Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084907C070212
Original file (2003084907C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 20 May 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003084907

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Nancy L. Amos Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Chairperson
Ms. Deborah S. Jacobs Member
Mr. Jose A. Martinez Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Payment of three of his student loans in the approximate amount of $18,000.00.

APPLICANT STATES: That the applications for these loans say "education loan" and "promissory note" and he is receiving student loan interest statements. He does not understand how the Army can say these are not student loans. His loans were approved by his recruiters and Military Entrance Processing Station personnel before he left for basic training.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He entered the Delayed Enlistment Program on 6 July 2001. His DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding, United States Army Incentive Enlistment Program) shows that he enlisted for the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) for an amount not to exceed $65,000. On this form, he acknowledged that under the LRP the Government would repay a designated portion of any loan he incurred that was made, insured or guaranteed under Part B of the Higher Education Act of 1965 or any loan under Part E of such act after 1 October 1975 and before he enlisted into the Regular Army.

The applicant's DA Form 3286-59 (Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, U. S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program) shows that he presented to enlistment officials, among other documents, "promissory notes."

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 January 2002. Prior to entry on active duty he had obtained a Wells Fargo Collegiate Loan in the amount of $3,000.00 (loan holder Wells Fargo Education Financial Services); a Wells Fargo Education Connection Loan (loan holder Servus Financial) in the amount of about $5,170.00; and a Wells Fargo Education Connection Loan (loan holder Servus Financial) in the amount of about $10,135.00.

The applicant apparently had obtained another loan or two (the U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), Education Incentives and Counseling Branch stated that he had a consolidated loan) which were eligible for repayment under the LRP in the amount of $33,822.06.

By letters dated 19 November 2002 and 10 December 2002, respectively, PERSCOM notified the applicant that information received from Servus Financial and Wells Fargo Education Financial Services indicated that his loans from these institutions, were not made, insured, or guaranteed under Title IV Part B, D, or E of the Higher Education Act. He was informed these loans therefore did not qualify for repayment under the LRP.


The Loan Repayment Program is a Department of the Army enlistment option authorized by Public Law 99-145. This option is designed to increase Test Score Category I-IIIA accessions. Loans that qualify for repayment are Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students, Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS), and consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Before entering active duty, the loan must not be in default. The borrower is responsible for obtaining a deferment/forbearance with the loan holder and the loan must remain in good standing throughout the repayment process. Active Army LRP participants earn their first loan repayment after completion of a full year of active duty and for each full year thereafter, up to 3 years. Payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500, whichever is greater, is authorized annually to the loan holder on the total remaining original outstanding principal balance.

The Government will not make any payments to the soldier or reimburse a soldier if he or she pays off a student loan. The Government will only pay the lending institution.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the Regular Army. Chapter 7, section IV discusses defective or unfulfilled enlistment or reenlistment agreements. It states that an enlisted soldier will be discharged when a defective enlistment or reenlistment agreement exists under three circumstances. One circumstance is when a material misrepresentation is made by recruiting or retention personnel on which the soldier reasonably relied and thereby was induced to enlist or reenlist with a commitment for which the soldier was not qualified. An unfulfilled enlistment commitment exists when the soldier received a written enlistment commitment from recruiting personnel for which the soldier was qualified but which cannot be fulfilled by the Army and the soldier did not knowingly take part in the creation of the unfulfilled enlistment commitment.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for the LRP incentive. He had obtained several student loans prior to his entry on active duty and they were not in default prior to his entry on active duty.

2. PERSCOM did not dispute the applicant's contention that the loans in question were "student loans." PERSCOM noted only that several of his loans did not fall under the requirements of Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to qualify for repayment under the LRP.
3. The applicant states that he showed his promissory notes to recruiting officials prior to his enlistment and they were "approved." The only evidence available which shows he provided promissory notes to recruiting officials is his DA Form 3286-59, which shows that "promissory notes" were provided. No detailed information as to which promissory notes were provided is given. He provides no evidence, such as a sworn statement or affidavit from his recruiter and/or guidance counselor or other official, providing the details behind his contention that all his loans were approved and thereby substantiating his contention. The Board concludes that it would not be equitable to grant the relief requested in the absence of such substantiating evidence.

4. The applicant also has the option of requesting discharge due to a defective or unfulfilled enlistment agreement.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mhm___ __dsj___ __jam___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2003084907
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20030520
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 112.12
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059257C070421

    Original file (2001059257C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060302C070421

    Original file (2001060302C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040010264C070208

    Original file (040010264C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The branch did indicate that he did have loans of $17,620.67 other than the private loans that did qualify for repayment under the LRP, and that the appropriate payments would be authorized toward his qualifying loans. In his rebuttal, dated 22 January 2005, the applicant stated that he was never provided a copy of the education act [cited in the advisory opinion], but was persuaded by his guidance counselor and his recruiter that all of his loans qualified and would be repaid in full by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060016557C071029

    Original file (AR20060016557C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086767C070212

    Original file (2003086767C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted for the Loan Repayment Program incentive. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show her DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and such failure results in nonpayment of the loan by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090469C070212

    Original file (2003090469C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Loans that qualify for repayment under the LRP are Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students, Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS), and consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087287C070212

    Original file (2003087287C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    if enlisting for the LRP [Loan Repayment Program], disenroll the applicant or soldier from the GI Bill; and c.) verify that the applicant has qualifying loans if enlisting for the LRP. Wide discretions are available to this Board under Title 10, US Code, Section 1552, which includes the authority to amend the applicant’s DA Form 3286-66 to include the sentence, “If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003990C070206

    Original file (20050003990C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army repay a student loan under the Loan Repayment Program (LRP). The applicant's military records should be corrected to show his Statement for Enlistment, United States Army Enlistment Program, was amended to include the sentence, "If a student loan is accepted by the officials processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081588C070215

    Original file (2002081588C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her application, she submits a letter of explanation, dated 5 November 2002; two pages of handwritten notes/instructions pertaining to promissory notes; a letter, dated 6 December 2001; a Sallie Mae Truth in Lending Disclosure, dated 19 October 1999; a Signature Education Loan Program from Sallie Mae loan application, dated 5 October 1999; a Sallie Mae Truth in Lending Disclosure, dated 21 August 1999; a Signature Education Loan Program from Sallie Mae loan application, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057836C070420

    Original file (2001057836C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, Army Guidance Counselors are required to verify that a member enlisting for the LRP has qualifying loans and to advise those members if any loan is not eligible for repayment. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually...