| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Hubert O. Fry | Member | |
| Ms. Marla J. Troup | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that in 1976 everyone who had problems during Vietnam was given amnesty. He claims that he inquired about this and he qualified. However, after completing the initial paperwork, he did not follow-up. He states that he entered the Army at age 17, and he was not an adult. He claims that he made some bad decisions for which he is truly remorseful. He claims that since his discharge he has been a law abiding and productive citizen.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 26 July 1965, he enlisted in the Regular Army for four years. He successfully completed basic training at Fort Ord, California. The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he was promoted to private first class/E-3 (PFC/E-3) on 26 April 1966, and this was the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.
The applicant’s record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement or service warranting special recognition. However, it does reveal an extensive disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on two separate occasions. The record also shows that the applicant was tried and convicted by special court-martial on two separate occasions. Further, it indicates that he accrued 474 days of time lost due to being absent without leave (AWOL) and/or in confinement.
The specific facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not on file. However, a properly constituted separation document (DD Form 214), which contains the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge is available.
The separation document confirms that at the time of his discharge, the applicant had completed a total of 1 year, 8 months, and 12 days of creditable active military service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s separation document is blank and shows that he earned no awards or decorations during his tenure on active duty.
The DD Form 214 also confirms that the applicant was discharged with an
UD on 6 August 1968. Item 11c (Reason and Authority for Separation) contains an entry that verifies that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, by reason of unfitness. Item 55 (Remarks) also contains an entry that verifies that the applicant accrued 474 days of lost time during his active duty tenure.
Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority, established the policy, and prescribed the procedures for separating members for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate for members separating under these provisions.
In Presidential Proclamation Number (PP #) 4313, dated 16 September 1974, the President announced a clemency program designed to provide deserters an opportunity to work their way back into American society. This proclamation pertained to all individuals who were carried administratively as deserters if their last period of AWOL was between 4 August 1964 and 28 March 1973. Under this program, eligible enlisted deserters were offered the opportunity to request an undesirable discharge for the good of the service if they agreed to perform alternate service under the supervision of the Selective Service System. Successful completion of alternate service entitled a participant to receive a Clemency Discharge Certificate.
Clemency Discharges issued pursuant to PP # 4313 did not impact the underlying discharge a member received and did not entitle the individual to any benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Army Discharge Review Board adapted the policy that a Clemency Discharge would be considered by a board in its deliberations but that the discharge per se did not automatically require relief be granted.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that his discharge should be upgraded because everyone who had problems during Vietnam were given amnesty. However, the Board finds this factor provides an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the requested relief.
2. Clemency Discharges issued pursuant to PP # 4313 were normally issued after a member had completed alternate service under the supervision of the Selective Service System. Further, these discharges did not impact the underlying discharge a member received and did not entitle the individual to any benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs.
3. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated for unfitness based on an extensive history of misconduct. The Board is satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, it finds that the character of the applicant’s discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
4. The evidence provided also provides no indication that the applicant ever satisfied the requirements necessary to receive a clemency discharge under the provisions of PP # 4313. Therefore, the Board concludes that the requested relief is not warranted in this case.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__FE__ __HOF___ __MT___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003085427 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/06/17 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1968/08/06 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-212 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Unfitness |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 189 | 110.0000 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013037
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It also shows he completed a total of 1 year, 2 months, and 1 day of creditable active military service and that he received a UD. Further, given this extensive disciplinary history, the fact he completed alternate service and received a clemency discharge under the provisions of PP 4313 is still not sufficiently mitigating to support an upgrade of his discharge at this late date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102662C070208
The applicant states that everyone, even the President was granted amnesty, and as such his discharge is in error or unjust. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was 17 years old when he enlisted in the United States Army on 20 May 1971. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009899
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 that was issued to him at the time of his discharge shows that he received an undesirable discharge, and that he agreed to perform 4 months of alternate service pursuant to PP 4313. However, his completion of alternate service pursuant to PP 4313 was already the sole basis for upgrading his undesirable discharge to a clemency discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003046
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. He was discharged on 29 June 1953 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge under conditions other than honorable. However, while draft evaders and deserters who were processed for separation under PP 4313 would have been entitled to receive a Clemency Discharge if they satisfactorily completed the alternate service satisfactorily, the Clemency Discharge did not affect the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005792
His record shows that during this enlistment, the applicant served in the RVN from 6 June 1966 through 8 January 1968. The Army Discharge Review Board adopted the policy that a clemency discharge would be considered by a board in its deliberations, but that the discharge per se did not automatically require relief be granted. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was terminated from the reconciliation service program based on his failure to complete the required alternate service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060952C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was given a second chance to redeem himself and complete his service obligation to his country through alternate service pursuant to the provisions of PP # 4313.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | AR20070003716C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge under the Presidential Proclamation. There is also no evidence in the available record that show that he ever completed alternate service; that he was ever granted a presidential pardon; or that he was ever awarded a clemency discharge in accordance with the Presidential Proclamation. 360 |144.0000/ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE | |2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014410
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060014410 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. There is no evidence in the available records and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009295
The applicant's military records show he initially enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 23 October 1959. The applicant's MPRJ contains a Selective Service System letter dated 18 August 1976, which confirms he completed the assigned period of alternate service in the Reconciliation Service Program entitling him to consideration of a Clemency Discharge. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under honorable conditions nor under other than honorable conditions. It...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015364C071029
Clemency Discharges issued pursuant to PP # 4313 did not impact the underlying discharge a member received and did not entitle the individual to any benefits administered by the VA. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge was considered by this Board on its merits during its 2 May 2006 review of the applicant's case. Only after the Board determined the applicant's overall record of service was not sufficiently meritorious to support...