Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085469C070212
Original file (2003085469C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 13 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003085469

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Margaret K. Patterson Chairperson
Mr. Ted S. Kanamine Member
Mr. Lawrence Foster Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show he entered the Army on 21 July 1970 vice
28 September 1970, which is currently shown.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the active duty entry date of 28 September 1970 recorded in his DD Form 214 is incorrect. He claims that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) shows a documented military entrance examination on
21 July 1970, when he entered the service at Ashland, Kentucky. He requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to show this date.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 4) on file in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), which was authenticated by the applicant with his signature in Item 55 (Statement of Enlistment), confirms that he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for two years and entered active duty on 28 September 1970.

Special Orders Number 189, dated 28 September 1970, issued by the Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station, Ashland, Kentucky, also confirm that the effective date of his enlistment was 28 September 1970.

The applicant’s Enlistment Qualification Record (DA Form 20), which was prepared on him upon his entry on active duty confirms, in Item 16 (Service Dates), that his Basic Active Service Date (BASD) and Basic Pay Entry Date (BPED) were established as 28 September 1970. The applicant signed this document in Item 47 (Signature of Individual), thereby confirming that the information contained in the record was correct when the record was prepared. This includes the BASD and BPED recorded in the DA Form 20.

On 16 December 1970, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of not meeting medical fitness standards at the time of his enlistment. The DD Form 214 issued to him on the date of his discharge confirms that he entered active duty on 28 September 1970. It also verifies that as of the date of his discharge, he had completed a total of 2 months and 18 days of active military service. The applicant authenticated this separation document in Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged), thereby verifying that the information contained in the separation document was correct at the time it was prepared and issued.

Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. Chapter 2 contains item by item guidance and instructions for DD Form 214 entries.
The specific instructions contained in the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s discharge specified that the entry in Item 17c (Date of Entry) would be the date the member entered active duty. The source documents used for this entry were the DD Form 4 and DA Form 20.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that the date he entered active duty recorded in his DD Form 214 is incorrect. However, it finds insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2. The enlistment contract on file in the applicant’s OMPF confirms that he enlisted in the RA and entered active duty on 28 September 1970. The Enlisted Qualification Record that was prepared on him upon his entry on active duty also confirms that his BASD and BPED were established as 28 September 1970. The applicant signed this DA Form 20 verifying that the information contained therein was correct at the time the record was prepared.

3. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 16 December 1970, the date of his discharge, also confirms in Item 17c (Date of Entry) that he entered active duty on 28 September 1970. The applicant authenticated this document with his signature on the date it was prepared and issued, thereby verifying that the information contained in this properly constituted separation document was correct at that time.

4. The applicant is advised that Military Entrance Station processing does not automatically translate into an enlistment date that entitles one to service credit. The date a member actually enters active duty as documented in the enlistment contract and accompanying orders is the date recorded in a DD Form 214, and is the date from which active duty service credit begins.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___TK___ ___LF___ __MP____ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003085469
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/05/13
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1970/12/16
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Not Meet Entrance Physical Standards.
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 3 100.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000351

    Original file (20150000351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000351 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered active duty on 1 December 1965, vice 1 December 1955. The applicant's military record contains the following documents: a. DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record - Armed Forces of the United States) showing he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019946

    Original file (20080019946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of entry be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show that he entered active duty on 17 July 1968 rather than 18 July 1968. The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States) shows he entered his initial enlistment in the Regular Army on 18 July 1968 for a period of three years. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted on 18 July 1968 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008010

    Original file (20080008010.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, U.S. Army Reception Station, Fort Polk, Louisiana Special Orders Number 58, dated 18 March 1966, lists the applicant and identifies him with an ETS (expiration of term of service) of 14 March 1969, a BPED (Basic Pay Entry Date) of 15 March 1966, and an ADC (active duty commitment) of 36 months. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012191

    Original file (20080012191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that his DD Form 214 shows he separated a day before he entered active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 17c on his DD Form 214 to show his date of entry as 11 December 1964.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001959

    Original file (20070001959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that this correction resulted in the applicant being credited with 2 additional days of active service based on his active duty training service during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. Thus, the applicant provides evidence to substantiate his claim that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 1991, does not reflect credit for the 2 days of active duty training during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. However, the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012186C080407

    Original file (20070012186C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 30 June 1968, the date of his retirement, confirms in Item 22 that the applicant completed 1 year, 6 months and 20 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (11 December 1966-30 June 1968), 20 years and 28 days of prior active service and a total of 21 years, 7 months and 18 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027416

    Original file (20100027416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States) prepared during his enlistment process. The instructions for completing Item 15 states to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of the DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The applicant's OMPF does not contain any documents and he did not provide any documents that shows a date of entry on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009803

    Original file (20090009803.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry date listed in item 17c (Date of Entry) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he entered military service in August 1966 vice 10 June 1964, as is currently shown. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and entered active duty on 10 June 1966, and not 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005434C070206

    Original file (20050005434C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 16c (Date of Entry) and Item 30 (Remarks) of his 23 September 1971 separation document (DD Form 214). He also states that his total active service dates are incorrect as a result of an erroneous entry in Item 30 of the DD Form 214 that shows he was on excess leave for 12 days from 21 July through 1 August 1970. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of his entry date into the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001176

    Original file (20150001176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted into the DEP in October 1971 and his DD Form 214 does not reflect this time. He enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 18 April 1972 and his DD Form 214 correctly shows this. Accordingly, his DEP time is properly depicted on his DD Form 214; therefore, there is no basis to change his DD Form 214 and there is no basis to grant his requested relief.