE____ SP______ RD______ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003086014
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20031007
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 108.0100
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006988

    Original file (20100006988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her military records be corrected to show her injuries to her ankles, right shoulder, back, right elbow, and right knee were incurred in the line of duty. The profile referred the applicant to a Non-Duty Related Physical Evaluation Board (NDR-PEB). c. Army Regulation 635-40 states, in pertinent part, that when a commander or other proper authority believes that a Soldier not on extended active duty is unable to perform the duties of his or her grade or rank because...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017608

    Original file (20080017608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. A temporary profile is given if the condition is considered temporary, the correction or treatment of the condition is medically advisable, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006557

    Original file (20090006557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007125

    Original file (20140007125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show something other than condition, not a disability. At this time, the applicant desired to pursue separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17, other physical conditions. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009896

    Original file (20080009896.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests, in effect, the applicant’s records be corrected by rescinding his discharge from the Illinois Army National Guard (ILARNG), by paying him all back pay and allowances from the date of discharge to present, and by referring him to the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) for evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The ILARNG State Surgeon, on 14 March 2006, issued the applicant a permanent physical profile of L4, found him unfit for retention, and stated he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016931

    Original file (20130016931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Service medical records * VA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical fitness), chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) provides that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075297C070403

    Original file (2002075297C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 7-8f of the same regulation states the physical profiles for Reservist not on active duty may be accomplished by the Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) staff surgeons, medical corps commander of USAR hospitals, or the Surgeon, AR-PERSCOM without a physical profile board (PPBD). Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. It states that soldiers when found...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018262

    Original file (20080018262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a medical retirement. Evidence of record shows the applicant’s physical profile at the time of his retirement on 30 November 1991 was 111211. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant was eligible for physical disability processing and there is no basis for a medical retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021573

    Original file (20100021573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge, or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. Although she received numerous temporary physical profiles due to her knee, there is no evidence she was determined to be unable to perform the duties of her rank or MOS. Her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016469

    Original file (20100016469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing, and if reclassification action is warranted. However, evidence of record shows he was found to be medically...