| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Vic Whitney | Analyst |
| Mr. John N. Slone | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Mark D. Manning | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests a change in the character of his service at the time of his discharge.
2. The applicant states that he had 225 days of lost time and his reentry code was just. He does not feel that the character of his service is just and this type of discharge would not be issued today.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice, which occurred on 9 January 1974, the date of his discharge. The application submitted in this case is postmarked 6 January 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. In complying with this decision, the ABCMR has adopted the broader policy of calculating the 3-year time limit from the date of exhaustion in any case where a lower level administrative remedy is utilized.
3. The applicant enlisted and entered active duty on 31 August 1971. He completed training as an infantryman and was assigned to Germany. He was promoted to pay grade E-3 effective 28 January 1972.
4. Between 2 June and 26 December 1972 the applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) for 30 days. Effective 22 March 1973, the applicant was granted 23 days emergency leave due to the illness of his father. Between 14 April and 17 October 1973 he was AWOL for 157 days. On 18 October 1973 he was apprehended by civil authorities and returned to military control.
5. On 2 November 1973, charges were preferred for the 157 days AWOL. On 5 December 1973, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request acknowledged that he might receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions and might be deprived of many or all Army and veteran's benefits. In a statement in his own behalf he wrote that he went AWOL because of family problems and that the Army made his problems worse. He violently wanted out of the Army.
6. On 21 December the separation authority, a major general, approved his request and directed separation in the pay grade of E-1 with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
7. Effective 9 January 1974, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 10-1. His lost time is recorded as 225 days and his creditable service as 1 year, 10 months, and 5 days.
8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
9. On 15 April 1981 the Army Discharge Review Board, in a unanimous vote, denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. That board determined that his discharge was both proper and equitable based on a review of all the facts of the case.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the offenses he was charged with.
2. The applicant chose to request an administrative discharge rather than risk the consequences of a court-martial. Current standards do not change the separations authority's ability to issue a discharge under other than honorable conditions for lengthy periods of AWOL.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. Records show that the applicant should have discovered the injustice now under consideration on 15 April 1981, the date of his denial by the Army Discharge Review Board. Thus, the applicant should have filed an application with the ABCMR within 3 years from 15 April 1981. However, the applicant did not do so and has not provided a compelling explanation justifying failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__js___ ___be___ __mm___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003085216 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20031118 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19740109 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A71.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.02 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021791
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He acknowledged he understood if his discharge request were approved he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. He was charged with being AWOL for a period of 190 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018091
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request were approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. A review of his record shows he repeatedly went AWOL and he had almost 8 months of lost time due to being AWOL or in confinement at the time of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068421C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Information available to the Board indicates that the applicant’s original petition to the Board was denied on 12 February 1975. A 17 January 1973 clinical record prepared at Kimbrough Army Hospital at Fort Meade, Maryland, shows that the applicant was admitted to the hospital on 17 December 1972 and discharged from that hospital on 20 December 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002296C070206
On 7 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice to this Board expired on 6 August 1984.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021243
The applicant requests, in effect, his undesirable discharge (dated 20 November 1974) and discharge under other than honorable conditions (dated 16 September 1981) be upgraded to a general discharge. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090010900 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011420
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 30 November 1981, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions. ___Ted Kanamine_____ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20060011420 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20070227 TYPE OF DISCHARGE UOTHC DATE OF DISCHARGE 19811218 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200 Chapter 10 DISCHARGE REASON For the good of the service, in lieu of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015410C071029
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant also states that his attorney during the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) hearing misled him by telling him he would receive a general discharge within 90 days. On 4 December 1973, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635- 200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009538
The applicant's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he entered active duty this period on 21 August 1973 and he was discharged on 13 November 1975 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 April 1976, the applicant submitted an application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007925C070205
The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on filing to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) should commence on the date of final action by the ADRB. He was discharged pursuant to sentence of a special...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007318C071029
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 21 May 1974, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge and a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 12 October 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgraded discharge.