| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Wanda L. Waller | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | Member | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That her discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to general.
APPLICANT STATES: The applicant did not provide an explanation. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); discharge orders from the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG), dated 5 October 2001; an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the NJARNG; and her enlistment contract with the Pennsylvania Air National Guard, dated 6 July 2001.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 13 August 1980 under the delayed entry program. She entered active duty on 2 July 1981, trained as a medical specialist and extended her three-year enlistment on 7 April 1983 for an additional 23 months. The applicant was promoted to sergeant effective
1 February 1985 and was honorably discharged on 4 December 1985 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment. She reenlisted on 5 December 1985 for a period of 6 years.
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not contained in the available records. However, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) proceedings indicate that charges were preferred against the applicant for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 16 May 1987 to 3 September 1987.
On 9 September 1987, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. She waived a separation physical examination and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.
On 21 September 1987, the intermediate commander recommended that the applicant’s request for discharge be approved and that she be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
On 23 September 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that she be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 7 October 1987 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. She had served 5 years, 11 months and 19 days of total active service with 110 days of lost time due to AWOL.
The ADRB denied the applicant's requests to upgrade her discharge on
12 October 1988 and on 27 October 1997.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The Board noted the applicant's honorable service in the NJARNG following her discharge from the Army and her current status in the Pennsylvania Air National Guard. However, good post service conduct alone is not a basis for upgrading a discharge.
3. The Board noted that the applicant had served almost six years of military service at the time of her discharge. However, the Board also noted that the applicant was a sergeant and knew, or should have known, that there were other options available to her than to go AWOL.
4. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.
5. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
FNE____ MVT_____ JTM_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003085986 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20030819 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19871007 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 Chapter 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | For the good of the service |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.0200 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014116
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The appropriate authority approved her request for discharge on 21 September 1987 and directed her discharge under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, on 3 November 1987, she was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007949
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of her under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. On 21 September 1987, the separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial, and that she receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009953
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to either an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge and amendment of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) accordingly. The applicant provides VA documents that show his service from 1 May 1985 to 24 May 1988 was not listed as "honorable" and a decision would have to be made by the VA that his service was not "dishonorable" to make him eligible for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018325
On 13 January 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service in accordance with chapter 10 of Army regulation 635-200 and directed she receive an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate and be reduced to private/E-1. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time of her discharge shows that she was discharged for the good of the service with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions character of service. Furthermore,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011174
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that her discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. On 26 January 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that she be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014135
The applicant states that: a. his initial enlistment in the New Jersey Army National Guard (NJARNG) was erroneous and therefore he should have been separated under the chapter for Defective Enlistment instead of the chapter for Entry Level Performance and Conduct; b. his separation code "JGA" corresponds to separation of a pregnant Soldier and should be changed to the correct code; and c. he completed the Army Junior Reserve Officer's Training Corps (JROTC) and was recommended for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006907
The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 8 May 1987, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate be issued and that the applicant be reduced to pay grade E-1. Based on the available evidence, there is no basis for the upgrade of his discharge to either a fully honorable or a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014517
On 13 March 1987, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. On 12 May 1987, the applicant was discharged accordingly. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018662
The applicant requests that her discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. The appropriate authority approved her request on 27 April 1987 and directed that the applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions. The applicant offered no mitigating circumstances to explain her absence at the time she was apprehended or when she submitted her request for discharge and her explanation to the Board is not supported by either the evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001786
However, about 10 September 1986, he was told he had 5 days to out-process for an overseas assignment. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged by reason of for the good of the service - in lieu of court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was advised by the unit XO that his enlistment contract...